Section 285 of the Patent Act authorizes district courts to award attorney’s fees to the winning parties in cases deemed “exceptional.” In Brooks Furniture Manufacturing Inc. v Dutailier International Inc. the Federal Circuit Court defined an “exceptional” case as one that either involves “material inappropriate conduct” cite or one that is both “objectively baseless” and “brought in subjective bad faith.” cite
However, in April of 2014 the Supreme Court held that the framework set forth in Brooks Furniture was “unduly rigid and [that it] impermissibly encumbered the statutory grant of discretion to the District Courts” in Octane Fitness. cite The precedent set from Octane Fitness was such that a case could be exceptional if it “stands out from others with respect to the substantive strength of a party’s litigating position… or the unreasonable manner in which the case was litigated”. cite The court also established that the District Courts determine whether a case is “exceptional” in a case-by-case manner wherein the consideration of the “totality of [the] circumstances” is required. cite Lastly, the Supreme Court decision in Octane Fitness discarded the requirement of “clear and convincing” cite evidence in favor of a
…show more content…
“preponderance of evidence” standard. cite This change loosened the requirements in order to classify a case as “exceptional” in order to grant fee awards and left the determination up to the discretion of the District Court.
The amount of District Court opinions ruling a case exceptional and granting attorney fees has increased by a significant margin in the years since Octane Fitness. cite https://www.law360.com/articles/777116/notable-trends-in-post-octane-fitness-fee-awards With the loosening of the requirements to make a case “exceptional” a larger variety of situations can be classified as such. For example, even a failure to fully investigate the alleged reasoning for a plaintiff’s entitlement for damages could lead to the case being classified as “exceptional.”
cite A recent decision by the Federal Circuit in Checkpoint Systems Inc. v All-Tag Security to reverse the decision of the District Court to grant attorney fees to All-Tag has potentially placed reasonable restrictions on the discretion of the District Court. In Octane Fitness the Court ordered that the fee awards are not in place to serve “as a penalty for failure to win a patent infringement suit,” cite rather the purpose of the fee awards is to prevent a party from suffering a “gross injustice” cite of having to pay attorney fees for a case that was conducted in bad faith. In Checkpoint v All-Tag the District Court held that the case was exceptional because of the following reasons; the investigation of the tags was inadequate, some of the key opinions were dated, and Checkpoint Systems was said to have conducted their litigation with “improper motivation” cite as Checkpoint systems was supposed to have been trying to interfere with the business of All-Tag Security. Upon review for the second time by the Federal Circuit, it was ordered that the investigation of the tags was adequate because even though the star witness examined tags made in Switzerland not the ones from Belgium which were in question, the tags from Belgium were manufactured on machines that were imported from Switzerland. Thus, making the investigation valid. Due to the aforementioned, the litigation was then deemed to have a reasonable and good faith basis for bringing infringement action. This reversal establishes limitation on the District Court’s discretion. The Federal Circuit is eastablishing reasonable restrictions on what can be deemed as “exceptional.” The framework set forth by Octane Fitness was not abandoned by this reversal, rather it was looked at with more scrutiny from the Federal Circuit. Instead of declaring the case as exceptional because the exact tags in question were not the ones analyzed by the Checkpoint Systems key witness, the Federal Circuit allowed the witness’ testimony despite the minor error in the plaintiff’s litigation approach.
Consider your and the court’s response to the above question. Would your decision be different if it could be shown that, in a certain small,
In a Georgia Court, Timothy Foster was convicted of capital murder and penalized to death. During his trial, the State Court use peremptory challenges to strike all four black prospective jurors qualified to serve on the Jury. However, Foster argued that the use of these strikes was racially motivated, in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S.79. That led his claim to be rejected by the trial court, and the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed. The state courts rejected relief, and the Foster’s Batson claim had been adjudicated on direct appeal. Finally, his Batson claim had been failed by the court because it failed to show “any change in the facts sufficient to overcome”.
Et Al. United States Court of Appeals Eleventh Circuit. N.d. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University, n.d. Web. 10 May 2014.
