Calpurnia In To Kill A Mockingbird

682 Words2 Pages

people and that they must be doing something to that effect in order to be respected. Atticus is honored and admired for his common policy of fair treatment- and yet, Calpurnia is vilified for having to walk two different roads and change her mannerisms. This is in part because she is black, but also because she is a woman- Cal must be careful to watch her step, watch her tone, and has to be more aware of her actions than Atticus would ever need to be. And instead of gaining respect for this balancing act, Scout thinks that Cal should “know better” than to adjust her mannerisms based on the audience. In addition, when Mr. Raymond is revealed to not be a drunkard but instead just gives people something to latch onto- another example of someone …show more content…

At the age of 24, Heller joined the fray and was a fighter pilot in World War 2. Heller explains that while his own experiences certainly contributed to the novel, it’s not meant to be a reflection of World War 2- at least, not directly. "Catch-22 wasn't," as he later explained, "really about World War Two. It was about American society during the Cold War, during the Korean War, and about the possibility of a Vietnam" (Merrill 160). However, certain concepts from World War 2, like the supposed evils of the Italian and German people, were shown profusely. Heller included a scene where the citizens of an Italian village were needlessly bombed without warning, critiquing the concept of a moral superior- when war has been waged, no one can claim higher ground (Antiwar Sentiment). Through these, Heller supports the idea that international violence does nothing but reduce men to their lowest …show more content…

The central Catch-22 of the novel concerns anyone trying to save their skin and avoid combat- to get discharged, a person has to be insane. In order to be qualified as insane, the person has to request to be grounded. Anyone who wants to stop flying must be sane, so, therefore, they must sane enough to continue flying. The circular and nonsensical nature of this conundrum represents the hurdles soldiers would need to go through to survive, and also shows the disconnect between those in charge and those doing work. Jonathan Weinberg examined this idea while analyzing David Graeber’s book The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy. Within this piece, Weinberg claims that the sheer act of bureaucracy is in itself violent- the rules, regulations, and restrictions imposed on people in civilian and military lifestyles is oppressive and demeaning. While Yossarian struggles against the abstract system of power he must work under, there are more concrete examples of the disastrous systems in place. The man who is wrapped in bandages in the hospital, kept alive by pure force of will, is unable to eat, move, or explore autonomy. The man in white represents the dehumanization that warfare reduces individuals to. He was kept alive only to prove that it’s possible- this war is only being

Open Document