Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Health care quality canada vs us
Compare and analyze the Canadian and the U.S. health care systems
Compare and analyze the Canadian and the U.S. health care systems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Health care quality canada vs us
Efficiency of Canada’s Health Care System
Summary
Many policy makers and citizens of Canada, question whether or not Canada’s heath care systems meet the needs of its citizens. For the reason that, patients tend to worry about how fast a severe injury or illness can be cured, without deteriorating the patients’ health. This is a justified concern, considering the fact that the longer a patient wait to be treated, the costlier it is for recovery, especially when surgery is needed. To measure efficiency of healthcare, it must be determined if wait time reduction and availability is being performed more efficiently in one province, in comparison to others, using wait times or the number of patients treated as the main focus.
Comparing efficiency scores across provinces, provides evidence that there are only small differences in efficiency’s. However, by using multiple regressions it is evident that the reason for the difference in efficiency is not because of better productivity in some provinces’ health care, but instead the characteristics of the population, specifically the percentage of senior and post-secondary educated citizens since they tend to seek more treatments. Hence, for the time being, each province in Canada should share their best procedures to decrease wait times. However, in the long-run new procedures would have to be
…show more content…
Whereas input is categorized as capital, labour, energy, materials and services. Using a biased-adjusted estimate of efficiency with wait time as output between 2001 and 2008, the average efficiency score in regards to quantity inputs is 1.07, with Quebec having the highest inefficiency, 1.27 and Saskatchewan the lowest at 1.04. However, when measuring the efficiency of wait time with respect to expenditure, Ontario, is the most efficient at 1.348, and Alberta the least efficient with a score of
In Samuelson and Antony’s book Power and Resistance, renowned sociologist Professor Pat Armstrong tackles the topic of health care reform from a critical feminist perspective. Her analytic critique of the historic tenets of Health Care policy in Canada, effectively points out a systemic disadvantage for the women of our society. Which, in the spirit of transparency, completely blind sighted me as a first time reader because, well, this is Canada. Canada, the internationally renowned first world nation with a reputation for progressive social reform. The same Canada that Americans make fun of for being ‘too soft’. As far as the world is concerned we’re the shining nation-state example of how to do health care right. Needless to say, Professor
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
When you take the socialistic perspective towards implementing this system in Canada, you can see the advantages it brings to improving health care. If the government plays a larger role in funding the development of electronic health records for private and smaller organizations the benefits will immediately result in better quality of health care. As shown in a study done by the University of California in San Francisco that focused on expensive costs that make it difficult for smaller practices to incorporate electronic health records, “need policies designed to provide incentives and support services to help practices improve the quality of their care by using EHRs.” (Miller, West, Brown, Sim & Ganchoff, 2005) In this article they explain that electronic health records improve quality of health care, but the costs are too expensive for small practices to incorporate them.
... wait times and the problem of our physician shortages. Becoming aware of the reasons why our physicians leave Canada, will be the stepping stone to create/match the attractive deals that steal them from us. The shortage of our physicians and the long wait times in the emergency room is closely connected. The government needs to look at all propositions that have been mentioned in order to fix these issues. There are all kinds of advanced health care providers that can help with this problem by aiding in the emergency rooms and remove the burden of overworked physicians. If we organize our health care providers in a new way, the wait times in our emergency rooms could be greatly reduced. The public should take control of their health by not tolerating the present state of affairs. Their health is being harmed by extended wait times and lack of health care workers.
At the beginning of the 20th century healthcare was a necessity in Canada, but it was not easy to afford. When Medicare was introduced, Canadians were thrilled to know that their tax dollars were going to benefit them in the future. The introduction of Medicare made it easier for Canadians to afford healthcare. Medicare helped define Canada as an equal country, with equal rights, services and respect for every Canadian citizen. Medicare helped less wealthy Canadians afford proper healthcare. Canadian citizens who had suffered from illness because they could not afford healthcare, were able to get proper treatment. The hospitals of Canada were no longer compared by their patients’ wealth, but by their amount of service and commitment. Many doctors tried to stop the Medicare act, but the government and citizens outvoted them and the act was passed. The doctors were then forced to treat patients in order of illness and not by the amount of money they had. Medicare’s powerful impact on Canadian society was recognized globally and put into effect in other nations all around the world. Equality then became a definition which every Canadian citizen understood.
LaPierre, T. A. (2012). Comparing the Canadian and US Systems of Health Care in an Era of Health Care Reform. Journal of Health Care Finance, 38(4), 1-18.
