Brock Turner Essay

Gender roles have been an issue for a long time, and men seem to present themselves to be more superior than women. This issue had led to many terrible events throughout history, and one event includes a young college study, Brock Turner. Brock Turner is a 22-year old college student who attended Stanford University where he was enrolled with a swimming scholarship. He has history of using extensive drug use, including LSD, ecstasy, marijuana extracts, and excessive alcohol; he was also arrested in 2014 for possession of alcohol while under legal age (Wilson, p.1, 2016). Turner and his friends were at a fraternity party one night, and this party is where the story begins.

Primarily, an innocent woman was at the same party that Turner and his

friends had gone to, and this woman was completely unconscious. She was not able to speak for herself and she was not able to defend herself. This woman was unconscious behind a dumpster; therefore, Brock Turner had raped this woman thinking it was acceptable. Two Swedish graduate students were biking by the fraternity house at Stanford when they saw Turner raping a half-naked woman behind a dumpster. The bikers confronted him and Turner was attempting to run away, but the bikers chased him down and tackled him. The bikers, Carl-Fredrik Arndt and Peter Jonsson, called the police, who arrived and arrested Turner (Andone, p.1, 2017). Turner was also intoxicated but reportedly remembered everything, while the victim remained unresponsive at the scene.
Moreover, this victim was then taken to the hospital, where she eventually regained consciousness.

This unnamed victim was a recent college graduate who was visiting her sister at Stanford University. The woman had originally intended to spend that night at home, but changed her mind to attend the fraternity party with her sister. When the hospital began a full examination, she had pine needles on her hair and body, as well as dried blood on her hands and elbows. The hospital also found abrasions and erythema on the victim’s skin. A nurse who administered a Sexual Assault Response Team examination at the hospital determined that victim had suffered significant and penetrating trauma (Lombardo, p.1, 2016). ENDING

SENTENCE
Following the situation that occurred, Brock Turner was now responsible as sexual assault. He withdrew from Stanford shortly after this situation to avoid disciplinary proceedings. The investigation began and he was taken into custody. Stanford announced that they had banned Turner from ever setting foot on campus again. The evidence found on this case was. DNA under Turner’s left finger of the victim’s skin. The DNA also showed blood from the victim’s body that resembles the blood found on the victim when she was hospitalized. Both the rapist and the victim were intoxicated at the time of the assault, with the woman’s blood-alcohol concentration three times the legal limit and Turner’s two times the limit (Lombardo, p.1, 2016). Therefore, the victim’s lawyer was stating she was not sober enough to give consent to Turner to have sex with her.
Likewise, Turner withdrew from Stanford after he was charged. The victim said she anticipated her rapist would admit to his actions and apologize to reach a settlement with her; however, Turner hired a defense team and went ahead with pursuing a trial. On January 27, 2015, Turner was arrested and charged with rape of an intoxicated person, rape of an unconscious person, sexual penetration of an unconscious woman, sexual penetration of an intoxicated woman, and assault with intent to commit rape. These charges were summarized as two counts of rape, two counts of penetration, and one count of assault with intent to rape (Grinberg, p.1, 2016). A couple months passed by and the trial ended, Turner was found guilty of three felonies: assault with intent to rape an intoxicated woman, sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object, and sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object. Once found guilty the judge has sentenced Turner for six months in jail and three years of probation; however, three months into his sentencing, he was released due to good behavior; he was then permanently registered as a se offender (Salam. p.1, 2017). This decision had frustrated many individuals in the society, people stated the judge was biased because of Brock Turner being a star male athlete.
As a final analysis, the issue presented in this trial what that a male rapist was able to walk away with just three months of jail time, while the women got no justice for her dignity.

The issues of gender roles come into play as soon as Turner was released from jail. Aaron Persky, the judge of this trial was then questioned for his legal right to continue dealing with legal cases due to his poor decisions to let this rapist walk free without any consequences (Sanchez, p.1, 2016). The victim wrote a heart wrenching letter explaining her loss in this case to Turner, and Turner’s father wrote a note stating that the women was asking for it and it was just a simple hook up (Wootson, p.1, 2017). This letter justifies the issue more because a man is stating that a woman was asking for it while she was drunk and

unconscious.
Furthermore, the values of this trial deals with the victim’s life, honesty, justice system, and professionalism. The victim’s life plays as a tremendous value in this case because the victim made a mistake that make young adults make throughout their early years of getting drunk. She has blacked out from drinking a great deal of alcohol. Instead of calling for help, Brock Turner saw this situation as an opportunity to simple “hook up” with someone. He stated in his trial he did have intentions to do so with another woman at the party. Following, honesty is a value because Turner was drunk; however, he was aware of what he was doing and his aware bouts. Therefore, since he knew what he was doing was wrong, he should have please guilty to deal with the moral consequences. Subsequently, professionalism and the justice system tie together as this case unraveled. The judge’s morals were questioned as well as his professionalism as he chose to take Tuner’s side just because he was a star athlete at an ivy league school. Finally, the justice system ties in with all of this because the jury had found his guilty; however, the judge’s bias decision let a rapist walk free with not justice served.
Incidentally, these values would be prioritized in the following way from most important to least important: justice system, victim’s life, honesty, and professionalism. These values must be prioritized like this because the justice system is the main focus in the presenting issue which was gender roles. The system sees a young smart athletic male and assumes this rape was just a silly mistake and lets his walk away from his mistake. The second biggest value would be the victim’s life of course because of the tragedy she now has to live through. Professionalism and honesty were both put last because they are crucial to this issue; however, they are also fixable mistakes. To clarify further, the judge should have been more professional with his decision making and Turner should have been honest with his wrong doings to give this trial true justice.
To conclude, the decision for this case that should be made is a re-trial. This re-trial should include another lawyer that does not have full information on the previous case and does not have a reputation on being biases towards certain genders. A full jury that does not know the case should be picked, and to avoid lying ask this question while in the process of picking the right candidates. The evidence of the blood DNA should be emphasized more in the case because DNA does not lie. A fair trial must be served for the victim’s relief; therefore, Brock Turner deserved jail time for his actions. Having him releases from jail comes along with the problem of other young men with a sense of pride thinking if they rape a female, they might get away with this situation. Justice needs to be served, not only for the victim of this case, but also for other rape victim’s because it will send a sense of hope for those women to know that the justice system is fair and equal.