Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of bureaucracy
Strengths and weaknesses of bureaucracy
Advantages of federal system of government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of bureaucracy
The United States of America is an ever growing country with thousands of contrasting views that all want to be heard, policies to be made, and laws to be kept. For one person to hold all of this power would be absurd and next to impossible. That is why there is a checks and balances system which helps evenly distribute the power between the three branches of government. But what about the extensive unofficial fourth branch that George Washington created to aide the President? The Bureaucracy is a slow and seemingly unnecessary addition to our governmental system, but it does have an important role. The Bureaucracy was originally created to aide the president, and consisted of four people (first cabinet). These members were called the Department
So like Congress, the Bureaucracy is designed to be slow and stagnant. The slowness ensures that all possibilities of negative and positive outcomes are factored in and that the final product reflects what the American citizens truly want. The slowness of the process can lead to the mediocre and sometimes negative view that many Americans have of the Bureaucracy. There are many agencies that contribute to the Bureaucracy, and each agency works for their own purposes of bettering some aspect of the US. Many Americans think that speed is the most important thing when it comes to solving issues, but diligence and care need to be a priority. With such a large number of people involved with the Bureaucracy, it is not difficult for one member to be corrupted and influence others. People are people and sadly greed is a strong influence, along with personal beliefs. But the efficiency of the Bureaucracy is just as easily affected by these aspects as Congress and the Senate
This is because the members of the Bureaucracy are appointed, not elected. There is an understandable reason for the citizens who despise this undemocratic way, but the electoral college is not voted on by the people and it functions just as successfully. There is a possibility of further corruption due to the selection process. The American citizens cannot act as a wall between corrupted officials and their offices, which could allow an agency that deals with regulating things such as health and safety to slack off or make contradictory decisions. However, there is a way to keep this in check which is by having the committees in Congress keep track of the agency’s agenda and to hold hearings on agency abuse if need be. There is plenty of frustration to be heard of from the American citizens, but the government was designed to be slow and inefficient, so that all policies are made fairly and citizens can maintain their freedoms. The Bureaucracy is just an informal fourth branch of the government that serves as another check on the powers of each branch. There are many pros and cons to the current situation that the government has found itself in, but the Framers knew that rash decisions could and would be made, and this was their way of keeping
The overall theme of Government's End, Why Washington Stopped Working by Jonathan Rauch is one of calling for a reform for the way in which the modern government is operated. I believe that the overall feel of the book is not so much that Jonathan Rauch has a problem with what the government can not get done, but rather what the government can not get undone. The feeling to the book is that the government is a slow giant that will not change its ways. His analyses of the government of being slow and not a whole bunch gets done is very correct. The Founders of this great country did not want a government where laws and regulations could be easily passed and put into place. The Founders had just fought with their lives against a government where the ultimate say, came down to a single person. This is the very reason why the Founders created a system of checks and balances, to ensure that no one person or group could influence and pass laws that would benefit just one group instead of the nation as a whole. So in short, with Rauch's belief that the government is a giant, he is very true.
Mann and Norman J. Ornstein argue that the Legislative branch is the most broken branch of government. Congress was designed by the Framers of the Constitution of the United States to be an independent and powerful party. The Framers wanted the Legislative branch to represent the vast diversity of people of the United States, to deliberate on important issues and policies, and to check and balance the other branches. However, Congress’s role in the American Constitutional System differs from the part it was meant to play. The authors argue that Congress has failed to fill its responsibilities to the people of the United States because of the division of the Democratic and Republican parties, which leaves little room for compromise and negotiation. Members of Congress focus on their own needs and interests, and will travel to far lengths to prove that their political party is the most powerful. Congress has turned a blind eye to the needs of the American people. Congress cannot succeed in getting the United States back on track unless they start to follow the rules dictated by the Framers of the Constitution. A vast series of decisions made by Congress, driven by Congress’s disregard for institutional procedures, its tendency to focus on personal ethics, and the overpowering culture of corruption, led to Congress failing to implement important changes in the United States
The government of the United States of America is very unique. While many Americans complain about high taxes and Big Brother keeping too close an eye, the truth is that American government, compared to most foreign democracies, is very limited in power and scope. One area American government differs greatly from others is its scope of public policy. Americans desire limited public policy, a result of several components of American ideology, the most important being our desire for individuality and equal opportunity for all citizens. There are many possible explanations for the reason Americans think this way, including the personality of the immigrants who fled here, our physical isolation from other countries, and the diversity of the American population.
"This inquiry will naturally divide itself into three branches- the objects to be provided for by a federal government, the quantity of power necessary to the accomplishment of those objects, the persons whom that power ought to operate," writes Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist #23 in reference to the separation of powers. The basic concept here is the idea of the federal government being divided into three separate branches that would balance excessive democracy through a system of checks on each other. The three branches, respectively known as the legislature (Article I), the executive (Article II), and the judiciary (Article III), were designed to entice the opponents of the Co...
...nd executive branches have yet to realize that neither reshuffling power nor changing rules is the answer. It is pointless to take a process that needs to be restructured and add new layers to it. Despite the many changes, its use as a political tool has remained. It is an instrument of control and subject to the politics of the President and Congress.
