Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects eugenics has on society
The downfall of eugenics on society
The downfall of eugenics on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects eugenics has on society
In 1927, there was an infamous Supreme Court case in Virginia that would be controversial and affect the lives of the mentally ill for many years. This was known as the case, Buck v Bell, which ruled in the favor of the sterilization of Carrie Buck, who was deemed “mentally unfit” to reproduce (Caldwell 1). Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. ruled that it did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment and quotes that “three generations of imbeciles are enough” (Wright 1). This court case led to an improper decision for Carrie Buck due to a law that negatively impacted the entire United States because it limited the rights of mentally challenged citizens in history for a large part of the remainder of the twentieth century. In 1924, the Eugenical …show more content…
Sterilization Act was passed and Virginia Colony officials wanted to test the new laws legality on Carrie Buck, a young “feebleminded” woman who gave birth to an illegitimate child (Caldwell 1).
A fact that was never brought up during the court cases was that Buck’s pregnancy was because she was raped by a nephew of the foster parents. Buck’s mother, Emma Buck, was also accused of having hereditary traits of illegitimacy. The right to enforce sterilization was first challenged in the Circuit Court of Amherst County (Caldwell 3). In court, Buck was in trail against Albert Priddy, the Virginia Colony’s superintendent, and Aubrey E. Strode, the man who established the Sterilization Act. Irving P. Whitehead was Buck’s unjust attorney, who provided a weak defense for Buck, because Whitehead knew Priddy and Strode personally, professionally, and politically for many years. Whitehead did not call any witnesses during the trial while Strode called four “expert” witnesses to prove that Buck was feebleminded (Caldwell 3). The Amherst County Circuit Court declared the lawfulness of the Sterilization Act and the case then went to the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. Priddy died in January 13, 1925 before appeals have decided to hear the case and Dr. John H. Bell took his place as superintendent. Later that year, the Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals agreed with the …show more content…
ruling of the Amherst County Circuit Court. Thus, a petition of judicial writ was filled and submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard the oral arguments on April 22, and on May 2, 1927, they made the decision to sterilize Carrie Buck 8 to 1 and upheld the law that permitted it. Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. reckoned on the previous Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1904) case and the experts of Buck’s first trial led the Chief Justice to announce that “Three generations of imbeciles are enough” (Caldwell 4). Carrie Buck was later sterilized on October 19 that same year, but Buck was unaware until 1980. Moreover, she was not taken back by her foster family where her child, Vivian, was being raised. Throughout history of American law, there was no other case like Buck v.
Bell. It was the first time the Supreme Court order someone to be operated, who did not want to be operated. This case was based of false facts, false theories, and false science. Eugenics was first started in England by a man named Francis Galton, a half-cousin of Charles Darwin, developed the concept of eugenics that could improve the gene pool from future generations of physically or mentally disabled (Wright 2). Eugenicists believed that if two people of healthy genes reproduced, and the ones with improper genes did not, then it would improve humanity from disability. Eugenics was greatly adopted by the leaders in America including Theodore Roosevelt and Alexander Graham Bell. Theodore Roosevelt after leaving the White House states, “I wish very much that the wrong people could be prevented entirely from breeding… Feeble-minded persons [should be] forbidden to leave offspring behind them” (Roy 1). Many universities, including Harvard, began offering classes in eugenics as it began to have been a form of incompetence prevention. The case was used as a model to look back to for not only the United states, but all over the world. For example, Adolf Hitler studied eugenics and even published a book known as “Mein Kamph” which proved his deep understanding of American eugenics. Thus, led to the rise of the Nazi Regime sponsoring research and passing laws that eliminated genetic problems such as birth
defects. The Nazis followed America in eugenic sterilization. There was cooperation between the American eugenicist and scientists with the Nazis which led them to sterilize as much as 370,000 people (Lombardo 1). When the Nazis leaders are trialed at Nuremberg, they Nazis cite back to what America’s Supreme Court stated that sterilization was constitutional from the words of Chief Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. Carrie Buck was wrongfully accused of being feebleminded. One of the ways she was tested was through poor IQ testing that did not test intelligence properly. One of the questions she was asked was, “What do you do when a playmate hits you?”, which is not a proper or relevant to the ideal IQ test question (Cohen 1). The Virginia Colony appointed Irving P. Whitehead as Buck’s lawyer, who clearly nor on her side, because he had good relationships with Albert Priddy and Aubrey E. Strode and wanted to see Buck sterilized. During the 1920s, The American Civil Liberties Union was mostly pro-eugenics and there were no advocacy groups to defend people like Buck (Cohen 3). The only Supreme Court Justice who sided with Buck was Catholic. The Catholic people were the ones who oppose the eugenics law. They do not want people to be judged by their physical characteristics and incapabilities, but rather who they are on the inside. During Carrie Buck’s old age, many people who knew her stated that she was not feebleminded because she would do activities such as working on puzzles and reading the newspaper. It was not until 1974 that Virginia had repealed the sterilization law of 1924. Recently, the state of Virginia decided to compensate those who were wrongfully sterilized with $25,000 but many have already died before they could receive it. Buck v. Bell was a case that was dealt with improper evidence, framed defense, and false theories which caused one of the worst decisions in U.S history. This court case led to an improper decision for Carrie Buck due to a law that negatively impacted the entire United States because it limited the rights of mentally challenged citizens in history for a large part of the remainder of the twentieth century. It showed how powerful our government leader’s beliefs can have on a minority group of individuals, and how something that is popular with many individuals, is not always moral.
