Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence on child development
Spanking and child abuse
How parents affect child development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Influence on child development
In this study, Boutwell used children born in 2001 to examine the first 5 years of their lives, gathering data in waves from 2001, 2003, and 2005. They tested 5450 males and 5250 females, to gather information about whether or not there is a correlation between how often the they’ve have been spanked in their childhood to behavioral issues including antisocial tendencies. The parents of the children in the study were given personal interviews and a self report questionare throughout these years to see how often they spank their children and any behavior and personality issues they may have as a result. They collected information regarding the childs motor skills, mental growth, speaking ability, and conduct. They researchers tested how impulsive …show more content…
They interviewed 585 families from Knoxville. Tennesee, Nashville, Tennesee, and Bloomington, Indiana. Children ages 5-16 were used in this sample.The researchers gathered data by conducting a 90 minute interview, having parents fill out a child behavior checklist, and videotaping the interaction the mother has with her child by having her engage in three tasks. The tasks consisted of: role-playing, problem-solving, and engaging in conversation. The researchers also accounted for parent-child relationships and ecological disadvantages such as parental stress or raising their child as a single parent. The mother and the adolescent were given questionaries to rate the levels of antisocial behaviors the child engages in. Ecological disadvantages and externalizing behaviors correlated with harsh physical discipline. Antisocial behavior and subsequent parent-child relationships were associated with mild physical disipline. They also found that physical discipline affects older children more negatively than younger …show more content…
This sample consisted of 4200 children from 20 U.S cites. The mother and fathers of 3 or 5 year olds were asked about how frequent they spanked their children. At ages 3 and 9 their parents were given an in-home interview asking about any rule-breaking, destructiveness, or agression the child exhibits. The children were given a test to determine their verbal capability and level of vocabulary. THe mothers answered questions about their childs level of control, their families characteristics, prenatal and maternal risks such as the mothers mental health and the influence of drugs or alcohol during the pregnancy. Both high and low frequency spanking at age 5 were a significant indication of behavioral problems at age 9. High frequency spanking was senonomous with low level vocabulary and cognitive learning scores. Overall, the results found show strong links to spanking and the childs agressive behavior and
Being physically aggressive by spanking your child leads them to be physically aggressive as well. According to the Pediatrics Journal, spanking 3-y...
Spanking is an important aspect of a child’s social development and should not be considered an evil form of abuse. In her argument, Debra Saunders says that there is an obvious difference between beating a child and spanking a child, and parents know the boundary. Spanking is the most effective form of discipline when a child knows doing something is wrong, but the child does it anyway. A child who is properly disciplined through spanking is being taught how to control her or his impulses and how to deal with all types of authorities in future environments. Parents can control their child’s future behavior by using spanking in early childhood, because if...
According to Park (2010) spanking has serious long term effects on a child.I agree with this argument drawn from conclusions in her article “The Long-Term Effects
Darcia Narvaez’s article “Research on Spanking: It’s Bad for ALL Kids” argues the negative effects of spanking any child. She brings light to a long standing form of parenting that has recently been proven more detrimental than beneficial. She argues that spanking any child is not only ineffective in deterring undesirable behaviors, but also damaging to any child. She argues, that spanking can cause an increase aggression in children among other undesirable behaviors. She states that spanking not only has lasting damages with the parent-child relationship, but can also lead to an increase in undesirable behaviors. Darcia Narvaez’s arguments presented are does not rely heavily on pathos, and instead uses logos.
Holden (2002) reviewed Gershoff’s (2002) meta-analyses of eighty-eight (88) studies and noted that there were both positive and negative outcomes associated with the punishment of spanking. According to Gershoff’s (2002) analysis, the one positive outcome was immediate compliance by the child (Holden, 2002). This result was found to be consistent in five (5) studies. Immediate compliance was defined as the child complying to the parents directive within five (5) seconds. In stark contrast, there were four (4) negative outcomes. The analysis showed a negative effect on the quality of the parent child relationship, the child’s mental health, the child’s perception of being a victim of physical child abuse, and also impacted aggression in adulthood (Holden, 2002).
In the first study that examined the effects of spanking on child aggression, researchers wanted to look at whether or not there was an association between the use of corporal punishment on children at age 3 and the aggression of the child that could potentially follow when the child reached the age of 5. They also wanted to look at any other potential risk factors that could contribute to the mother’s use of corporal punishment on the child.
