Border War: The Battle Over Illegal Immigration

907 Words2 Pages

"Border War: The Battle Over Illegal Immigration" is a documentary that explores the complex and contentious issue of illegal immigration in the United States. Through the stories of the individuals directly affected by immigration, the film constructs a narrative emphasizing the perceived threats and impacts of illegal immigration. This essay examines how "Border War" produces this hegemonic narrative using various narrative techniques. By employing a post-structural approach, this analysis will draw on the theoretical frameworks of Kimberle Crenshaw's intersectionality, Dorothy Allison's exploration of class and identity, and Weedon's principles of poststructuralism. I will explore how the film's narrative techniques contribute to a simplified …show more content…

For instance, J.D. Hayworth, a Republican congressman from Arizona, states, "More illegal immigrants enter the United States through Arizona than Texas, New Mexico, and California combined" (BW). This statement generalizes the threat of illegal immigration, suggesting that Arizona's experience is representative of the entire United States. By focusing on the experiences of predominantly non-white immigrants, the film uses raced discourses to imply that illegal immigration is primarily a problem caused by specific racial groups. Kimberle Crenshaw's concept of intersectionality highlights the limitations of such an approach. Crenshaw argues that focusing on specific stories often overlooks the unique and intersecting identities and experiences of individuals …show more content…

Lupe Moreno, a Hispanic woman, and leader of the Minuteman Project, asserts, "Our Legislature said we have no money to give veterans and education no money. There is no money for that. But then the next bill was to give illegal aliens in-state tuition. And what did they do? We have money for that" (BW). This statement sets up a clear binary between "deserving citizens" and "illegal immigrants," implying that immigrants inherently cause disorder. The film often portrays women in traditional, passive roles or as victims needing protection, which reinforces gendered discourses about women's roles in society. Kimberle Crenshaw’s critique of binary thinking in identity politics reveals the limitations of such dichotomies. Crenshaw argues that these simplistic oppositions fail to capture the complex and intersecting identities of marginalized individuals. She writes, "The problem with identity politics is not that it fails to transcend difference... but rather the opposite—that it frequently conflates or ignores intragroup differences" (Crenshaw, p. 1242). By presenting immigrants as a homogeneous group that threatens societal order, the film overlooks the diverse and nuanced experiences

Open Document