Being a Canadian citizen, it is hard for me to think of life without any health insurance. I have had public health insurance all my life growing up and have been free to go to any hospital at any time and get some form of health care. Residing in the United States off and for the last 7 years I have experienced health care from both sides. I feel that private health care has huge advantages over public health care. In the following essay I will explain in three points why I feel strongly about private health care as opposed to public. What is better is always subjective, and I will not try to argue the point of health for all, but instead for the individual who is seeking the best health care possible, and is willing to put the resources into obtaining that. I will be addressing efficiency and quality, not inclusion of everyone (free health care), I will be addressing the root of this and not just that one argument, which would detract from my focus. I will not be getting into the political debate of socialism vs. capitalism, as that is a separate argument in itself, and this country is currently running under capitalism. Again coming from living in both a socialist and then a capitalist society, I feel I can do so in an unbiased manner.
In Canada, access to health care is ‘universal’ to its citizens under the Canadian Health Care Act and this system is considered to the one of the best in the world (Laurel & Richard, 2002). Access to health care is assumed on the strong social value of equality and is defined as the distribution of services to all those in need and for the common good and health of all residents (Fierlbeck, 2011). Equitable access to health care does not mean that all citizens are subjected to receive the same number of services but rather that wherever the service is provided it is based on need. Therefore, not all Canadians have equal access to health services. The Aboriginal peoples in Canada in particular are a population that is overlooked and underserved
Brian Lindenberg, “Canadian Healthcare: What Works and What Doesn’t | Benefits Canada,” accessed February 14, 2014, http://www.benefitscanada.com/benefits/health-wellness/canadian-healthcare-what-works-and-what-doesn%E2%80%99t-27647.
I believe that Canada has contributed a lot to the understanding of health and disease over the years. A few examples I have been able to come up with would be the discovery of Insulin by Frederick Banting and Charles Best in 1921, and Dr. Penfield’s discovery on treating epilepsy using a method called the Montreal Procedure in 1934. George Klein invented the electric wheelchair in 1952, and in. Doctors James E. Till and Ernest A. McCulloch discovered the “hemopoietic stem cell” in 1961, which played a crucial part in the transplantation of bone marrow and treating certain diseases later on. These discoveries have helped to make the world a healthier place. Of course, along with diseases and cures come many more diseases. Third world countries suffer less from diseases such as cancer and diabetes because they do not have an advanced health care like first world countries do.
Today, Canadians are concerned with many issues involving health care. It is the responsibility of the provincial party to come up with a fair, yet reasonable solution to this issue. This solution must support Canadians for the best; it involves people and how they are treated when in need for health care. The Liberal party feels that they have the best solution that will provide Canadians with the best results. It states that people will have the protection of medicare and will help with concerns like: injury prevention, nutrition, physical activity, mental health, etc. The Canadian Alliance Party’s plan is to make several policy-developments to benefit Canada’s health care. They believe it will serve the security and well-being best for all Canadians. The last party involved in this issue is the NDP Party; who indicate that they are fighting hard for a better Health Care system in our economy. The NDP Party states that the income of a family should not dictate the quality of health care.
“Homelessness can be the cause as well as the result of poor health” (Wise, Emily, Debrody, Corey &ump; Paniucki, Heather, 1999, p.445). This is a reoccurring theme that has existed within the homeless population for decades. While programs to help reduce this constant circle are being put in place all over the country to provide medical services for the homeless to be able to go to, many are still finding that health care needs for individuals as well as homeless communities are not being met. Many studies have been completed that study both the opinion on healthcare by those who have access to sufficient health care and homeless people’s perceptions on health care administration. While many companies are working to provide more personal health care systems, it appears that the larger problem is with a lack of people know about the health care systems that are in place to help them. Companies are trying to advertise more often to inform homeless people that there is health care out there for them.
The Canadian healthcare system is a socialized system that offers universal coverage to all Canadians at a cost, it is not for free. It is publicly funded and administered on a provincial basis. This means that each province collects money for healthcare from taxes. On average, each Canadian pays about $6,000-$9,000 per year- which is not that much different from the American private healthcare. The federal government collects the taxes then distributes money to each province based on the needs. The major requirement of the Canada Health Act is that all provinces, which do get federal money to deliver healthcare, have transparency and accountability, be universal and portable. This means that a Canadian living in one province can move to another province and still have the same medical coverage. The type of medical services provided is left to each province. While most of the basic health care is covered, plastic surgery for cosmetic reasons and certain other rehabilitation services are not covered. It is important to know that in this system there are often very long delays to get surgery or to see
I want to start with this, when was the last time you thought of how deeply privileged you are? For people like us, Australians, compared to other countries we are a lucky country as we have a high life expectancy. We have access to clean water. We have an abundance of nutritious food, and life saving medicines. Despite this rosy picture, it is evident that we can improve on the delivering of healthcare in a range of areas making our healthcare more effective, accessible and affordable.
First, we must know some facts about Canada before talking about the nature of its political system. Canada is the second largest country in the world right after Russia, It has a total area of 9.9 million square kilometers (3.8 million square miles) .It is located in the northernmost part of North America. The U.S. / Canada Border is the longest international border in the world, which is 8,893 kilometers in length. Canada borders the United States along its southern border, as well as its western border, where it borders the US state of Alaska, and it lacks military defense.