The United States of America is often touted as the guiding beacon of democracy for the entirety of the modern world. In spite of this tremendous responsibility the political system of the United States retains some aspects which upon examination appear to be significantly undemocratic. Perhaps the most perplexing and oft misunderstood of these establishments is the process of electing the president and the institution known as the Electoral College. The puzzle of the Electoral College presents the American people with a unique conundrum as the mark of any true democracy is the citizens’ ability to elect their own ruling officials. Unfortunately, the Electoral College system dilutes this essential capacity by introducing an election by
The founding fathers of the American Constitution divided the government up into the following three branches to prevent the majority from ruling with an iron fist; legislative, judicial, and executive. The three braches were created by the Constitution: Article 1, Legislative branch made up of the House and the Senate, collectively known as Congress; Article 2, Executive branch, or President; Article 3, Judicial branch, made up of the federal courts and the Supreme Court. This was done in efforts to distribute power amongst the three so that one would not have more power than the other. Each branch has the ability to check the power of the other branches. This power check of the other branches is referred to as the checks and balances, better known as the Separation of Powers. This was to prevent tyriny.
Three of the most important contributions these men gave were the theory of the separation of powers, the creation of the cabinet, and the two term precedent. James Madison held much foresight as he studied all functioning governments, then created an unimaginable, unthinkable new government where every branch was equal. Madison invented a form of government that put checks and balances on each branch of government. Originally in British government, the executive branch had authority and power in both the judicial and legislative branches. Madison found that no one branch should have authority over another and established a system of checks and balances. This system ensured that one branch could not dominate over others. Not only was Madison a vital character in the formation of American government, but George Washington also left an important imprint on the United States today. As first president of the new nation, Washington set many precedents that have endured through every presidential term today. As first president, George Washington knew he could not oversee the executive branch alone. Washington first made a cabinet, appointing well established men that set many expectations for future cabinet members. Each man held an important job in an executive department, lessening the workload on Washington. The cabinet members met
In my opinion, the relationship between the Federal government and the States is unclear whether which institution has the authority to implement legislations. The vagueness of the American constitution particularly in the 10th Amendment of the Constitution that quote ” The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” The ambiguous of the American Constitution may be the main cause of the over power of Federal government.
Modern Bureaucracy in the United States serves to administer, gather information, conduct investigations, regulate, and license. Once set up, a bureaucracy is inherently conservative. The reason the bureaucracy was initiated may not continue to exist as a need in the future. The need or reason may change with a change in the times and the culture needs. A bureaucracy tends to make decisions that protect it and further it’s own existence, possibly apart from the wishes of the populace. It may not consistently reflect what might be optimal in terms of the needs and wants of the people. Local governments employ most of the United States civil servants. The 14 cabinet departments in the U.S. are run day-to-day by career civil servants, which have a great deal of discretionary authority.
When the constitution of the United States was formed, the framers specifically designed the American Government structure to have checks and balances and democracy. To avoid autocracy the President was give power to preside over the executive branch of the government and as commander –in –chief, in which a clause was put into place to give the president the power to appeal any sudden attacks against America, without waiting for a vote from congress. While the president presides over the executive branch there has been ongoing debate over the role of the president in regards to foreign policy. Should foreign policy issues be an executive function by the president or should congress play a much greater role? With the sluggishness of our democracy, foreign policy issues most times need quicker response compared to how domestic policy is decided in the United States. Many believe to maintain openness and democracy both the president and congress need to agree on how the United States handles issue abroad. Although the president has been given much power, his or her power and decisions are sometimes limited based on decisions by congress and challenged and shaped by various bureaucracies throughout the government system. I shall discuss the Presidents role and the role of governmental bureaucracies (Department of Defense, Department of State and the National Security Council) that work together and sometimes not together to shape and implement American foreign Policy.
The United States is governed by a democracy. According to Dictoinary.com, democracy is “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system” (Dictoinary.com). This means that instead of having a supreme ruler, the citizens of a country have the right to vote for and choose their elected officials who will ultimately make the decisions for them. The benefit of a democracy is that depending on the public’s opinion, they can influence the government to run the way they want. This form of government provided the public with a great amount of freedom, yet is can potentially slow down the efficiency of governmental decisions. In order for a democracy to function well, public opinions must be somewhat similar to avoid gridlock. A democracy is good for public freedom, but must possess certain characteristics to provide effective results.
The legislative, executive, and judicial branches represent the constitutional infrastructure foreseen by the Founding Fathers for our nation 's governing body. Together, they work to maintain a system of lawmaking and administration based on checks and balances, and separation of powers intended to make certain that no individual or embodiment of government ever becomes too controlling. America is governed by a democratic government or a democracy which is a government by the people, in which the power is established in the people themselves. The people then elect representatives who carry out their power in a free electoral system. The United States government’s basic claim is to serve the people and only through a combined effort can we
The effectiveness of our democracy lies in our protection of the separation of powers. Over time, power has slowly shifted to the executive branch. In 1933, presidential emergency powers were considered, “There were real calls…for Franklin Roosevelt to seize dictatorial powers in order to deal with the Great Depression.” (1) In this state, total power was offered to one man. Roosevelt declined the offer but still violated Constitutional laws. Clearly, our democratic system was too slow of a process and was ineffective in getting things done. But, in government, when something is done once, it becomes more acceptable. Power was given
To be frank, I am conflicted as to whether or not bureaucracy dehumanizes a person or not. I don’t entirely believe that bureaucracy was