Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of logistics management
Important of logistics management
Industrial sectors commonly used
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of logistics management
1. INDUSTRY C.H. Robinson Worldwide is a third party logistics “provider of multimodal transportation services and logistics solutions.” (Chrobinson.com) C.H. Robinson Worldwide belongs to the industrial sector, airfreight and logistics sub-industry. Jim Corridore in the Standards and Poors Sub-Industry review states that there is “a positive fundamental outlook for the air freight and logistics industry for the next 12 months.” (Standardabpoors.com) Katie Lally suggests that 2014 “should still be a profitable year for transportation” despite the economy did not recover fully after the Recession. (kcsmartport.com) I would say that the forecasts for 2014 for the transportation and logistics sub-industry in the U.S. and globally differ. The American Recession affected the world’s economy. The transportation service as a product itself depends on the sales and merchandize production growth. Globally and domestically, economy recovers at a different speed. Transportation and logistics companies that have their presence worldwide have more chances to increase their revenues. As Corridore mentions in his Sub-Industry review, “the volume of activity coming out of Asia, and particularly China, should act as a natural support to air freight volumes over the next couple of years.” (Standardabpoors.com) The transportation and logistics companies will always be present on the market: any give product should be transported from the production line to the retail point. The biggest concern is the retail and manufacturing growth because the transportation and logistics sector heavily depends on it. In her article, Lally mentions that “Washington-based global agency projected growth of the world economy in 2014 to clock in at only 2.4 percent, dow... ... middle of paper ... ...96 – 0.0576) E(Rs) = 5.149 or 5.15% As a result, “k” equals to 5.15%. Value of the company can be calculated using the PVGO: however, there is a problem with the formula because I found that in my case, g>k. To find the g rate, I was using the formula PEG ratio = (P/E)/g. Using the data from Yahoo Finance, I found P/E=15.93 and PEG ratio = 2.00. Therefore, g = (P/Ettm)/PEG ratio = 15.93 / 2 = 7.965% One of the explanations for g>k is that the formula we are using for the calculations is too simplistic and does not includes more factors. According to my calculations, the sustainable P/E ratio for the firm is negative 1.51. P/E = (1-b)/(k-ROE*b) = - 1.5083. If it were a smaller but positive number, I could tell that company does not have any possibility to growth. A negative P/E means that for some reason, a company is losing money. (Investopedia.com) Appendix 1
As unemployment has remained relatively steady from 2003 to 2007, the Gross Domestic Product for the United States has increased. The Air Transportation Industry contributes an average of 0.4 percent to the GDP. However, has GDP has increased, the Air
In order to do this the WACC approach will be used based on the assumption that leverage will stay constant after 2012. Industry average of debt/value is 28.1 percent and debt/equity 71.9 percent. These figures will be used as an estimate for long-term leverage because it is expected that AirThread will maintain a leverage ratio that is constant with the industry. From this the relevered equity beta is found to be 0.9847 which will give an equity rate of return of 9.42 percent. The rate of return on debt will be 5.5 percent. This is the percentage of debt because it is the interest rate of the 10 year U.S. Treasury bond. The WACC is now found to be 7.80 percent. Next, the long-term growth rate of 2.9 percent will be assumed to stay constant. In order to determine the FCF 2013 FCF 2012 of $315.60 will be multiplied by the growth rate. This will give a FCF 2013 of $323.48. The FCF 2013 will then be divided by the WACC minus growth rate. By doing this the PV of terminal value is found to be approximately $4.6 billion. To see the calculations for this step refer to Exhibit 3 in the
Based on the Terminal P/E and the cost of equity I made a sensitivity analysis chart through which I came up with a price of $33.37. This chart shows the different price ranges of the stock which could be possible if the Terminal P/E went higher or lower compared to the Cost of Equity.
In order to review the historical health of the firm I will calculate different ratios and gross margins and would try to see the trend. I will use Gordon Growth Model to find out the sustainable growth rate for the firm using historical data and then would compare it with its actual growth rate.
Financial Strength (mrq) -. Quick Ratio 0.49 Current Ratio 1.46 LT Debt/Equity 110.07 Total Debt/Equity 118.25 Mgt. Effectiveness (ttm) - a. Return on Investment % 13.23%. Return on Assets % 9.09%. Return on Equity % 25.77%.
The second method we used to analyze the firm’s value was the Comparable Companies Method. We used the historical figures as of 1990 and Goldmans Sach’s Projections. With an average of 22.
The main contributing factor to the decline in the return on stockholders’ equity (25.37% to 8.73%) was the decline in the profit margin (11.79% vs. 5.08%). The decrease in asset turnover (1.11 to 1.00) made a small contribution to the decline, as did the decline in the debt ratio (48.4% to 41.8%).
...rs, setting a good trend for the corporation. They also have a very low debt-to-equity ratio, indicating that they have enough equity to easily pay off any funds acquired from creditors. As a creditor I would feel safe in lending them funds for any future projects or endeavors.
The ratio of 1.7 for the last two years indicates consistency, although a lower number is preferred. As a company produces high value product, this could be a satisfactory ratio. By comparing it to 2011 when a ratio was 2.9, in the last two years a ratio improved
Firstly, based on the profitability, P&G has earned higher profit from each dollar of revenue which is 13.4% compared to C-P 12.9% for the recent year 2013. In addition, P&G also has higher EPS of US$4.04 compare to C-P US$2.41. In contrast, C-P register a Gross Profit of 58.7% and Return on Equity of 91.0% as opposed to P&G’s 49.6% and 17.0% respectively. C-P seems to rely heavily on debt and this has helped to improve the Return of Equity. P&G also has its downside in asset turnover ratio (0.62) and fixed turnover
The current price of Inuit was $45.900 with a P/E of 29.61. The stock’s fair value using its P/E Ratio was dismal at $24.58. From a fundamentalist view the stock should be sol...
In logistic industry, they have been through lots of challenge in worldwide market. As the containerization of the global economy scopes, a phase of development and explanation, ports find themselves inserted in ever changing commercial environment where logistics is the forefront. Thus, this industry reaches a phase of maturity and rationalization due to the process of logistic on land.
...t an amazing 10% per quarter. An example trend that is quickly developing in the freight cargo industry is the leasing of freight aircrafts to different airlines. The aircraft, crew, insurance and maintenance is included in the leasing.
– is a strategy in which one or a few plants are designated as the