Brown Vs. Emerson Ralph Waldo Emerson

587 Words2 Pages

Resilience: Compared and Contrasted; Brown v. Emerson Ralph Waldo Emerson's essay "Self-Reliance" delves into the notion of self-reliance as a fundamental aspect of individual empowerment and integrity. Emerson defines self-reliance as the ability to trust oneself, maintaining independent thought and action despite society’s pressure to conform. He attributes the significance of individuality, nonconformity, and integrity of mind as essential in achieving true greatness. Emerson contends that following one's own convictions, is crucial for self-reliance, even if it means being misunderstood or opposing conventional wisdom. According to him, self-reliance means accepting one's own nature and adhering to personal principles rather than maneuvring oneself to external …show more content…

Within this context, self-reliance is characterized by the ability to rely on one's inner resources and beliefs while also recognizing the significance of external support and interconnectedness. Resilience is measured as successful, concurrently with one’s ability to source from their surroundings, instead, as Emerson maintains, in spite of one’s social circle. In essence, both essays touch upon the concept of self-reliance, but they approach it from different perspectives. Emerson's essay underscores individual autonomy and nonconformity, portraying self-reliance as a personal journey of self-trust and authenticity. On the other hand, Brown’s essay aligns self-reliance as dependent upon variables outside of one’s self within the broader framework of resilience. These essays discuss the interplay between internal fortitude as solely necessary for success, and external connections as contributory in navigating life's challenges. Societal Expectations: Compared and Contrasted; Brown v.

Open Document