More handpicked essays just for you.
Brutus speech analysis essay
Comparison between brutus and antony speech
Rhetorical analysis of brutus speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brutus speech analysis essay
Brutus appeals to the audience's rationality, whereas Antony shows feelings toward their emotions. Brutus' rhetorical devices are sound but easy. He uses parallel structure to show you his point - "as he was valiant, I honor him; as he was ambitious, I slew him." He models himself as Caesar's best friend, believing that will help them see that the honor of the murder is divorced from emotional feelings. Antony, on the other hand, lays the irony on thick. He stipulates Brutus's honor, but then repeats the phrase "Brutus is an honorable man" rhythmically to stress that the opposite is in fact true. Lastly, Antony takes a dramatic pause to supposedly collect himself, though all is does is enflame the crowd. Lastly, Antony uses a document to
prove that Brutus's claims were incomplete. In short, he riles them up where Brutus believes they will 'listen to reason.' In Brutus's speech he tries to give a legitimate reason for killing Julius Caesar but Brutus might come off as a traitor, and he is, but he had a point to prove. He had claimed to killed Julius Caesar for the sake of Rome, as he put it. And his speech was effective as he stirred up a commotion among the people. But the reason that Marc Antony's speech is branded most effective is because while Brutus called on people's logic, Marc Antony played with the crowd's feelings and emotion.
By nature, the crowd of Romans will be more concerned with their personal safety than the death of their ruler. Antony appeals to his personal experiences and friendship with Caesar in a touching, personal, primarily pathetic argument; on the other hand, Brutus appeals to the Roman citizens directly by presenting himself as their protector against Caesar, a threat to their safety and liberty. Therefore, in terms of effectiveness, Brutus reaches his audience on a much more personal and convincing level with his argument than Antony was able to with his account of his friendship and life with
Antony asks rhetorical questions and lets the audience answer for themselves. Brutus uses ethos by stating that he a noble man and that is why the people should believe him but infact Antony questions his nobility by saying what Brutus said,” Brutus is an honourable man”(III.ii.79). In a way, Antony states what Brutus states to convince the audience by using examples that Brutus is wrong. Antony himself knows what kind of man Brutus is but lets the people figure it out on their own. In addition, Brutus uses logos by expressing that fact that Caesar died because of his ambition. This argument is severely under supported because his reasons are invalid and simply observations. Antony uses “did this in Caesar seem ambitious” to question Brutus’ argument (III.ii.82). Antony gives examples backing his argument like when Caesar refused the crown thrice to prove his humbleness. The way Antony convinces the people to rebel is by using pathos. He brings the audience in by stepping down to their level and showing them the body of Caesar. While Antony talks at Caesar's funeral, he pauses because” heart us in the coffin there with Caesar “(III.ii.98). When Antony becomes emotional, he reminds the audience about what injust event happened to the much loved
also a man of strong pride and self confidence which led to the fate of this
Brutus vs Antony The most predominate and important aspect in the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main characters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd, using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure, Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s. Both speakers used an ethical appeal to the crowd and established their credibility.
Antony and Brutus are both loyal, noble men and their loyalties shape their characters, drives their actions, and decides the very future of Rome. Brutus loves Caesar, but he loves Rome more. Antony has no need to choose between his country and best friend. Before Caesar's death both men are guarded and somewhat a secret to the reader. After Caesar's murder, however, their true personalities emerge. Antony and Brutus may seem the same, and that was they are in theory, from their positions, character traits, to the very friend's they keep they are alike almost to a point of absurdity. In practice, though, you will find them rather different due to the mistakes and decisions made by both parties.
Firstly, Antony says a general statement that, “the evil that men do lives after them” (III.ii.74), when in fact he is subtly and sneeringly referring to the conspirators actions. The Roman commoners don’t realize that this general statement is swaying them, but the rest of Antony’s speech further convinces them of the evil the conspirators have done. Later, Antony talks about Brutus says that “sure, [he] is an honourable man” (III.ii.98), emphasis on the sure. Because he uses a scornful tone while sarcastically saying this statement, he is really beginning to show the audience his true feelings on the situation. Knowing that even Antony bitterly disagrees with the choices of the conspirators, it further persuades the common people of Rome to turn against Brutus and the rest of Caesar’s murderers. These occasions show Antony’s sour tone, especially towards the conspirators, and Antony’s tone also riles up the Roman citizens. His tone helps to exasperate the commoners with Caesar’s murder, and therefore assists Antony in achieving his purpose to manipulate the audience to turn against
Mark Anthony and Brutus in the Aftermath of Caesar's Death In the immediate aftermath of Caesar's death, Mark Anthony sends a servant to Brutus with a message asking for 'vouchsafe that Anthony May safely come to him' without being killed. This shows that Mark Anthony believes that Brutus is noble and will keep his word and Mark Anthony trusts it. Brutus, naively, is quick to accept Mark Anthony as a friend saying, 'I know that we shall have him well to friend' indicating his lack of judgement because he feels that Mark Anthony will understand the reasons behind Caesar's murder. Brutus believes that Mark Anthony's love and loyalty for Caesar is outstripped by his love for Rome. Mark Anthony tries to convey this feeling when he praises Brutus by building up his trust and support.
