Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
World war 2 us involvement
World war 2 us involvement
World war 2 us involvement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: World war 2 us involvement
Bombing of Hiroshima
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Introduction
A short summary of the movie
The movie on bombing of Hiroshima features the events that took place way back on 6th August, 1945; in which the Japanese cities; Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bomb attacked by the United States. The attack was a plan engineered by the then president of the United States Harry Truman who had succeeded President Frankline Roosevelt as a result of his untimely demise. This was towards the end of the World War II that involved the German troops against the Soviet powers. Since the U.S. was a great ally of the Russian territory and the great enemy of Germany, it decided to move in swiftly to aid its historical ally; Russia. Since
…show more content…
the only vibrant war at that time was the bloody battle for Pkinawa in the Pacific, orchestrated by the Japanese army, the United States decided to begin by attacking the strongholds of German; Japan. The American casualties were quickly increasing even if the Japanese casualties and fatalities were also equally high. This was against the expectation of the then U.S. secretary of state James Byrnes, who pronounced that the use of the bomb would end the war in one blow. The idea was quickly bought by the president though against the petition of about 73 scientists including Leo Scilard the nuclear physicist. Since the Japanese under Gen. Anami Korechika refuted claims of contemplating surrender, the situation prompted the U.S. to adopt the mechanism of dropping the bomb at Hiroshima killing close to 100, 000 people and injuring 100, 000 others out of the population of 250, 000 of the town’s inhabitants. This nonetheless marked the end of the World War II. My opinion of the movie My opinion is that the decision to drop the bomb by the United States was not a wise one considering the far reaching effects that bombing had on the inhabitants of Hiroshima and their subsequent generations.
First the bomb caused innumerable fatalities of innocent people which could have been avoided. Just before the ill-fated bombing scene, the Japanese were seen training and even the children participated in combat using the bamboo sticks. In my opinion, the United States could have contemplated changing the plan because the step taken by the Japanese portrayed desperation and patriotism to their beloved country that is why they opted to incorporate the children in the battle. The worst thing is how the innocent people lost their lives yet the war was not at all about them but rather about the Germans and the soviet powers.
Was the United States justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima?
The United States of America was not in any way justified in dropping the bomb. In the first place, the decision of using the bomb was a demonstration of the incumbent president to proof to the citizens his toughness having garnered massive vote in the general elections. This could not be a sufficient reason why the atomic bomb could necessarily be used in this war. Secondly, the war was only between Germany and Russia. Perhaps the United States could have only intervened friendly by brokering arbitrary mission to bring peace between the warring parties but not to take such a step.
Was Hiroshima truly a military target or did the United States drop the bomb on the city for other
reasons? The initial plan was to drop the bomb on Kyoto but the U.S, changed mind in the last minute to drop the bomb at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This was after a series of intervention attempts to coerce the president to contemplate the extent of destruction that would ensue after bombing. Ostensibly, this was like a trial to gauge what the nuclear bombing could do when unleashed. Similarly, the reason for bombing Hiroshima could be attributed to the proximity of the town to the Pkinawa region where the battle was basically escalated. Since the war, there has been talk that the decision to drop the bomb was a “crime against humanity.” What is your opinion of this? Should the United States government have been charged with war crimes? Should the crew of the “Enola Gay” have been charged with war crimes? Explain. I feel that the United States government should be sued for the crime against humanities in the International Criminal Court following the atrocities that were caused to the innocent lives. The worst thing is seeing the subsequent generations succumbing to the incessant effects of the bombing. It is hitherto witnessed that many people have sustained abnormalities whose causes are attributed to the bombing that took place 70 years ago. Therefore, I highly recommend that the crew that operated Enola Gay should have been charged with crimes against humanity because the atrocities that they caused to the people of Hiroshima are even worse than some of the atrocities that convicts of the present day crimes against humanity have been charged with.
Truman was justified in dropping the Atomic bombs because of the situation at hand, but it is arguable because he had several alternatives. Right after America declared war on Japan, Germany also declared war on the United States. Thereby, causing a dilemma for the United States nation as a whole. If the US didn't finish the war with Japan quickly, they would have trouble backing up the allied powers. However, Truman could have found another way to defeat Japan with a less violent tactic.
Should We Have Dropped the Atomic Bomb? The atomic bomb killed many innocent people, but it was necessary to end World War II. After World War II began in 1939, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt announced the neutrality of the United States. Many people in the United States think that their country should stay out of the war. The people wanted the Allied Forces to have the victory.
The use of the atomic bomb against Japan was completely justified in both cause and impact. An intense weapon was necessary to force a quick Japanese surrender. The bomb saved thousands upon thousands of American and Japanese lives that would have been lost if the war continued or an invasion occurred. The bomb was the only way to end the suffering of the millions who were being held captive by the Japanese oppressor. The weapon of mass destruction also sent a powerful message to the shaky Soviet allies. The choice to use the atomic bomb was justified because it compelled a Japanese surrender, saved countless lives, served as retribution for the sufferings of many people, and acted as an anti-Soviet deterrent.
In my opinion, the decision to use the atomic bomb was harsh and rash, but necessary to end the war and protect American lives and interests. Sometimes harsh decisions need to be made in order to serve the greater good. It was somewhat unjust to the Japanese civilians but in the end saved many military lives that would have been wasted if the war dragged on for who knows how many more years. This is why, in the end, I feel it was the best way to put the storm of World War 2 to rest.
A huge proponent to the use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9 of 1945 was President Harry Truman. Although they value the ideas and contributions out in by the committee they choose, the president ultimately has the last say on war time decisions. It just so happens that President Truman wanted to drop the bomb. President Truman believed that Japan's leaders would not surrender to the terms outlined in Potsdam meeting. He saw it fit to drop the bombs and end all doubt.
