Brain Injury Controversy

591 Words2 Pages

When Zackery Lystedt was “returned to play” after sustaining a first concussion, and then sustained a second (second-impact syndrome,) he would never be the same again. After being airlifted to a major medical facility in Seattle, this athlete woke to his new life as a brain injured individual: he could not walk, he could not speak, he could swallow—the star athlete of his football team would not walk more than twenty-steps until he turned eighteen-years of age (Washingtonjustice, 2014). It was not until the Zackery Lystedt law, did this idea become “controversial.” Since its implementation in Washington State, fueled much by the NFL--every state in the United States has adopted this version of the law, completed in 2010 (Adler & Giersch, 2014). Furthermore, if there is a suspicion of Head Injury, parents and coaches cannot return them to play (BIAWA, 2015). In WA only licensed practitioners trained in Brain Injury have the authority to return this child to play because if they suffer a second head injury after the first, they could die (BIAWA, …show more content…

A concussion is a Brain Injury, it is not a bruise in the brain or bump, but a Brain Injury, which causes death of brain cells, decreased glucose needed for repair and nearly a fifty percent blood loss flow to the brain (BIAWA, 2015). As such, their ability to cognitively make decisions has now become impaired (McAvory, 2014). Furthermore, these side effects could be present three-weeks or longer, and will heal, if treated properly (McAvory, 2014). Doctor Stan Herring, Team Physician for The Seattle Seahawks and Mariners and personal physician of Zackery Lystedt, stated in his speech during the Washington Wenatchee Concussion Summit that you should never ask a child how they are feeling, in which they would most likely respond with, “Fine.” Instead, he encourages you to ask them “Yes” or “No”

Open Document