Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Universal health coverage is easy
Universal health coverage is easy
Universal healthcare brief introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Universal health coverage is easy
Conclusion Canada’s health care system provides universal health insurance program financed through the federal government meaning all citizens of Canada have access to health coverage. However, the policies and the implantation of these policies have neglected factors which are necessary and important for promoting good health. Some of these factors include inequalities in income, living conditions, health services, and food security. An effective way of improving health is to improve living conditions which also improves the social detriments of health (Social Determinants of Health, 2010). Another important policy that needs to be implemented is affordable child care as it would improve early childhood development overall. This can …show more content…
Individuals with higher income or the elite live in conditions where they have basic necessities and also can fulfill their needs. In contrast those who live on a minimal income or in poverty do not have the luxury of fulfilling their basic necessities in which they have to make sacrifices. These sacrifices may include working long hours and buying processed foods with no nutrients because it is cheaper. Because of these sacrifices one is more prone to ill health because of the risk they are taking. The dilemma here is that we live in country were there is access to these services however there are people who still live in poverty and are homeless mainly because of public policies. If the government was to increase the minimum wage it would slowly reduce and eventually diminish income inequalities. To increase job security and employment policies that includes equal opportunity of pay and hiring, and standards that allow anyone to have adequate source of income needs to be implanted by the government (Social Determinants of Health, …show more content…
By increasing the prices, it was shown that many individuals were financially burdened though the drug needed was an essential and even prescribed by a doctor or physician. Drug insurance coverage is different in provinces and territories and the insight here would be for the Government to be looking forward to creating a universal Drug coverage insurance plan rather than agreeing to the demands of these companies as expressed by others (The Future of Drug Coverage in Canada, 2015, pg. 17). Private corporations market for costly ineffective new treatments that cause a strain on one who lives on a fixed budget; health authorities must regulate these inequalities with the help of the government. By creating and efficiently implanting solutions to these problems through these insights it will not only help individuals but it will better Canada’s Health Care system economically and financially. This is because, there will be a decrease in labor costs and eventually decrease the health expenditures in Canada (Gagnon,
In Samuelson and Antony’s book Power and Resistance, renowned sociologist Professor Pat Armstrong tackles the topic of health care reform from a critical feminist perspective. Her analytic critique of the historic tenets of Health Care policy in Canada, effectively points out a systemic disadvantage for the women of our society. Which, in the spirit of transparency, completely blind sighted me as a first time reader because, well, this is Canada. Canada, the internationally renowned first world nation with a reputation for progressive social reform. The same Canada that Americans make fun of for being ‘too soft’. As far as the world is concerned we’re the shining nation-state example of how to do health care right. Needless to say, Professor
Neighboring countries, United States and Canada have close ties to one another, share the same language and have many of the same fundamental and religious beliefs. It is an interesting debt as to which provides a superior healthcare system. In order to better understand the strengths and weakness of the two systems, this paper will review four important structural and functional elements of each system.
It is an assumption by many that Canada has one of the best healthcare systems in the world. But do they really? There are numerous health services in Canada which should be part of the universal care nonetheless are not. These include but are not limited to: dental care, vision care, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and prescription drug coverage. This report will solely focus on why basic dental care should be a part of the Canadian universal healthcare. Dental care is predominantly delivered in the private sector on a fee-for-service basis, with approximately 62.6% of Canadians paying for care through employment-based insurance and 31.9% through out-of-pocket expenditures and only a small amount of the Canadians, 5.5%, are qualified for public funding through government assistance programmes (Ramraj and Quinonez, 2012). It was seen that by 2009, dental coverage affordability became a problem not just for the low income families but also impacted middle-income earners as a result of their lack of, or decreased access to comprehensive dental insurance (Ramraj, 2013). It is stated by the World Health Organization that universal health care coverage should reassure access to necessary care and protect patients from financial hardship, and that the governments are obligated to
A Canadian Dermatologist who once worked in the United States breaks down the pros and cons of Canada’s health care system and explains why he thinks the Canadian system is superior to America’s. Canada runs a single payer health care system, which means that health care is controlled by the government rather than private insurance companies. One of the main pros of the Canadian health care system is that everyone is insured. He says that in the province of Ontario, the Ministry of Health insures all of its citizens, all important health needs such as physician visits, home nursing and physical therapy are covered. Since every resident is covered under the government plan the problem of patients being turned away due to lacking medical coverage
LaPierre, T. A. (2012). Comparing the Canadian and US Systems of Health Care in an Era of Health Care Reform. Journal of Health Care Finance, 38(4), 1-18.