Everyone should be treated equally, should get support and care equally. “Schizophrenic. Killer. My Cousin.” is a true story published on Mother Jones on May-June 2013 issue (non profit organization article) by Mac McClelland. McClelland was formerly Mother Jones’ human rights reporter and writer of “The Rights Stuff”. In it she, talks about her cousin Houston, who had mental illness and at his age of 22 he stabbed his father 60 times with four different knives. Mac McClelland’s aunt Terri also suffered from mental illness at the age of 16. Aunt Terri and Houston were diagnosed with schizophrenia, a brain disorder in which people see reality abnormally. McClelland’s thesis states that well staffed hospital and properly administered antipsychotic medications would have helped Houston like how it did for Terri. The
House v. Bell, 547 U.S. 518 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case, which originated out of a Tennessee trial court murder conviction and death sentence (Neubauer & Fradella, 2008). The case started with the murder of Carolyn Muncey late on the night of July 14, 1985, or in the early morning hours of July 15, 1985. Muncey disappeared from her home, and was found dead the next day, with her body having been dumped down an embankment and covered with brush and limbs. The defendant, Paul Gregory House, was seen in the area of the body dump site, on July 15, 1985, carrying a black rag, and reportedly coming up the embankment, in the area where Muncey’s body was later located (House v. Bell, 2006). Evidence collected from the body of
US Supreme Court in 1927, in the case Buck v. Bell put a legal example that states can sterilize public institutions inmates (Lombardo, 2009). The argument of the court was that epilepsy, feeblemindedness, and imbecility are hereditary and it was important to the inmates from passing these defects to other generations. May 2nd 1927, the court ordered Buck Carrie, whom it referred as a feebleminded daughter to get sterilization following the 1924 Virginia act of Eugenical Sterilization. Carrie had a feebleminded daughter and her mother was feebleminded too. The case determined that obligatory sterilization laws did not infringe the due process given by the US constitution 14th amendment. It established the legal mandate and bolstered US eugenics movement for sterilizing over 60,000 citizens in over thirty states. Most of these practices ended in 1970s (Reilly, 1991).
In the book “The Mad Among Us-A History of the Care of American’s Mentally Ill,” the author Gerald Grob, tells a very detailed accounting of how our mental health system in the United States has struggled to understand and treat the mentally ill population. It covers the many different approaches that leaders in the field of mental health at the time used but reading it was like trying to read a food label. It is regurgitated in a manner that while all of the facts are there, it lacks any sense humanity. While this may be more of a comment on the author or the style of the author, it also is telling of the method in which much of the policy and practice has come to be. It is hard to put together without some sense of a story to support the action.
The American Eugenics Movement was led by Charles Davenport and was a social agenda to breed out undesirable traits with an aim of racial purification. Eugenics was a used to breed out the worst and weakest to improve the genetic composition of the human race, and advocated for selective breeding to achieve this. The science of eugenics rested on simple mendelian genetics, which was a mistake because they were assuming complex behaviors could be reduced to simple mendelian genes. After Nazi Germany adopted the ideas behind the American eugenics movement to promote the Aryan race, the eugenics movement was completely discredited.
On June 7th 1965, married couples in the State of Connecticut received the right to acquire and benefit from contraceptive devises. In a majority decision by the United States Supreme Court, seven out of the nine judges believed that sections 53-32 and 54-196 of the General Statues of Connecticut , violated the right of privacy guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. The case set precedence by establishing marital (and later constitutional) privacy, and had notable influence on three later controversial ruling=s in Roe v. Wade (1973), Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) and Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992) . The issue at hand was, and is still, one that still causes debate, wether a state has the authority to restrict the use and sale of contraceptives. Though it is not contraceptives, anymore, that is at the heart of the abortion debate, this ruling was the first step to the expectation of constitutional privacy.
“The Great Depression was a worldwide economic slump of the 1930’s” (Fetzer; p.338). The Great Depression caused a catastrophic amount of grief and distress for the citizens of the United States. Some of these citizens, however, faced more problems which caused grief and distress than others. Among those citizens were the mentally ill. During the era of the Great Depression, the mentally handicapped were treated unfairly in almost every aspect of their lives; this included how society treated them, how they were treated medically, and even how their personal lives were affected.
