Book Banning Rhetorical Analysis

Book banning has been considered an issue for many years, more than in the past century. Schools are majorly involved with book banning and restricting sections in their libraries. Garret Keizer wrote an opinion essay covering the topic in his view. His main point is that many influential books have been banned for misguided reasons. Keizer writes, “...the one piece of common ground” he has with book banners is they “both believe that books matter, that they have the power to change a young person’s life” (Keizer). Book banners and the people against the bans agree that books matter and are impactful for present and future generations. He wants to give the audience meaningful reasons why the presence of books in our world is important. His

Books have the same common purposes, which are to persuade, inform, and entertain, which can be determined by the author’s purpose to see the different ways a book can be important. The majority of the essay itself can be seen as entirely too opinionated or passionate, but both views are plausible. On this subject, there are many different points of view that Keizer considers in his comparison of himself and the book banners. Keizer’s main goal is for books to impact others as they did him. He expands on the issue in his essay by bringing the misguided reasons for book-banning to the surface. The essay was created by Garret Keizer to show the parallel structure that connects himself and the book banners while pointing out faulty reasoning behind the book-banning process. Throughout the text, the issue of book banning is clear. Keizer states, “Like it or not, we belong to the same minority, the minority of those who believe in the power of literature in a post-literate age” (Keizer). He believes that the book banners and the people against the bans share a likeness to the importance of books that can influence so many people’s