Being a Canadian citizen, it is hard for me to think of life without any health insurance. I have had public health insurance all my life growing up and have been free to go to any hospital at any time and get some form of health care. Residing in the United States off and for the last 7 years I have experienced health care from both sides. I feel that private health care has huge advantages over public health care. In the following essay I will explain in three points why I feel strongly about private health care as opposed to public. What is better is always subjective, and I will not try to argue the point of health for all, but instead for the individual who is seeking the best health care possible, and is willing to put the resources into obtaining that. I will be addressing efficiency and quality, not inclusion of everyone (free health care), I will be addressing the root of this and not just that one argument, which would detract from my focus. I will not be getting into the political debate of socialism vs. capitalism, as that is a separate argument in itself, and this country is currently running under capitalism. Again coming from living in both a socialist and then a capitalist society, I feel I can do so in an unbiased manner.
In Canada, access to health care is ‘universal’ to its citizens under the Canadian Health Care Act and this system is considered to the one of the best in the world (Laurel & Richard, 2002). Access to health care is assumed on the strong social value of equality and is defined as the distribution of services to all those in need and for the common good and health of all residents (Fierlbeck, 2011). Equitable access to health care does not mean that all citizens are subjected to receive the same number of services but rather that wherever the service is provided it is based on need. Therefore, not all Canadians have equal access to health services. The Aboriginal peoples in Canada in particular are a population that is overlooked and underserved
Armstrong, P., & Armstrong, H. (1996). Wasting Away: The Undermining of Canadian Health Care. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Today, Canadians are concerned with many issues involving health care. It is the responsibility of the provincial party to come up with a fair, yet reasonable solution to this issue. This solution must support Canadians for the best; it involves people and how they are treated when in need for health care. The Liberal party feels that they have the best solution that will provide Canadians with the best results. It states that people will have the protection of medicare and will help with concerns like: injury prevention, nutrition, physical activity, mental health, etc. The Canadian Alliance Party’s plan is to make several policy-developments to benefit Canada’s health care. They believe it will serve the security and well-being best for all Canadians. The last party involved in this issue is the NDP Party; who indicate that they are fighting hard for a better Health Care system in our economy. The NDP Party states that the income of a family should not dictate the quality of health care.
Pierre, N., Pollack, N., & Fafard, P. (2007). Health Policies and Trends for Selected Target Groups in Canada.
In recent years’ health reform has been a driving force in the United States political system. If you watch the news, you will understand how citizens, the government, or the economy are or might be affected by some sort of change in medical regulation. One of these hot topic issues is the cost of prescription drugs. Every major drug market besides the United States regulates the price of drugs in some way (Abbott and Vernon). By the United States not doing so, many believe it opens consumers up to being exploited by large pharmaceutical companies.
The subject and discussion of health care in Canada is a national hot-button topic. With the 2015 federal election approaching, Canadians will have an opportunity voice their concerns and shape the future of the health care system. In The Globe and Mail’s article, “When a stagnant health system meets an aging population, disaster awaits”, the current state of Canada’s treasured Medicare system is brought to center stage. The Globe and Mail article “When a stagnant” (2015), reveals the daily struggles of health care professionals trying to find beds for patients, timeliness of patient care, Canada’s health care system in the global scope, and suggests to improve the current system by allowing the private sector to fund, build, and staff long-term care facilities for our aging population. Canada’s health care system is in need of a major overhaul to support the wave of aging seniors and increasing population.
Health care is continuously evolving worldwide, however, healthcare amongst countries can be tremendously different. They are different in terms of the coverage their nation receives. The types of universal health care are single payer, two-tier, and insurance mandate. Canada itself is lucky enough to be a country that is single payer, for now. This means that the government will provide healthcare insurance for individuals and fund most of their healthcare needs.
Health care policies and actions are executed to achieve health care goals within a society. Individuals are granted with medical services under Canada’s Federal healthcare system (Government of Canada, 2016). The performance of the healthcare industry is beginning to increase. From a North American outlook, the health care sector grew by 5.4% in 2014 to reach a value of 3.3 billion (MarketLine, 2015). According to Statistics Canada, most jobs created in Canada since the 1980’s have been in the service sector.