Bystander Intervention Model

With the utilization of the internet search engine Bing, I was able to pursue a Pennsylvania State University source from the electronically published brochure Policies Safety & U: 2017 Annual Security Report and Annual Fire Safety Report in PDF form, updated on September 28th. As a well-established institution, Penn State has an accredited reputation that accumulated over the course of the last century and a half, dedicated to education, research, and serving the public through various ways. The current information gives insight into the procedure of the esteemed institution, in addition to other links and sources that can supplement the discussion topic. Being a periodically issued document to all students of the University, it states non-biased procedures, actions to take in case of an emergency, and moreover, crucial information leading to external resources to assist the enrolled scholars in various areas concerning Penn State.

By strategizing direct quotes and summarizing significant components of my argumentation, like that of explaining what the Green Dot Program reveals in addition to what the ‘green’ and ‘red’ dots denote.

I will also describe how “Stand for State is Penn State’s bystander intervention program focusing on sexual and relationship violence, mental health concerns, acts of bias, and risky drinking and drug use based on Green Dot’s bystander intervention model." In addition to that citation, I would state the in just one year, "Stand for State Action Week generated 13,128 proactive green dots across the University," (“Policies, Safety & U” p. 13). With my application of the Penn State’s annual report, I will be able to provide my audience with an ample perception of why I am erecting these claims and further their engagement with an authentic use of my college’s strategies to introduce an existing issue across the

nation.
Another electronically published file that I will employ is the Journal of Interpersonal Violence Understanding Rape and Sexual Assault: 20 Years of Progress and Future, Vol. 20 No. 1, January 2005 p. 127-131, written by Rebecca Campbell of Michigan State University and Sharon M. Wasco of the University of Massachusetts–Lowell. Published by Sage Publication Inc on the part of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children also known as APSAC, the article explains research from the past twenty years on the matter of rape in America. Affiliated with multiple reports, Prof. Rebecca Campbell compassed her fields of study on violence against women and children, with an emphasis on sexual assault. When reviewing Prof. Sharon Wasco, you receive results from various publications to which she contributed, like that of the Understanding Rape and Sexual Assault. Organized by two well-respected psychology professors from independent universities, the column features studies commenced over the last two decades on the social growth of sexual assault. The piece also includes its own resources section to review their inferences.
As with my application of my previous reference, Penn State's Policies Safety & U, I will incorporate direct quotations to strengthen my stance. Using such extracts of the information explaining that "the impact of sexual assault extends far beyond rape survivors as their family, friends, and significant others are also negatively affected," (Campbell & Wasco, 2005 p. 127). Applying this Journal will present my audience with the indication that sexual assault does not only affect the person or people immediately involved but the environment surrounding them as well, in addition to promoting them with the realization that sexual violence is a national epidemic.