On August 6, 1945, the U.S. dropped the world’s first atomic bomb over Hiroshima. Three days later, a second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki. On August 15th, the Japan announced unconditional surrender in World War II. To this day historians still discuss why the U.S. decided to use the atomic bombs. Orthodox historians argue that the decision to drop the bombs was a military one designed purely to defeat the Japanese. Revisionist historians argue that the bombs were not needed to defeat Japan; the bombs were meant to shape the peace by intimidating the Soviets. After analyzing the documents in The Manhattan Project it has become clear that the U.S. used the bombs during WWII not only to defeat the Japanese, but also to intimidate the Soviet Union
Hiroshima was a significant military city during the war. It confined two army headquarters and was Japan’s communication center (World War 2 Atomic Bomb 1). Hiroshima was also a huge industrial city and had not been bombed before so it would let Japan see the wrath of the United States (Koeller 1). The planning and actual event of the bombing went great. On August 6, 1945 at 8:15 in the morning the bomb was dropped.
On December 7, 1941, Pearl Harbor was bombed by the Japanese. The brutal battles of Okinawa, Iwo Jima, and Midway proved that the Japanese were powerful soldiers and fearsome. The Kamikaze pilots were part of the Japanese army and lived with the Bushido code. The Bushido code was that a warrior must be loyal courageous, and etc. for the emperor. Emperor Hirohito was the emperor of Japan at the time and all soldier must be loyal and fight for the emperor to follow the Bushido code. Since the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, President Truman ordered the atomic bomb Fatman and Little Boy to be dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki of Japan. President Truman’s order of bombing Japan was unjustified because there were alternative ways of solving the
The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan were ethical decisions made by President Harry Truman and the United States government. By the time of the atom bomb was ready, the U.S. had been engaged in military conflict for over four years and lost over 400,000 soldiers. Truman claimed, "We would have the opportunity to bring the world into a pattern in which the peace of the world and our civilization can be saved" (Winkler 18). The bomb was aimed at ending the war immediately and avoiding prolonged battle in the Pacific Theater and the inevitable invasion of Japan. President Truman hoped that by showing the Japanese the devastating weapon the U.S. possessed, that the war could be brought ...
In 1945, Germany had surrendered, but the war in the Pacific raged on. The allies were becoming desperate to end the war before it was necessary to carry out a full scale invasion. New developments in science had made it possible for the United States to weaponize the atom, and the consequent bomb created was dropped on Hiroshima and later Nagasaki at the approval of President Harry S. Truman and his advisors. In years to come, Truman would have to face questions over the merit of his actions. Although some may believe the atomic bomb was needed because it ended WWII, it was unnecessary to drop the nuclear bomb because of the alternatives that existed, the effect it had on the Japanese people, and because of the unethical reasons for dropping it.
“My God, what have we done?” were the words that the co-pilot of Enola Gay wrote in his logbook after helping drop two bombs, one in Hiroshima and one in Nagasaki, that killed an estimated two-hundred thousand individuals. The bombings were completely unnecessary. Japan was already defeated because they lacked the necessary materials to continue a world war. The Japanese were prepared to surrender. There was no military necessity to drop the atomic bombs nor is there any factual information stating that the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were dropped to “save the lives of one million American soldiers.” The United States bombed Japan in August of 1945. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were uncalled for and could have been avoided.
On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped the first atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This was an extremely controversial military strategy in the United States. Was the United States justified in the dropping of the atomic bomb? The U.S. feared the rise of communism and gave aid to any country against it. The U.S. also fought countries threatening the spread communism. One of these countries was Japan. We began a harsh and brutal war against Japan and against communism. This war was killing many soldiers and Japan was not backing down. President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb when things were getting worse. The decision to use the atomic bomb was a difficult one and many people wonder if it was the right choice.
In his essay "Hiroshima," John Berger examines the bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. As he flips through the pages of the book Unforgettable Fire, he begins to relay his own views on the dropping of the A-bomb. Berger suggests his belief that it was an act of terrorism on the Japanese.
The United States was justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki for many reasons. First of all, just to start out, the bombings had nothing to do with Japan, it was about the Cold War and the real reason America used these weapons was to show Russia that the US possessed them. Second, the war in the Pacific had been raging for almost four years. The two battles immediately preceding the bomb decision were Iwo Jima and Okinawa, two battles where the Japanese fought to the death and the cost in American casualties was horrific. It was predicted that the invasion of the Japanese mainland at the Island of Kyushu -- scheduled for November of 1945 -- would be even worse. The entire Japanese military and civilian population would fight to the death. American casualties -- just for that initial invasion to get a foothold on the island of Japan would have taken up to an estimated two months and would have resulted in up to 75,000 to 100,000 casualties. And that was just the beginning. Once the island of Kyushu was captured by U.S. troops, the remainder of Japan would follow. You can just imagine the cost in injuries and lives this would take. Also It is not beyond the possibility that a million or more Americans could have been killed had we landed. The Japanese had correctly guessed where we intended to land, and were ready and waiting for us. The casualties would have been high. Another reason the atomic bomb was justified is the bomb was dropped with a desire to save lives. It is a matter of math. How many Americans lost their lives fighting how many Japanese at Tarawa, Iwo Jima, Okinawa. The mathematical formula showed the closer we got to Japan the more we lost.
The long lasting effects of the atomic bomb dropped on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified by the United States. The United States had no other choice, or the war would just go on, which would be unfavorable for both the United States and Japan.