In the early 2000’s Lowe’s was rapidly intensifying its presence nationwide. The company carried a varied assortment of home improvement products and catered to the needs of retail as well as commercial business customers. Lowe’s expanded their reach by acquiring a 41-store chain, Eagle Hardware and Garden, and engaging in a strategic alliance with HGTV to obtain a more profound existence in their market (Rouse, 2005). By 2004, Lowe’s operated almost 1,000 stores with plans to continue expansion across the nation (Rouse, 2005). The company has a core competency in helping customers meet their home improvement needs at a low price. In order to use this core competency to gain a competitive advantage, the company has focused on key functional strategies. To continue their success, Lowe’s must specifically focus on marketing, logistics, and human resource management strategies.
In today’s operational management arena, there are certain expectations from a managerial aspect that must be met in order to be successful. A comprehensive look at the Space Age Furniture Company will show exactly what the Materials Requirement Planning (MRP) calculations are for this company at present time and then take the information given in order to properly suggest ways to improve the sub-assemblies. In addition, there will be an analysis on the trade-offs between the overtime and inventory costs. A calculation will be made on the new MRP that will improve the base MRP. This paper will also compare and contrast the types of production processing to include the job shop, batch, repetitive, or continuous, and determine which the primary mode of operation should be and exactly why. A detailed description on how management can keep track of the job status and location during production will also be addressed. Finally, there will be a recommendation on they type of changes that need to occur that will be beneficial to the company and at the same time add value to the customer. This paper will conclude with summary of the major points.
In order for a client to successfully bring a legal malpractice suit they must show the required elements of legal malpractice which are “(1) an attorney-client relationship; (2) a duty owed to the client by the attorney to use such skill, prudence, and diligence as lawyers of ordinary skill and capacity possess in exercising and performing the tasks which they undertake; (3) a breach of that duty; (4) the breach being the proximate cause of the client's damages; and (5) actual loss or damage resulting from the negligence.” Mainor v. Nault, 101 P.3d 308, 310 (Nev. 2004).
This case is a good example that if you are going to petition a case (like Tracy ...
The process of the judging on this criteria goes like this: First, a business or organization that loses an appeal in the Us court system, they are allowed to file a petition, called a “cert petition” (Savage 981). These petitions explain in thirty pages or less the process, views, and decision of the case. These are then given to the Law Clerks, who create a “cert memo”. This is created when the Clerk rea...
"Summary of United States V. Emerson." FindLaw: Cases and Codes. Thomson Reuters. Web. 29 May 2010. .
Ricky Brown, Et al, v. State of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223, 65 USLW 2355 (1996)
Relatively recently in history the development of specialized, or problem-oriented, courts have assumed a predominate role in multiple areas. Three of the major ones discussed here include drug, mental health, and domestic violence courts. In 1996, the American Bar Association provided their interpretation of specialization, stating:
Americans file about 15 million lawsuits a year. (Cannell) A fourth of all lawsuits filed are either frivolous or fraudulent. Perhaps, the careless point of view about the seriousness of lawsuits is perpetuated by the false representation on the many law shows on TV, such as Ally McBeal and Law and Order, in which the case is neatly rapped up in an hour. In reality most court cases take about 19 months from start to finish.
... impressed in the time, cost, and emotional expense that went into such a case. Because of the reluctance for government entities to get involved, as well as the lies being told, Jan was left holding the bag. It was easy to see that Jan's ego, coupled with his big spending habit, didn't help his end result. However, I can also see the most frugal plaintiff's attorney end up in bankruptcy if he or she became just as passionate about a case.
Poor organizational management, failure to innovate and adapt to the environment, and an outdated brand image have all contributed to Sears massive decline. By not setting a clear organizational strategy, executives of Sears strayed away from innovation, allowing for competitors to attract Sears loyal customers to their organization. In addition, the outdated brand image of Sears has failed to meet the ever changing customers of today’s society. Overall, there are many reasons that have led to the downfall of a once powerful retail giant.
The purpose of this essay is analyze the case of IKEA, which has involved in the HR management. Meanwhile, choose two topics to identify the IKEA current situation, including training and development and cross-cultural management. From those two points, give some forward suggestions on the IKEA HR management practice.