More handpicked essays just for you.
Body cameras on police officers essay
Body cameras on police officers essay
Body cameras on police officers essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recently there have been many controversies and talks about body cameras going on police officers uniforms to help stop crimes. Birmingham, AL has given their police officers 319 body cameras this July, causing the use of force to drop 30 percent and complaints from public by 70 percent. Here we can tell, that body cameras can give justice and fairness to the public by stating how high percentages raise for safety. Their procedures and policies change for the officers that take their duty as a joke and misuse their power and position. Policies tends to change, because the police officers will have to control their temper and despite how rude a civilian is behaving they will have to give full cooperation and kindness. They will not be …show more content…
able to lose their temper and begin to hit them with a baton or shoot them. The police officers are required to carry the body camera when they are on line of duty. This controversy heated up from the Michael Brown vs. Ferguson case in late August, 2014. Due to the violent shooting that the police had caused on that man made a huge riot causing destruction in Ferguson. The public believed that if that police had a body camera then he might not have misused his power. Despite how difficult a person may be but if the officers are aware someone is watching them they will work harder and help the public a lot more. Obama’s opinion on body camera is, "There's been a lot of talk about body cameras as a silver bullet or a solution. I think the task force concluded that there is a role for technology to play in building additional trust and accountability, but it's not a panacea. It has to be embedded in a broader change in culture and a legal framework that ensures that people's privacy is respected and that not only police officers but the community themselves feel comfortable with how technologies are being used." I agree to what he says, it is a good thing to give officers to wear body cameras however that would be taking up their privacy. The public safety is a concern for the president as well but he is trying to see and help both the majority. Another incident which occurred in changing our policies of how our law enforcement worked and the procedures that were dealt were with the Trayvon Martin v. Zimmerman case. Because of that case now officers are required that the police must make an announcement as soon as possible acknowledging an incident occurred, that an investigation is ongoing. Which is very secure and useful to the public, ensuring safety of not only the police but the people as well. Zimmerman shouldn't have shot Trayvon, he was supposed to listen to what the cop was telling him, now for future safety the cops will be required to keep everyone posted on when investigations are occurring or a chase is being done. James P. Gaffney, believes that what had happened was wrong but now we can fix and make tomorrow better. In a sentence he claimed, “Police agencies must address the black community’s lack of faith in law enforcement.” Perhaps the incidents that occurred we can't change it but it can help better our society and minds. Everyone has their opinions on saying maybe if the police did this or if the victim reacted a certain other way then death could have been averted.
I believe so, like many other people do that yes things could have been shaped differently today. I recommend on saying perhap if Trayvon Martin did not start to run then Zimmerman would not have ran and wrestled and then shot him. The other side of it could also be Zimmerman could have stopped him and asked him nicely what he was doing, why he was out so late. And if Trayvon did not behave appropriately then Zimmerman could have called the cops to come and take him to the police station and from there his parents would come and take him home. Despite how bad a circumstance can be or a person may be but no one should lose their life. God gave us a life, no human has the power to take it away from us. Martin Brown case is the same as Trayvon Martin. However, they should have conducted a psychological test on the cop to see his mental ability. Or perhaps allowing body cameras to be released earlier than that crime could have been avoided However, I honestly believe that if a person has a heart than he will care for others but if he has a mind, he will destroy the ones he loves and himself. If he would have controlled his anger then he wouldn't he be in jail right now, his family would not be going through humiliations. We can only change the minds that tries to see others but the minds of racists will never change until we raise a voice and show them our
power. In summary to everything, every individual has the right to justice, they do not need to be telecasted on media for people to raise their voice. If instead of those two cases reaching the media the people who heard Trayvon’s plead for help came forth and helped him things would have been different. If in Michael Brown’s case the police officer had some intelligence then he would not have done what he did. So much if’s, but very little changes, body cameras are getting more distributed in America. Hopefully, these body cameras will help ensure our safety and to prevent teen deaths, domestic violence from police, rape and murders as well. Also while conducting research the police has to state everything someone says so they are aware of what is happening. These cases have helped better our government and also the society. The men who lost their lives gave us a lesson, to not do what they did, to instead defend in a way which preserves their life and those near them, lets allow and make their life sacrificed, valuable.