Elrod and Ryder (2011) state that child physical abuse is rather more specific than any other kind of “discipline”. There is a difference between spanking and child physical abuse, and that child physical abuse is more of a degree, not kind. There is no specific estimate of the exact role that child abuse and neglect plays in the United States, however, it is certain that there is a significant social problem in this area. Elrod and Ryder (2011) state that even mild forms of violence against children may encourage aggression and that physical abuse is strongly related to a variety of childhood adjustment problems. One of the major areas of childhood adjustment problems lies within the area of violent juvenile crime. Child physical abuse, aside from having physical injuries, affects the mental state of a c...
Spanking a child is a controversial issue. On one side of the debate are people who believe spanking is a necessary component of parenting. On the contrary are people who think spanking a child is destructive. Somewhere in the middle are people who believe spanking is legitimate only when used correctly. Part of the reason for the debate is that some parents and experts define spanking differently. To some, spanking means slapping a child on the rear-end, while others believe it is a form of corporal punishment that does not cause injury. By showing how each perspective of spanking supports their claim and defining spanking, one will be able to form an opinion.
In a research project done using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, researchers examined the antecedents of parents’ spanking behavior. This study represents an important step forward in understanding the profile of parents who spank their children.
Spanking teaches the child that violence is a socially accepted behavior to attain a desired result. To better understand this concept, we must first look at how a child’s brain works. From infancy, children learn through observation and imitation. Studies have shown that infants as young as forty-two minutes can successfully replicate simple facial expressions (Metzloff, Decety 492). By eight months, infants can imitate basic motor movement, even after twenty-four hours have passed since the initial movement occurred. At fourteen months, children can apply an imitation to an external situation up to a week after the initial imitation. (Windell, 67-68, 221). A famous example of this is Albert Bandura’s Bobo doll experiment. Christopher Green of York University helps interpret Bandura’s experiment and results: While acknowledging that certain children may have inherited aggressive personalities, Bandura demonstrated that the majority of personality is learned. Adult models were escorted to a room and shown various toys to play with while child observers watched from outside the room. Among the various toys was a clown “bobo” doll. In some “play” sessions, the models demonstrated aggression toward the doll by punching, kicking, hitting and yelling at it. In other sessions, the models quietly pla...
On the CNN website, Ruben Navarrette wrote an article titled “Spanking Isn’t Child Abuse; It’s Common Sense” on the topic of how to educate children. The piece is targeted at parents who have little idea of what they should do to discipline their children. He stated that he is against child abuse, but he supports corporal punishment as a form of education. Ruben questioned the methods of “modern parents” by comparing their ways with the previous generation of parents.
Swat! The entire store tries not to stare at the overwhelmed mother spanking her three-year-old whaling son. As if the screaming tantrum wasn't enough of a side show at the supermarket. This method, or technique perhaps, has been around for decades, even centuries. Generations have sat on grandpa’s lap and listened to the stories of picking their own switch or getting the belt after pulling off a devilish trick. So why then has it become a major controversy in the past few decades? The newest claim is that spanking and other forms of physical punishment can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury and mental health problems for children. Brendan L. Smith uses many case studies and psychologists findings in his article “The Case Against Spanking” to suggest that parents refrain from physically punishing their children due to lasting harmful effects.
Violence within families often reflects behaviours learned by children from their parents. A theory is that violent behaviour is passed down from generation to generation through families (Cole & Flanagin, Pg. 2). The majority of Americans are subjected to corporal punishment at one point or another during their lifetime(Kandel, Pg. 4). Surveys suggested that almost all American parents used physical punishment at one point or another and the punishment was regared as an appropriate child rearing technique. Another survey also suggested that some psychologists belive physical punishment to be an effective and useful socialization tool(Kandel, Pg. 2). Aggression is commonly conceived as existing on a continuum, ranging from very severe parental aggression to much milder and normal parental aggression, such as use of corporal or physical punishment(Kandel, Pg. 1). A common concern is that parental use of physical punishment will lead to aggressive behaviour in children.
When I was a child, I could not remember a time when my parents spanked me. I asked my mom how she and my dad disciplined my three brothers and I, and she said she never spanked us. When we got into trouble we were sent to our room, and had privileges taken away. My mom also said that she can remember spanking my younger brother once, but left a bruise on his bottom, and she felt so bad that she never did it again.
Many parents find themselves using frequent sayings such as, “do not touch that”, do not do that”, and “stop being mean to your sister!” Along with those sayings, parents still refer to a specific passage from the Bible, Proverbs 22:15, which states: Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him. The chapters 22 and 23 of Proverbs speak of how the rod should be used and when. It also tells parents spanking the child will not kill him. Many researchers and parents would argue these facts and state is does cause harm but if they could understand the limitations of the teachings, incorporate communication, and set boundaries the use of a rod would instill wisdom, instruction, and understanding in a child.