Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nonviolent protests
Non - violent protest in America
Nonviolent protests
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Bystanders Are Not Guilty Change fears many people, which makes people bystanders, but change makes the world better. Change and standing up will make people’s situation in the world fadeaway. In the texts “Killers of a Dream” and “The Lottery”, people want to make change, but don’t do anything to make that change. Whether not changing or standing up for the racial prejudice in “killers of a Dream” or not standing up to stop a tradition that fears many in “The Lottery”, both texts represents people not doing anything to make change when they want change. Therefor, bystanders are not innocent in cases of civil justice because they are afraid to make a change and go against their tradition and how they live. People want to make a change around them, but they are afraid because they are afraid being harmed, …show more content…
“ It is a strange thing, this umbilical cord uncut. In time of ease, we do not feel its pull, but when we are threatened with change, suddenly it draws the whole white South together in a collective fear and fury that wipe our minds clear of reason and we were block from sensible contact with the world we live in,” ( Lillian Smith). This shows that people feared change because it would bring fear to them. People should know better, but people in this text kept doing it because it was like a tradition to them. People are taught in many ways, but the way the learned was wrong because they were taught the way other people were taught a tradition they should never learn live. In the text “The Lottery”, people lived a tradition that feared most. One person each year is chosen to die by throwing stones at that person. People wanted to make change and give up their tradition, but feared to do it because it will cause a ton of chaos. Plus, they were so used to the tradition that they didn”t want to change anything that want to be change. “Next thing you know, they'll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work any
In “The Lottery” the author uses many different types of themes to inspire the reader to feel certain emotions. Themes such as the perils of blindly sticking to outdated traditions. Traditions such as sacrificial murder in which some ancient societies believed that “Life brings death, and death recycles life” (Griffin); this shows how some readers could accept the actions depicted in this story. Yet another way of looking at it and finding a way to accept it is that it’s been said that capital punishment today is a form of ritualistic killing. But other readers may just see it as cold blooded murder in which they may be appalled that some societies could still do this in 1948 when this story was written.
In The Lottery, year after year, even since Old Man Warner, the oldest man in town, was a child, the same ritual has gone on. It is as if the community never learns from its previous mistakes. As long as no one in the town speaks up about such a twisted yearly event, nothing is ever going to change. If Martin Luther King or Malcolm X wouldn’t have raised their voices against the prejudice that they had experienced their entire lives, we might still be living in a segregated world, which was once thought to be “okay.” This is similar to The Lottery, in which the townspeople are brainwashed into believing that this ritual is normal. For example, Old Man Warner is outraged when he hears that the north village might give up the lottery, calling...
“The Lottery” is a short story about an event that takes place every year in a small village of New England. When the author speaks of “the lottery” he is referencing the lottery of death; this is when the stoning of a village member must give up his or her life. The villagers gather at a designated area and perform a customary ritual which has been practiced for many years. The Lottery is a short story about a tradition that the villagers are fully loyal to and represents a behavior or idea that has been passed down from generation to generation, accepting and following a rule no matter how cruel or illogical it is. Friends and family become insignificant the moment it is time to stone the unlucky victim.
Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” We are All Bystanders by Jason Marsh and Dacher Keltner is an article that reflects on the psychological and social phenomenon that refers to cases in which people do not offer any assistance or help to a victim. Studies say that a person's personality can determine how they react to a bystander situation. In a book called, The Heart of Altruism, author Kristen Monroe writes the altruistic perspective. Altruistic people are strongly connected to other humans and have a concern for the well-being of others. Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief exemplifies the bystander theory through Liesel and
Shirley Jackson’s “Lottery” satirically creates a society that puts the importance of tradition above even the life of the members of the community, as indicated by Old Man Warner’s response to Mr. Adams stating, “‘[O]ver in the north village they’re talking of giving up the lottery.’ Old Man Warner snorted. ‘Pack of crazy fools … Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them … There’s always been a lottery,’ he added petulantly” (413). Here Old Man Warner defends the tradition of their society, though notably without justifying the tradition. Rather, he focuses on the people of other villages and the tradition as self-evident, both logical fallacies. The first argument he makes in favor of continuing to have a lottery is an ad
In “The Lottery” one of the famous Shirley Johnson’s stories has captured the readers worldwide. However, numerous people were unable to solve this puzzling question that has readers wondering for years. “Why forcing to stick with original tradition has been wrong and if people would love to break that tradition or not?” and it’s that same question that remains unsolved, until now. This story shows a quantity of significant clues that might enlighten us on why that’s the cause. These 3 significant clues could be this as follows: traditions alter over time, people occasionally don’t notice the alterations, and ignorance is death. The tradition that the town’s people were doing in this story has been wrong and it has been awfully cruel considering
In “The Lottery,” the town put so much importance on tradition. As the townspeople were getting ready, Mr. Summers said, “Guess we better get started, get this over with…” (Jackson 2). Even though the town is getting ready to do the lottery, the people do not like to do it. This is very odd because if people do not like to do something, people tend to stop doing the activity.
