Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Integration between science and religion
The influence of religion on science
Integration between science and religion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Integration between science and religion
Entwistle Book Review
Alesia M Shaw
Liberty University
Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity” tells about the integrating Christianity and Psychology. According to author Entwistle (2010) he discusses integration and how they are combined. The book of God’s word is referred to the Bible and the book of Psychology is the work that reflects his deeds that is written throughout God’s work. In the text it included five different models of integration which are: enemies, spies, colonialists, neutral parties and allies as subjects of one (p. 154). The enemies model take the position on the psychology of human beings verses the theology of human beings, so therefore this model sees Christians and psychology as enemies that should be kept separate from one another. The spies model, unlike the enemies model does not reject religion, but does take only what works for them. Psychology would enter the Christian world and take parts of the religion concepts that they feel would work well them. Just as a person would take part of the bible and read what they believe only applies to them. The colonialist model has a superficial acquaintance with psychological theories, they the colonist does not exert signification effort towards understanding how psychology and Christianity both express truth or how they can both gain a larger picture of how human nature is functioned (p.137-145).From my understanding Entwistle (2010) believes that psychology works well with religion as long as religion obeys or is superior to psychology.
Neutral parties’ model states that as long as they both respect each other’s boundaries there should be some level of respect. It allows psychological theories and finding to exist on their own ...
... middle of paper ...
... correctly. Thirdly is to further my education in Christian counseling and to use what God has installed in me. I believe when you apply your faith into Christianity and psychology it will be beneficial to you as well as your client by allowing the Holy Spirit to use you and guide you while you counsel. It’s also important to know that both Christianity and psychology is a part of Gods truth to help others as well as ourselves. We are all put on this earth to serve and minister to those who need to be ministered too. When the two books are integrated, we must know that we must not use them separately because they both complement each other and they can help reach those people who are believers as well as those who are unbelievers.
Reference
Entwistle, D.N. (2010). Integrative Approaches to psychology and Christianity (2nd ed).
Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock
In the first chapter of Psychology in Christian Perspective by Harold W. Faw the author talks about psychology as a subject, the different aspects of the subject and how psychology fits into the Christian world. Faw begins the chapter by describing what others think psychology and his views on psychology as well. He describes that “psychology can be described as a systematic attempt to understand human behavior and conscious experience” (Faw, 1995, p. 12). He then goes on to describe the many different types of specialties of psychology which include, neurobiological, behavioral, cognitive, humanistic, and psychoanalytic. These specialties are then integrated into the Christian worldview. They are all different so they all fit into
As a Christian counselor, we have the power of the Word on our sides, but so many of us do not understand how to properly apply scripture into the counseling relationship in an effective manner. In Interventions that Apply Scripture in Psychotherapy, Garzon (2005) attempts to accomplish the following; educate individuals on the various techniques one can use to apply scripture, and to encourage and stimulate God ordained creativity in the hopes to create new techniques and methods for applying God’s Word in the counseling relationship.
People then view this as psychology and Christianity as being incompatible (Entwistle, 2015). But Entwistle states for the reader “Integration involves identifying key Christian commitments that shape how we understand human beings, and it requires a firm grasp of the theories, methods and findings of psychology” (Entwistle, 2015, p. 15). This statement proposes that throughout history both theologians and scientists have examined ways to better understand human beings, but never fully looked to see why science and theology could never be integrated. Looking at the term integration would suggest that both scientists and theologians would have to make an effort to build the connections between psychology and theology but over the years they have always been dis-integrated. For the reader Entwistle points out that integration can be both a noun and a verb and that while people may disagree with the outcome that integration may be possible, Entwistle (2015) states that if both sides were to look at the historical relationship between psychology and Christianity in a broader spectrum and by seeking the philosophical underpinnings for finding knowledge and truth both sides could see that there are correlations between science and faith (Entwistle,
Entwistle, D. N. (2010). Integrative approaches to psychology and Christianity (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.
The integration of psychology and Christianity is a rarely touched subject that Entwistle opened the door wide open with this complex and informative book. Entwistle uses is own worldview and research to supply the information for this book with a spiritual twist. Entwistle did accomplish to gather concise information and while also remaining objective. I do think that in the information that was provided I took it as him putting psychology and Christianity on the same pedestal. God is the creator and the maker of all and there is no equal or greater than him. I do feel like integrating psychology and Christianity can open the minds of individuals and show them another way to look at individual
Entwistle explains that our worldview greatly impacts how our Christian and psychology worldviews. God created us all differently; some of us grew up in small towns, large families, different countries, large cities. We all come from different homes lives, have different family units and the list goes on. Because we are all created differently our opinions and reactions are all different, making our worldviews all unique. Entwistle believes that our worldview is not something chosen for us or something we choose. He believes that it is created by our life experiences. He begins by introducing 5 models that involve integration. These models are enemies, spies, colonialist, neutral parties and allies. He states that the models “represent different ways of conceptualizing the relationship between psychology and religion in general or psychology and Christianity, in particular.” (p. 136) Those that follow the enemy model take an “either/or” (p.137) position. They agree that both topics should be separated at all times. There is no in between on the two. With the...
