By Mollycoddling Our Children Rhetorical Analysis

1572 Words4 Pages

In "By mollycoddling our children, we're fuelling mental illness in teenagers" by Jonathan Haidt and Pamela Paresky, the authors effectively utilize ethos, logos, and pathos to construct a compelling argument about the detrimental effects of overprotective parenting on teenagers' mental health. They establish credibility through their expertise in psychology and human development, provide logical reasoning supported by empirical evidence, and evoke empathy for the well-being of young individuals. However, while the authors effectively employ these rhetorical strategies, there are areas where their argument could be further strengthened, such as providing more concrete examples and addressing potential counterarguments. Their article provides valuable insights into …show more content…

The writers utilize value appeals effectively throughout the article, appealing to the audience's concern for the well-being and development of children and teenagers. One value that the writers emphasize is the importance of resilience and mental strength in children. They argue that by overprotecting children and shielding them from stressors, parents are hindering their ability to develop resilience and cope with challenges later in life. This aligns with the audience's likely value of preparing children to handle adversity and become independent individuals. For example, the writers assert, "But brief periods of normal stress are not harmful; they are essential," emphasizing the importance of exposing children to manageable stressors to foster their resilience. Additionally, the writers suggest that the current trend of overprotection may stem from misplaced priorities, such as an excessive focus on physical safety at the expense of emotional and social

More about By Mollycoddling Our Children Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document