On the night of February 26, 2012 “George Zimmerman who was the coordinator for his Sanford neighborhood watch association is charged with second-degree murder in the death of a young boy. Trayvon Martin, an unarmed high school student from Miami, Florida. (Alvarez) The case began in a small city of Sanford as a routine homicide but soon evolved into a civil rights case, examining racial profiling. On the night of the attack Zimmerman was told not to get out of his car when he was following Trayvon. He described Trayvon as a “guy who looks up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something” Trayvon had his back to Zimmerman the whole time he was on the phone with the Dispatcher, from what the conversation was saying. When the dispatcher asked Zimmerman “is the guy white, black, or Hispanic? “Zimmerman says that he “looks” black, Zimmerman still has yet to see if Trayvon was black, white, or even Hispanic because Trayvon was walking the other direction. Later on in the conversation is when Zimmerman said “now he’s just staring at me”. That would have been the right time to mention the race of Trayvon. As the dispatcher was asking mo...
... Till, Evers, King and Martin all seem to be cases of stereotyping and racial profiling. These cases make it seem as if justice was not served and that the wrong verdict was rendered initially. That is the same situation with the Zimmerman vs. Martin case. . Hopefully justice will prevail, in time, just as in the cases cited and George Zimmerman will be placed behind bars for a long time; the place where he belongs. If history repeats itself, a wrong verdict will be overturned.
Young Trayvon Martin was killed because of racial profiling. Due to the way he was dressed, in all black with a hoodie, he was seen as a threat. Trayvon had no intentions to hurt anyone, he carried no weapon, but just because the way he looked he was murdered. Racial profiling is wrong in many ways. The history of racial profiling and the psychology proves that racial profiling is nothing but an excuse for blatant racism. Humans are not put on this earth to be wrongly accused simply by the way that they look. How a person lives or dies should not be based on racial profiling which is an immoral and unethical tactic.
The Zimmerman case allowed me to be aware of something that was right in front of me. At a young age, my mother's significant other was arrested and imprisoned for "trafficking drugs". My mother had always maintained that he was initially arrested due to racial profiling, as there was no sufficient evidence to warrant the police to search his car. Despite this information being told to me as a child, I remained blind to the effects that such a system of injustice could have on your economic status, mental health, etc. However, I believe that the outcome of the Zimmerman trial opened my eyes to this effect. I believe that Trayvon Martin's family most likely received the same financial and emotional stresses due to the racial injustice associated with their experience. However, they had lost their son. Following the shooting of Trayvon Martin, I began to understand the effect that systemic racism could have on the lives of Black people, and how it had already been affecting
Based on my research I went from all for officers being forced to wear body cameras to being indecisive on which side is right. On the up side of officers wearing body camera, it could be a way the people can regain trust in the system, something that has decline over the years. The down side to that is that people right to privacy and figuring out the perfect way for the pubic to see what’s going on without seeing who is really involved. Another pro is that police officers will probably think before they react and being sure they are following all rules and regulation to ensure they are doing the job the way it’s supposed to be done. Then there is the issue with how to fund this project with the right man power and the money to be sure it’s done right. So, doing this assignment has open my eye to the pros and cons of forcing officer to wear body cameras and made me think about both sides with an unbiased
Police officers with their body cameras: a history and back ground paper to answer the question if should all police officers wear body cameras, it is important to first look at the history and back ground of the topic. According to article of Journal of quantitative criminology, writers Ariel, Farrar, Sutherland, Body cameras have been given a new eye opener to people about the excessive use of force against their community members. Arial, Farrar, and Sutherland in the article state “The effect of police body warn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomize controlled trial” describe their observation as:
Police Body Cameras Due to devastating events that have occurred between policemen and civilians, law enforcements find it liable for police officers to be fitted with body cameras. In doing so it is thought to bring an increase in trust in the community, reduce brutality and crime, as well as elucidate good cops still around. I feel body cameras will bring more awareness to police departments when it comes to the honesty in their staff’s actions when they are unsupervised. They can be used as hard evidence in courtrooms, to help make the correct judgment on the situation in question.