In 1971, Norma McCorvey or Jane Roe, filled a case against the district attorney of Dallas County, Henry Wade, because he enforced a Texas law that prohibited abortion unless the abortion was needed medically, to save the mother’s life. Being a single, pregnant woman , Roe did not have the choice to have an abortion because the pregnancy was not endangering her life. Plus, Roe could not afford to travel to have the operation done safely. As a result, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington, two lawyers that graduated from the University of Texas Law School, claimed a lawsuit against the abortion laws in Texas because they violated Roe’s constitutional rights. Besides Roe’s two laywers, Hallford, a licensed physician, and a childless married couple known as the Does supported Roe’s case. The lawsuit against Wade was filed in a Texas Federal Court. The Texas Federal Court heard the case on December 13th, 1971 and again, on October 11th, 1972. After the examination of Weddington and Coffee’s argument against Jay Floyd’s, the lawyer for Wade during the first argument, and Robert C. Flower’s, the lawyer for Texas in the second argument, the court ruled in Roe’s favor by claiming that the law did violate the Constitution. Consequently, Wade appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The case that I decided to write about is one of the most controversial cases that have ever happened in the United States. The Roe v. Wade (1973) case decided that a woman with her doctor could choose to have an abortion during the early months of that pregnancy. However, if the woman chose to wait until the later months of the pregnancy then they would have certain restrictions based on their right to privacy. This case invalidated all state laws which limited women’s access to abortions during their first trimester of their pregnancy which was based on the Ninth Amendment of the Constitution. The Amendment states that “the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people” (Cornell University Law School, 2013).
To solve this he made a new wave of propaganda “through newspapers, radios, and films” (“Introduction to Nazi Euthanasia”). The colorful commercials covered what would soon become the first mass murder program for the Nazi’s (“Euthanasia Program”). The commercials said that the “program would benefit society by not allowing “inferior people” to be produced and getting a lot more “superior people” in return” (“Introduction to Nazi Euthanasia”). The program was derived from Darwin’s Theories of Evolution (“Introduction to Nazi Euthanasia”). A new field of science called eugenics was created and helped to make the program seem more credible. Eugenics was defined as the “science of the improvement of the human race by better breeding” (“Introduction to Nazi Euthanasia”). The first eugenics institute was at the University College of London (“Introduction to Nazi Euthanasia”). The public believed that Euthanasia was a good thing and Hitler was able to put the killings into
As time goes on, the law has put more emphasis on facility just like Bridgewater State Hospital in which many of the actions of the facility workers can face legal consequences such as facing prison time, fines, lawsuits, and etc. Society has a better understanding of why certain people act the way that they do and being more knowledgeable about psychology and mental diseases allows us to have a different approach when dealing with these topics or these individuals. In today’s era, there are many normal individuals who are willing to stand up for those who do not have a voice of their own. I believe that this change in one’s ability to stand up for another individual or group of individuals is what brought about change to the medical environment of those who are mentally
Such precedent setting decisions are usually derived from the social, economic, political, and legal philosophy of the majority of the Justices who make up the Court, and also represent a segment of the American population at a given time in history. Seldom has a Supreme Court decision sliced so deeply into the basic fabric that composes the tapestry and direction of American law or instigated such profound changes in cherished rights, values, and personal prerogatives of individuals: the right to privacy, the structure of the family, the status of medical technology and its impact upon law and life, and the authority of state governments to protect the lives of their citizens.(3-4)
The eugenics movement started in the early 1900s and was adopted by doctors and the general public during the 1920s. The movement aimed to create a better society through the monitoring of genetic traits through selective heredity. Over time, eugenics took on two different views. Supporters of positive eugenics believed in promoting childbearing by a class who was “genetically superior.” On the contrary, proponents of negative eugenics tried to monitor society’s flaws through the sterilization of the “inferior.”
In June of 1924, Carrie Buck, an 18 year old Charlottesville native, was hospitalized by her adopted family for being “feeble minded” after the birth of her illegitimate child. Bucks birth mother, Emma Harlowe Buck, was reported to also be mentally ill. She and Carrie both had children out of wedlock, and were both committed to the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble-Minded, so their illnesses could not be passed on even more. This fear of eugenics caused Carrie Buck’s doctor, Albert Priddy, to request Carrie’s sterilization. While the request for Buck's sterilization was moving through the courts it was discovered that Carrie was not put away for being “feeble minded”. Her adopted family had put Carrie in the hospital in order to save their reputation after a member of the family had raped Carrie, causing her pregnancy. Carrie and Emma appealed to
In the year March 1970, a woman dubbed Jane Roe took federal action against Texas abortion laws. These laws prevented Roe from terminating her pregnancy because abortions were only allowed in the scenario that the fetus was harming the life of the mother (Rosenbaum 63). Because Roe wasn’t in any way harmed by her pregnancy, she could not get an abortion. “Roe believed that TX statutes were unconstitutionally vague and that they abridged her right of personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments” (Rosenbaum 64). She wanted an abortion done professionally in a clean and safe environment (Rosenbaum 63). Women before the legalization of abortion would resort to unsafe methods to terminate their baby (Tribe 113).