Brinkmanship's Role In Resolving The Cuban Missile Crisis

980 Words2 Pages

The stakes were high, there was so much to lose. On October 16th 1962 the Cuban Missile Crisis began. The 13 day confrontation was possibly one the most intense conflicts in United States history. In response to the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion of 1961, and the presence of American Jupiter ballistic missiles in Italy and Turkey, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev decided to agree to Cuba's request to place nuclear missiles in Cuba to deter future harassment of Cuba. The U.S caught wind of what was happening and felt threatened under the new threat of missiles in Cuba. The best way to resolve the Cuban Missile Crisis was by using a form of “Back-Channel” or “Back-Door” Diplomacy

To Start off, publicly challenging the Soviet Union would harm any …show more content…

Brinkmanship is also known as “Big Talk” without affirmative action.. Brinkmanship is a game theory technique to make giant threats more credible. You do not threaten the certainty of nuclear war, but the possibility of one. As more and more people become involved in the crisis, it takes on a momentum of its own. The naval blockade of Cuba was an escalation that involved many more people into the decision making process. Also since a blockade is an aggressive action, the world moved further down a slippery slope where events could run out of control and result in events that no one wanted to happen. By involving more people than necessary Kennedy achieved his goal of making the threat more real. However, a tactic like this is extremely risky. Khrushchev could have ordered an attack the US because of the escalation of the situation. As a result the US could have been heavily

Open Document