A framework of five models is shared: Enemies, Spies, Colonialists, Neutral Parties, and Allies. The Enemies model either associates no relationship between Christianity and psychology. The Spies model focuses on what works best for them from both Christianity and psychology. Colonialists use psychology only to the degree that it fits theology. Neutral Parties model holds that psychology and theology are independent with possible correlation between findings of the two, however that is about as far as one discipline may encroach on the other. Allies, the model considered by Entwistle, acknowledges that while psychology and theology are separate, they are still dependent, based upon the underlying unity of truth of God’s written word and His Works (Entwistle, 2010). The underpinning of the integrative approach to psychology and Christianity appears to be that of anthropology; this may be seen in the two books, God g...
One focal point in this book is to discuss “integrative approaches in a well-conceived Christian world view” (p.63), with concentration on the history of psychology, the relationship of faith and science, and controversial matters in science and psychology. He states “in many ways the foundations of science were paved in part by a Christian world view that allowed for the universe to be seen as an orderly place in which laws could describe the regularities found within it, based on the premise that the world was created by a powerful, rational, and personal Being” (p. 33). The book introduces the assorted integration models, the five paradigms, or ways of relating psychology to Christianity. The first one being enemy paradigm, meaning psychology and Christianity cannot be integrated in any way, “the belief that ps...
Throughout reading Caring for People God Way, Chapter 1, I began to ponder the question why do people chose to come to Christin counseling? If a person thinks about it, just because a person wants to attend Christian counseling does not mean, they are Christian person or they believe in Christ. A person may have to console and induvial who has problem does not go to church. According to Clinton, Hart and Ohlschlager (2005), “they believe that Christ is facilitated by a helper who assist this redemption process, helping another get unstuck and moving forward on the path too spiritual maturity and psycho-social-emotional health” (p.16). Christian counseling allows the person to confront their internal conflict. People attend Christian counseling because they feel
Integration: The Allies Model The integration of psychology and Christianity is a very complicated subject that has sprung a heated debate over how best to integrate the two disciplines. Integration is a simple subject with many different definitions. However, according to Entwistle (2015), “The integration of psychology and Christianity is a multifaceted attempt to discern the underlying truths about the nature and functioning of human beings from the unique vantage points of psychology (in its various sub-disciplines, utilizing diverse methodologies) and Christianity (in theology, faith, and practice)” (p. 260).
Throughout the Bible many facts, lessons, and teachings are mentioned, but one thing which is not directly mentioned is psychology. However, just because this subject is not specifically mentioned does not mean that it is not in the Bible. For instance, one way that these two often correlate is in the area of emotion. Another, area is traits and actions that match up in both of these. But, it should also be noted that not all areas of psychology and the Bible match. In the end hopefully each of these points will help show just how these two subjects can be connected, even if it may not always appear so at first glance.
occasion, relationship with the opposite party or the nature of conflict (Nankervis et al 2011, p 512).
Johnson, Eric L. (2007). Christ, The Lord of Psychology. In Daryl H. Stevenson, Brian E. Eck & Peter C. Hill (Eds.). Psychology Christianity Integration: Seminole Works that Shaped the Movement (pp. 42-57). Batavia, IL: Christian Association for Psychological Studies, Inc.
the theories, and the techniques dealing with Christian and secular counseling will require different tactics and approaches for it to be effective
Party number one wanted nothing to change; I didn’t want any help from anybody, and I was willing to go to outer space and back to make sure I did not lose anything that I already had. On the other hand my family and friends were deeply concerned about my well-being, and were willing to go to all measures to change my life style even if it meant bending the truth. These conflict goals can be analyzed through many conflict models and theories. The Lens Model of Conflict represents the building blocks of a conflict. We can easily compare my interpersonal conflict with this model. The model consists of the two aspects of a conflict, communication behaviors, and the perception of those behaviors. The communication behaviors that existed within my interpersonal conflict were obviously different between both parties. I felt like my friends went behind my back talking to my parents so when I spoke to them it wasn’t on best terms along with my parents. On the other side of things my family and friends were very supportive and only wanted the best for me. They were very clear with their emotions, even though they knew that I hated what they were saying and hated that they were trying to change me, they still had my best interest in mind. The second aspect of the Lens Model of Conflict is the