Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Robots in the medical field
Robots in the medical field
Robots in the medical field
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Robots in the medical field
After watching “The Brave New World of Medical Robots (Improved Version)” speech and evaluating it, I saw many things that a good speech needs as well as things that can be left out to enhance the speech. Overall I thought that the speech was very good and I probably would have given him an A. With that being said no one is perfect therefore we cannot do everything perfect I believe there are some things that he could improve on. His introduction was awesome! He grabbed my attention with the story of mechanical arms over a woman on a surgery table as the lead in to his speech. He used the story and distinctly told us the topic of his speech followed by the three main points he would discuss. This gave us a preview that the body of the speech would discuss three specific robots and their functions in medical settings. He also proved that he was credible to give us this informative speech when he told us he was in the pre-med program at school. I thought the intro was just the right amount of …show more content…
We learned something during each point in the speech. He cited the sources and addressed them correctly. He included many interesting details and information about the robots but on the flip side I think in some parts he gave us an information overload that wasn’t necessarily pertinent to the topic. He went deeper than the headline information when he used the citations in his speech. He kept my interest by using stories about robot used in different clinical settings and examples of other ways these science fiction robots were becoming a science fact. I thought that the speech was organized in a good order and you could tell he spent a sufficient amount of time preparing his speech. The language he used was appropriate and he explained any abbreviations he used before he used them. He did however lack humor in the speech but his topic didn’t really call for humor so it was acceptable for this
of a Marine.’ Etc. & etc. At the time it seemed to me a very good speech,
Eidenmuller, Michael E. Great Speeches for Better Speaking: Listen and Learn From America’s Most Memorable Speeches. New York: Mcgraw Hill, 2008. Google Books. Web. 4 September 2010.
Overall, The speech was very well presented and had a decent balance of humor within it. There was a nice touch towards the end where he sincerely thanked people who had gotten him to where he is today. Whenever you receive an award it is always good to give credit where it is due as this can help you gain more respect from your audience. Speaking in to a group this large while on television is not something that everyone can do and I feel that Will Ferrell did a good job in demonstrating the message in which he wanted to get
The whole speech should be available if it is important enough to stand in the top fifty speeches in history. I feel like I could not grasp a hold of how the speaker was exactly expressing himself, making the presentation unbalanced. Macarthur said “I trust, therefore, that you will do me the justice of receiving that which I have to say as solely expressing the consideration viewpoint of a fellow American (Americanrhetoric.com).” He is not telling about an event that will change history or change the lives of anyone, he is just basically saying good-bye to Congress. The speaker made his point by ending his 52 years of military service but did not use specific
seemed to enjoy the speech. Homer Hickam mostly talked about his book Rocket Boys from
Overall, O’ Brien did a phenomenal job connecting with his audience. His speech had universal significance because his message was, failure and change will prevail, but you should embrace it and learn from it. This message is important cause failure and change universally affects everyone. O’Brien is giving the audience valuable advice by telling them to embrace their shortcomings and losses. Many people do not know what do when they fail. O’ Brien leads the viewers into comfort by telling them he has once failed before he was successful. O’Brien speech was very effective because of his use of humor and anecdotes, which helped convey his message with his audience.
...t orator and rhetor, his ability to integrate emotion into fact and still have facts exist as true and unbiased. As a result of the heavy factual details, his logos in this speech was excellent.
Upon reviewing my speech, I can understand where I need to improve my speaking skills, as well as places where I just need to fine-tune them. I chose to talk about skiing because it is an activity that I look forward to every winter, and knowing I had a trip out west over break I knew I would be able to talk about this topic easily. Although I do think that I gave an effective speech, I think there were many things to learn from the overall content, organization, and delivery of the speech. The content of my speech was an area that I think was adequate for an informative speech.
The speech didn’t feel scripted, he was comfortable and was credible with his information. His transitions went smoothly with his speech. To support his topic, he used statistics and even expert advice. He used examples, such as personal stories and friend’s stories. The detail in his explanations were put together very well and descriptive.
Paley gave the introduction part directly with a conversation. It introduced a man named Vicente that want to be a doctor. The story showed that he had a passion for that. He studied every bone and organ in the body, how it is for and how it works.
This is a good recap, as the thesis of the speech is about how they designed Airbnb for people to trust. Then he finishes it off by claiming that if you understand the value of trust you can design it to fit in with the essentials of forming Airbnb, which is a great summary-value, going over all the information he just covered in the conclusion statement. His exit goes over how if you can design things for humans to trust, what's to stop you at this point? His conclusion was thorough and understanding, better than any of the information he had spoken about above. It gives an understanding of exactly what he was trying to tell his audience and used a good recap and summary to state his claims in the body.
Fiskio herself was a good speaker -- she had a strong, conversational tone and used very intelligent language. She also had great articulation, pronunciation, pitch, volume, fluency, and projection. Although she paced slightly and used some hand gestures, they added to the presentation instead of detracting from it, and she kept good eye contact the entire time. Additionally, she was very confident, and she seemed poised and knowledgeable. She also used a lot of quotes and outside support, which gave her credibility and validity. Nonetheless, the presentation itself was lacking. The ideas seemed unorganized, and there was little to no explanation of their connections and relative importance to the average person. Despite its interesting beginning and ending, the body of the speech was confusing and not extremely engrossing. Even further, Fiskio’s PowerPoint was not very well done. The layout was passable, but it really only consisted of pictures slapped haphazardly on. The PowerPoint was not visually appealing and, though the pictures were good, it just seemed like it was lazily
Steve Jobs played a huge role in revolutionizing technology. He is considered to be a major role model for people and has heavily influenced many lives. I was able to witness some of the techniques he uses to inspire and push people in his speech. I consider the graduates, who were present on that day, lucky to be able to hear a few words of wisdom, inspiration and character from him.
He used the word “science” repeatedly to solidify his point: “Science must shape policy! Science is universal! Science brings out the best in us!” The crowd went wild as he exclaimed these statements. He used a hand-held microphone, but it was not a distraction or hindrance for him.