More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of the ban on smoking in public places
Effects of the ban on smoking in public places
The effects of banning cigarettes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of the ban on smoking in public places
The CVS has decided it wants to halt cigarette sales. Cigarette smoking is very injurious to health. However, the government hasn’t stopped producing tobacco because of its economical benefits. This is an interesting topic for analyzing the changes it would bring to the economy of a country and whether it’s a good decision or not. Smoking is a personal choice for everyone; however in the long run it has an effect on the economy.
There are many reasons why I think this decision will be more destructive than beneficial.
Tobacco industries increase direct and indirect employment. The various job opportunities that can be given involve producing and distributing tobacco products and supplying goods and services to various industries. If this business decision goes through, then many employees will lose their jobs cause more unemployment, which impacts the economy as a whole and could change the value of money. If they stop production, it will increase black market activities, affecting many companies, in and out the tobacco industry.
The collected tax from cigarette sales is mostly ...
This year alone cigarettes will kill over 420,000 Americans, and many more will suffer from cancers, and circulatory and respiratory system diseases. These horrible illnesses were known to come from cigarettes for years. Recently the Food and Drug Administration declared nicotine, the main chemical in cigarettes, addictive. This explains why smokers continue to use cigarettes even though smokers are aware of the constantly warned about health dangers in cigarettes. Some researchers have also found out that smoking by pregnant women causes the deaths of over 5,000 babies and 115,000 miscarriages. The only way to get rid of the suffering and loss of life by cigarettes is to ban them. . For years cigarettes have been known to cause cancer, emphysema, and other horrible illnesses. The deaths of over 420,000 of Americans this year will be do to cigarettes. With all the other causes of deaths, alcohol, illegal drugs, AIDS, suicide, transportation accidents, fires, and guns, cigarettes still count for more deaths than those do combined. We can’t stand and watch people die because they smoke cigarettes. Thousands of smokers try to rid themselves of cigarettes but can't because of additive nicotine. Nicotine was recently declared addictive by the Food and Drug Administration, which explains why many smokers continue to smoke despite the health warnings on cigarette smoking. Nicotine makes it almost impossible for cigarette smokers to quit smoking because of its addictive nature, and with the cigarette manufacturers putting just enough nicotine in the so they cant be outlawed. The benefits of outlawing cigarettes greatly outnumber the disadvantages, for example, many scientists believe a link between smoking and a shortened life span exists between the two, a ban on cigarettes could increase life spans. Many studies suggest that billions of dollars now spent on smoking related. Smoking related illnesses could be reduced by outlawing cigarettes, families could save money by not purchasing cigarettes, and accidental fires costing millions of dollars caused by cigarettes would stop. Although a complete ban on cigarettes currently remains almost impossible, several organizations recently helped create a bill that could control cigarettes much in the same way the government now controls drugs. One such organization, the Food and Drug Administration, headed by David Kesslar drafted a major part, which would require manufacturers to disclose the 700 chemical additives in cigarettes, reduce the level of harmful chemicals, require cigarette companies to warn of the addictive nicotine, restrict tobacco advertising and promotion, and control the level of nicotine cigarettes contain.
The author identifies two reasons to be the probable cause for pharmacies or grocery stores to stop selling tobacco products. The reasons that he highlights are the health related argument and the restriction imposed on selling it. CVS is a pharmacy that is selling medications and products that helps people health. Since tobacco is not making people health any good, the question of it being ethically right to sell it in pharmacies has brought people’s attention. The author packs his thoughts with an example of the New York retailers that have stopped selling tobacco product because of the high tax rates from 1.25$ to 4.35$ per pack in 2010. Also, the restrictions implemented like having a license to sell it and fees increase from 100$ to 1000$
As businesses transition into a smoke free work place, the total environment is condemned smoke free. Twenty years ago, restaurants allowed customers to smoke, where as now that smoke free policy has risen there are almost no restaurants or bars that allow smoking in the building. The majority of a restaurant’s customers are non smokers; therefore the income of customers would increase because non smokers would not have to worry about second hand smoke. Based on Zagat’s Release of 2008 America’s top restaurants survey, “ The 2008 Zagat Survey “ America’s Top Restaurants of 132,000 Americans noted that “The verdict on smoking is overwhelming with seventy seven percent of diners saying they’d eat out less if smoking were permitted in local restaurants, and only two percent saying they’d dine out more.” (Par. 5). Due to the ban of smoking in restaurants, more non smokers are able to come in, therefore businesses are able to make more a profit and not be hurt by the smoking restrictions. According to the article, Smoke-free Legislation: A review of Health and Economic Outcome of Research, by EJ Hahn, “ A 2010 analysis of economic outcomes of smoke free laws stated,” there is clear evidence that smoke-free legislation does not hurt restaurants or bar businesses, and in some cases businesses may improve.” (Par. 5). The economy has started to cater towards the larger population of non-smokers in order to increase their revenue, but having smoke-free business they are enabling more of the population to feel comfortable coming into their business and taking a seat.
First, the article claims that the policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes would discourage people from indulging in unhealthy behaviors. The professor, by contrast, contends that high taxes on cigarettes do not lead to healthier society. She explains that the people will try to buy cheaper cigarettes which will have effect on their health more than the expensive one.
