Canadian Climate Change

696 Words2 Pages

Unfortunately, the impact of climate change has now become a reality in the lives of Canadian residences. Global emissions need to start decreasing as rapidly as possible to avoid further disastrous impacts of global warming. Some say the method to boost innovation and reward the fast uptake of clean energy is to aggressively tax the carbon content of coal, oil, and natural gas, but that may not be the best solution. Even though agriculture is a source, it also is a sink for carbon. It serves as an offset for high emitting sectors. The use of pesticides and fertilizers, fuel and oil for tractors, equipment, trucking and shipping, emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and other greenhouse gasses are causes of global emissions. …show more content…

Because we're not going to be able to produce it anymore," Darcy Fitzgerald said — executive director of Alberta Pork. At the top of the list of worries for Canadian farmers is staying competitive. Canada sells into a global marketplace with no ability to pass their added costs of production. Canada's carbon price may weaken the farm sector in one of the world's biggest grain-shipping countries, raising farmers' costs and discouraging investment in production. Therefore, it will only make Canadian farms less competitive verses other farmers like the USA. "If all of a sudden Canadian farmers have a carbon tax that gets written into their production costs that the United States or Australia doesn't have, that puts them in a very uncompetitive position," said Ron Bonnett, president of the Canadian Federation of …show more content…

Singly reducing greenhouse gasses would not make a cavity on global emissions and only lower temperatures a few tenths of a degree Celsius over the next eighty-five years. With the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) struggling and "carbon credit frauds" in the news, numerous specialists claim we must get rid of carbon trading and opt for carbon taxes instead. But according to Alex Trembath and Matthew Step, carbon taxes will “Do nothing to cut emissions because they don't lead to innovation. "Steve Jobs didn't develop the PC because the price of typewriters went up." The only line of attack to get a substantial reduction in global emissions is by developing much cheaper and better clean energy technologies. Modern clean energy alternatives cost considerably more than conventional power. Expecting consumers and businesses to pay yet another tax, especially in poor developing nations, to pay a significant price premium for clean energy is

Open Document