Honor is an underlying foundation of Brutus and can be clearly seen during the play’s dramatic speeches. Brutus himself makes his honor apparent in his orations. After the assassination of Caesar and during the funeral speech, Brutus asks the people of Rome, “Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? If any, speak; for him I have offended”(act III, sc ii, ln 29-32). This in Brutus proves he is noble as he cares and protects the welfare of the people and Rome as a whole. He is torn between his sense of duty with Rome and his friendship with Caesar. In the end; however, he must rationalize his actions to save face and conform to both sides of his conflict. Furthermore, Brutus tries to prove his nobility to virtually everyone. When Brutus utters his last words, he tells Caesar his intentions, “I killed thee with half so good a will”(act V, sc v, ln 50-51). His honor is always persistent and never fails to prevail at even the most taxing and awkward situation. Brutus considers his honor in every aspect and choice in his life and often rules over his own accord. Accordingly, many people, including his enemies, were very m...
Throughout his speech, Antony repeats the words “[Caesar] was ambitious” and “Brutus is an honorable man” to create a contrast between the two statements. (3.2.95-96). Through this repetition, Caesar successfully undermines Brutus. Everytime he calls Brutus an honorable man, he lists a positive trait of Caesar that contradicts Brutus’s claim that he was too ambitious. He tells the crowd about the times when Caesar showed compassion for the people and when he refused the crown thrice. Antony’s sarcasm about Brutus’s honor brings into question as to whether his honor deserved. This leads the audience to doubt their feelings upon Caesar’s ambition. Near the end of his eulogy, Antony uses apostrophe when he claims that “judgment ... art fled to brutish beasts” as a reason for why the Roman people believe Brutus. (3.2.114-115). Antony indirectly shames the crowd for their belief in Brutus in that Caesar was a tyrant. Fearing alienation of the crowd, he attributes this belief to a lapse in judgement that beasts have taken. Antony also makes a pun upon Brutus’s name when he comments “brutish beasts.” Antony implies Brutus has caused a lapse in judgement within the Roman people through his oration
& respects the intelligence of the common people to understand a speech given in verse. Brutus's authoritative air is once again illustrated at the very opening line of his oration when he demands the attention of the people, "Romans, countrymen, and lovers, hear me for my / cause, and be silent, that you may hear. Believe me / for mine honor and have respect to mine honor, that / you may believe"(Act III, scene ii, lines 13-16). this one line, Antony uses Brutus's words to his advantage by changing them to make himself sound friendlier. By the very first word of Antony's speech, one can infer that he is about to give a humbling oration; he uses the ethical appeal to convince the people to believe in his cause rather than Brutus's. Finally, while the crowd is in awe of Brutus's raw power and booming authority, Antony uses sarcasm He is "an honorable man" (Act III, scene II, line 84) in a tone of biting mockery, therefore questioning Brutus's credibility. & nbsp; It is true that the Roman people have emotions that sway with the winds, but this is partly due to the great speaking skills of both Brutus and Mark Antony.
Brutus repeatedly says, “If any, speak, for him have I offended,” (III.ii.25). Brutus’ tactic is to try to force someone, or dare them, to disagree with him, which no one ends up doing. Brutus tries to make people fear him, which works for a brief period of time. Mark Antony, on the other hand, goes on the attack, rather than the defense, by repeatedly saying, “Yet Brutus said he was ambitious; And… he is an honourable man.” (III.ii.89-90). By going on the offensive side, Mark Antony uses the repetition of this extreme usage of irony and sarcasm to make the audience understand that all of this is Brutus’ fault and that he should be punished for his crimes, no matter his intentions. Both groups use similar rhetorical strategies to prove that Caesar should or should not be dead for what he has done, with differing results. Brutus and Mark Antony also use emotional appeals to persuade their audience that they are correct in the matter of the death of their esteemed
In Antony’s speech he repeatedly and sarcastically calls Brutus an honorable man. As it stands, Brutus is honorable as shown by how his funeral speech does not fall on deaf ears. The people understand his position because it is not an unreasonable one. Unlike the other conspirators, Brutus only wants to do what is best for Rome which, indeed, makes him honorable. However, Antony knows as well as anyone else that honor is no longer relevant. In his funeral speech, Antony proclaims, “For Brutus, as you know, was Caesar’s angel. / Judge, O you gods, how dearly Caesar loved him! / This was the most unkindest cut of all” (III.ii.193-195). Caesar had been an upright man just like Brutus and Brutus had murdered him. Majority rules and this majority agrees that murder is murder no matter who commits it or for what
“Someone should just stab caesar!”- Gretchen Weiners. And that is what cassius and brutus set out to do. The two men didn’t have much in common but they had a common goal, to kill julius caesar. Their similarities and their differences are what made their plan possible. Brutus being gullible and easy going made it easy for the cunning and persuasive cassius to persuade brutus that killing caesar was the right thing to do.
Julius is a play with ideas of persuasions. The whole play is mainly about persuasions. The difference of Anthony and Brutus is that Anthony shows emotions and Brutus is rather good with showing logic in the play. Anthony wants to carried Ceasurs body for his funeral speech for his death while Cassius is scared that he might do something to the body instead, but Brutus ignores her and they both got there speech going. Anthonys speech wasnt good at all because he would play with the crowds emotions, thats what hes good at. While Brutus speech was effective by his logic and straightforward. Brutus speech is usualy direct and precise and he always have confident on whats he has to say to the crowd of rome, while Anthony isn't most of the time
The theme for Julius Caesar is in conflict. Both Caesar and Brutus are in conflict with each other causing the theme of the novel to be in dire conflict. Due to both men being in conflict with each other neither one seems to be good or bad. They constantly get the civilians to turn on one another. Caesar is admired and loved at the beginning g of the novel due to his conquest to bring land and slaves in for Rome but Brutus however wins them over a little more than Caesar does causing the civilians to think of him as a tyrant and power hungry and with that causes much conflict within the novel.