There have been lots of modern technologies introduced in the United States of America to assist law enforcement agencies with crime prevention. But the use of body-worn cameras by police personnel brings about many unanswered questions and debate. Rising questions about the use of body cam are from concern citizens and law enforcement personnel. In this present day America, the use body cameras by all law enforcement personnel and agencies are one of the controversial topics being discussed on a daily base. Body worn cameras were adopted due to the alleged police brutality cases: for instance, the case of Michael Brown, an African-American who was shot and killed by a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri, on August 2014, Eric Garner died as a result of being put in a chokehold by a New York police officer, and John Crawford, shot and killed by a police officer at a Walmart in Beavercreek, Ohio.
Freddie Grey, Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin, Tamir Rice, John Crawford, Eric Gardner, Jordan Baker.These are just some of the many, many African American people that were killed by the police, all unarmed, all mistreated by the police, all shot and killed, without a crime.. Every twenty-eight hours a life is lost. There are hundreds of innocent lives that are being taken away from their families. Police officers, who are meant to protect and serve, are instead killing and abusing civilians. These outrageous crimes would be avoided through accountability of the police, use of body cameras at all times, and the use of social media.
The researcher hypothesizes that the use of body-cameras on police officers would reduce the instances of gainful communication between civilians and law enforcement. The null-hypothesis is that the use of body-cameras on police officers will have no effect on gainful communication between civilian and law enforcement. In determining the implications of how body-cameras effects civilian behavior, the research will include a sampling survey of criminal justice students and information gathered from journal documents related to research on police body-cameras.
Police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it will build a trust between law enforcement and the community, it will decrease the amount of complaints against police officers, and lastly it will decrease the amount of police abuse of authority. In addition, an officer is also more likely to behave in a more appropriate manner that follows standard operating procedures when encountering a civilian. “A 2013 report by the Department of Justice found that officers and civilians acted in a more positive manner when they were aware that a camera was present” (Griggs, Brandon). Critics claim that the use of body cameras is invasive of the officers and civilians privacy.
Do police officers really need body cameras is a question that has been repeated all throughout the nation. Body cameras are video recording systems that are used by law enforcement to record their interactions with the public and gather video evidence. Most police departments do not wear body cameras currently and the ones that do are in trial phases to see how it works out. There are many advantages to police officers wearing body cameras but in asking the question should they wear body cameras the stakeholders should look at the complete picture. One reason that police and body cameras have constantly been brought up lately are the instances of police brutality happening within the United States. Police brutality within the United States
Thesis: By implementing Body cameras there will be more effective ways to monitor police activity the ability to protect civilians and law officials will greatly increase. Today I would like to share more with everyone the huge issue police brutality plays in our society and hopefully by the end of my speech you will want police officers to wear mandatory body cameras as well.
Was justice really served in the “State of Florida vs. George Zimmerman” case? Is our justice system fair to all races? This case is about a 16 year old kid from Miami named Trayvon Martin. On the night of February 26th, Trayvon walked from his father's house in a gated community to a nearby store. When walking back he was spotted by George Zimmerman, a 28-year-old neighborhood watch volunteer. There had been a number of break-ins in the neighborhood over the last few weeks and Zimmerman though that a young black man walking in the rain and wearing a hooded sweatshirt looked suspicious. Zimmerman then called 911 to report this person who "might be on drugs." He then got out of his car and...
Since surveillance cameras have been invented for security reasons at shopping malls and stores they have also been place in public areas such as stoplights, parking lots, hallways, bus stops, and more.