To this day, the tobacco industry is a multi billion-dollar industry that brings in income based off the addiction and poor health of society. This industry, brining in so much money for itself, costs billons of dollars on society. In a paper by the “Coalition Québécoise pour le Contrôle du Tabac”, the economic costs of cigarettes on Canadian society were analyzed. It was found that in 1999, the total cost of tobacco and cigarette use on Canadian health care can be estimated to be $2,644,480,000; this health care cost includes, but is not limited to, cigarette related hospitalizations, medical care and medication (“Tobacco: Economic Considerations” 1). The Coalition found that tying in with this cost, and costs due to “indirect productivity
sets an example to how it will hurt the nation as one, not only will
It touched the topic of economic values of tobacco industry for country that includes tobacco producers (farmers) and manufactures, with worth value of $1000 (2009). It also provided the estimated number of labor work in tobacco farming in India which is 3.5 million. Additionally, authors gave information on impact of taxes on tobacco use and discussed the areas those still needs to be concern.
For instance, CVS, one of the nation 's greatest pharmacies, said that a year after it chose to quit offering cigarettes, cigarette sales over all retailers have dropped in 13 states where it has sizable market share. In fact, in data released on Thursday, the company said that its decision to stop selling tobacco products has led to a drop in U.S. tobacco sales reducing purchases by 95 million packs in all retailers. Nevertheless, the best solution is the companies should stop to product the cigaret, if they do most of smokers will certainly stop smoking because they can not find it. Thus will decrease the number of deaths and
The sale of cigarettes and tobacco is a multi-billion dollar industry, but is it truly worth all the problems that stem from their use. Health care costs are extremely high due to all the health problems associated with cigarettes and tobacco. Even though research has proven time and time again the harmful effects of cigarettes, and the rising cost of health care caused by cigarettes our government will not take a stand and stop all manufacturing of the horrible toxins.
Should tobacco companies keep producing products or stop producing products. I think tobacco companies should stop producing products because it kills family members or friends and is really addictive. Teenagers think it is cool to chew or smoke so they get addicted and could die.
In today’s generation, there are about 1.1 billion people around the world who are smokers. In about 30 years or more, half will be killed due to the use of tobacco in cigarettes. Surrounding people may also get sick and eventually also die by doing nothing wrong but just breathing in the toxic air from smoking. Therefore this problem has led world to a debate about “Why the sale of cigarettes should be banned?”
For this paper, I will to focus on smoking in the United States population as smoking causes a significant burden on health care systems and on the economy. Smoking negatively affects most organs, causing cancer, heart disease, stroke, lung disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and other diseases. Tobacco use costs more than $300 billion per year in medical care and lost productivity due to premature death and secondhand smoke in the United States. Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States (US), causing more than 480,000 deaths per year in the US and contributing to smokers dying ten years earlier than nonsmokers. Additionally, nicotine, an ingredient naturally in
The cigarette is the deadliest artifact in the history of human civilization. I propose that we abolish the use of tobacco and treat it as an illegal drug. Companies invest in billions of advertisements to make this drug appealing for everyday use, they are marketing new and trendy ways to make smoking tobacco appeal to a younger crowd. There have been different methods to reduce the use tobacco like increased taxation, bans on advertising, and expansion of smoke-free spaces. Prohibiting the sale of cigarettes would result in the savings of healthcare costs and increased labour productivity. Tobacco is a lethal drug that has contributed to the death of millions, I believe the use of tobacco should be considered an illegal drug.
Tobacco products have long been a source of controversy. Although scientific data has proven that cigarettes contain harmful ingredients, they continue to be sold or smuggled into every country in the world. Famously, in 1960, the US Surgeon Dr. Luther Terry the devastating effects of tobacco use (General, 1972). Tobacco firms have since faced an uphill battle throughout developed countries. This has placed World governments, but also big tobacco companies, in a uniquely awkward situation. On the one hand, tobacco companies have been allowed to legally produce an addictive and toxic product for human consumption. Profits from their business have been massive. Mehra (n.d) conducted revenue analysis for 2014 and determined RJ Reynolds had received 6.8 billion dollars. On the other hand, World governments have made huge pushes towards strangling tobacco companies. This, presented as a public service, can be seen in the form of levied taxes and bans advertising. It is these bands on Tobacco advertising that I wish to address. Specifically, a February 2001 announcement by the government of India, to ban advertising by tobacco companies (ICMR, n.d.).
In conclusion, smoking is considered as a very bad habit and alarming problem that threatens people’s life. Smoking has bad effects not only on smokers but it is very harmful to non-smokers or second-hand smokers as well. Latest researches have proved that smokers compared to non-smokers, are more likely to suffer from heart diseases and lung cancers. Therefore, governments should issue regulations and laws that limit the consumption of cigarettes in public places such as imposing fines. On the other hand, advocates of smoking justifies their opinion of the importance of cigarettes in increasing relaxation and concentration for people, especially those who work for hours under pressure. Furthermore, smoking plays a significant role in economy as it helps to provide work opportunities, investments as well as achieving profits and earnings from taxes.