There are regions in parts of the globe that take part in normal activities that, here in the United States, would be considered completely abnormal, even inhumane. Yet, traditional ties sewn into a cultural realm deems certain events, such as “the lottery”, to be well within the bounds of socially acceptable. Old Man Warner epitomizes the relevance of the power of tradition in this short story, and the symbol that takes shape from it. A veteran of seventy-seven years in the lottery, he snorts at the idea of giving it up. “Nothing but trouble in that… Pack of young fools,” he says when it is mentioned that some towns have given it up. “Listening to the young folks, nothing’s good enough for them. Next thing you know they’ll be wanting to go back to living in caves, nobody work anymore…” he spouts off, illogically. The lottery was so steeped in the town’s traditional makeup that even the barbaric physical act of killing someone with stones was not the least bit
The lottery is a fictional story of blindly following an old tradition, in this case to have rain fall for a good crop and harvest that year, people once a year coming together and drawing their fate if they would be sacrificed that year. This is a social problem due to blindly following from sheep mentality even stoning your own mother near the end where, “someone gave little Davy Hutchinson a few pebbles.” A small child was just carelessly asked or even encouraged to do so. The shock factor from the villagers seeing themselves as free from guilt because of the blind drawing where no one person could be at fault is a little disturbing, no one is questioning the tradition because no single person feels it is their own personal issue with murdering an innocent person. They even feel like they are obligated, running up and being even slightly enthusiastic about it, “Delacroix selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands and turned to Mrs. Dunbar. “Come on,” she said. “Hurry up.”
The author of “The Lottery” wrote this story “to shock the story’s readers with a graphic demonstration of the pointless violence and general inhumanity in their own lives” (Jackson 211). This story reflects human behavior in society to show how although rules, laws or traditions do not make sense, people follow them. Throughout the story the three main symbols of how people blindly follow senseless traditions were the lottery itself, the color black, and the hesitation that people had towards the prize.
“The less there is to justify a traditional custom, the harder it is to get rid of it” (Twain). The Lottery begins during the summer. A small, seemingly normal, town is gathering to throw the annual “Lottery”. In the end, the townspeople—children included—gather around and stone the winner to death, simply because it was tradition. The story reveals how traditions can become outdated and ineffective. “I suppose, I hoped, by setting a particularly brutal ancient rite in the present and in my own village to shock the story's readers with a graphic dramatization of the pointless violence and general inhumanity in their own lives” (Jackson). As humans develop as a race, their practices should develop with them. Shirley Jackson develops the theme that blindly following traditions is dangerous in her short story “The Lottery” through the use of symbolism, foreshadowing, and irony.
Change. The first step of evolution in a society. Without change, history is bound to repeat itself. But (however?) with it we can grow to view things with a new perspective. One might wonder why humans are not more accepting of change. The answer is the fear of the unknown. In literature there are many symbols that represent how fear of change negatively impacts a society and its people. Shirley Jackson’s short story The Lottery introduces us to such a society. Every year on June 27th the lottery is held. The villagers come together, in the town square, to select one individual as the winner of the lottery. Unbeknownst to the reader, until the end of the short story, the prize the winner receives is death by stoning. The time has come again
in our Society often have a fear of being victimized by others, such as the
In Shirley Jackson’s short story “The Lottery”, she begins setting up conflict from the very first sentence. Jackson starts off by setting a beautiful scene of a clear and sunny day with green grass and blooming flowers as the backdrop for a horrific process, the lottery. The lottery is a long-standing tradition in the town and causes the members of the community to choose the love of family and friends or to conform to society expectations. The tradition is so entrenched that the community blindly accepts the lottery and allows a ritual murder to occur year after year. Through this tradition, Jackson sets up conflict in many different ways throughout the story.
The Lottery is a story filled with rituals and traditions. The problem with traditions is we will often continue in them without even knowing why we do them to begin with. In the case of the villagers, the lottery had been going on for longer than any of them had been alive. Jackson illustrates in the story that it started so long ago that the equipment first use had long since been lost (Pg. 258 para. 5). The people of the village are very set in their ways; when the topic of change comes up they are very quick to dismiss it as foolishness. This mindset shows up multiple times throughout the story. Towards the beginning of the story, the black box used for the lottery is mentioned and it is indicated that "Mr. Summers spoke frequently to the villagers about making a new box, but no one liked to upset even as much tradition as was represented by the black box" (pg 258-259 para. 5). The villagers for the most part didn't question the moral implications of the lottery; being born and raised into the lottery it's all they ever knew. They had little knowledge of any other way things could be to serve as their moral compass. The story reminds me of a similar situation from my childhood. As a child I used to spend a lot of time around my grandfather Jay. He was born and raised in Arkansas in the 1920's. Being...