Blue Collar vs. White Collar Workers During the Progressive Era, a rift between middle class workers formed when the federal government created a new classification system that differentiated between middle class workers who are paid hourly and middle class workers who had a fixed salary (Diner, p.155). The former group became white collar workers and the later developed into blue collar workers. Both these groups worked hard to get what they wanted and many individuals in these groups were able to succeed in reaching their goal of controlling their lives. When forces, such as gender, education, and big business, impacted their work experience, middle class workers rose above these issues and made a living for themselves. While attempting …show more content…
to control their destinies, the white collar and blue collar workers made alliances with each other and used similar action, such as labor unions, to help control their lives. These labor unions then proceeded to shape the Progressive era and its agenda for reform during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. White collar workers were people that had jobs in the office. Clerks, secretaries, bookkeepers, salesmen, and telephone operators were all considered to be white collar jobs. The working environments were mostly in office buildings at a desk for white collar workers. They had an annual salary and were economically comfortable due to their job. The job security in white collar jobs caused many to go into that field of work; during this time period clerical work grew faster than any other major occupation in the country (Diner, p.157). A flood of workers caused many businesses to grow; however, this made it difficult for people to be promoted throughout a company. Instead of learning all the parts to the business, which would allow for employee promotions, these growing offices made their workers learn specialized tasks, causing movement in management to diminish (Diner, p.158). The employees were stuck in their same old position and many were lucky to even get a raise. The force of big business threatened many workers that were trying hard to get a promotion or a raise. However, these same workers were able to stick it out and wait for the flow of people in the profession to switch to another profession that needed workers. This threat on their daily lives was countered by other job openings and the workers’ patience in waiting out the flow of new workers. The opening in these stable jobs led to men and women to work in the same surroundings, which caused even more problems for the white collar workers. Many women took the opportunity to leave the house for the first time and have a job as it was now socially acceptable. These unmarried women tended to work for a few years and then get married, so they could bring in some money to the marriage and thus make them more desirable for suitors. Women rarely got a raise and usually stayed in their position until they looked for another job or quit working entirely (Diner, p.165). Many women tried to stay home and take care of their family, while others fought hard to get a job at a good company. Being in a male-dominated society, these women workers were able to create a woman’s Trade Union League that was composed of middle and upper class women seeking to improve the lives of the women workers who worked as “stenographers, bookkeepers and typists” (Diner, p.162). Gender did not stop these women from going to work and doing a job that men could do without a fuss. Overall, the factor of sex could not change these women’s daily lives and soon men became accustomed to seeing women in the workplace. The ideal white collar family would have been the working father with the family thriving on his income, allowing his wife and children not to work and instead go to school. This image of the “perfect” middle class differed from that of the Victorian middle class. These white collar workers worked for a boss, and tended to not be self-employed. In the previous Victorian era, however, many tried to be entrepreneurs and sustain by themselves as their own boss. Also, the workers usually worked in much larger workplaces compared to that of Victorian times. During that era, many had chances for upward mobility and independence by being their own employer; by the late nineteenth century, these white collar workers had few opportunities to move upward at their job and many felt confined in their position. As they felt confined, they only learned one specialized task in their job field compared to that of the Victorian era where the employee would know all the steps in the business. These changes from the Victorian era started after the Civil War in America. The many economic changes during the time after the war created many new white collar positions for both men and women. This rapid growth developed in both business and professions. Soon, education became a major factor in getting a white collar job. The federal government saw the huge flow of people going to school and soon started to invest in the public school system. Both political sides at the time saw the need for an educated voter and pushed for more people to be “Americanized.” This was very similar to the Northwest Ordinance of 1783, when the federal government gave public subsidies to states to build and run public school systems because they saw the importance of an educated voter. The government deemed that both sexes should be educated on the emphasis that girls need to be good “republican” wives and raise good “republican” children. This good “republican” family became the backbone of the image of the white collar middle class family. Without education, many found it hard to find a job in the white collar job field. This factor played a major impact in many who worked hard to try an achieve a job that would satisfy their economic need but could not reach it because of their educational status. Many new immigrants found it hard to get a job in the United States because of the criteria needed for that job. However, many rose above this and achieved in getting an education at a high school level, or sometimes even higher, and were able to get the white collar job they fought so hard to get. If not, the other option was a blue collar job. Blue Collar workers were people that worked with machines or their hands.
These workers mostly worked in an outdoor environment, and they were paid hourly or by piecework wage. Industrial workers were usually the image that comes to mind when discussing a blue collar job. Other professions that fall under this title were: “skilled craft workers, industrial operatives, and unskilled laborers” (Diner, p.51). Big business played a major power force for many if not all blue collar workers who worked for a corporation. New technology was brought in by many big businesses. These machines could do the same job that many workers did except that the machine did not have to be paid. Many businesses began to undermine the skilled craft workers and they quickly lost their autonomy and their pay declined (Diner, p.54). The great expansion of America’s industrial economy, however, caused these businesses to rely upon the workers once again because the massive increase in need caused the machines to occasionally break. These workers then needed to use their skills once again, and they soon had power and control over their lives. The machines even created a new industry to make parts for itself when it broke, which happened often (Diner, p.53). The factor of big business realized that it still needed its workers and soon gave some power over to them so they could maintain their lives and …show more content…
families. Work that fell under the blue collar label was usually associated with men; however, women soon began to take part in the action of working.
Married women from a blue collar family would make clothing, artificial flowers, and other goods in their homes. These activities soon began to be known as homework (Diner, p.69). In this line of work, mothers were able to keep an eye on their children as they worked together to make goods to sell. While working, they were able to have other mothers over and socialize with them while both mothers earned an income by working. More commonly, married women in working-class families earned extra money by taking in “boarders from their own nationality” (Dinner, p.70).The boarders helped the family economically and enabled mothers to watch over their children at home. The force of women working in blue collar middle class families did not play a major factor in the role of men because working class people depended upon their family for economic security. This was a common aspect of blue collar families in which the wife had to do an extra job for money, and in even some cases the children had to work too for economic
security. As a blue collar worker, being skilled or unskilled played a major part in whether the worker got a job or not. Education in a skill meant that the worker would be a skilled crafter which led to many having “control over the pace of work and the rule of the mill” (Dinner, p. 51). Industry depended heavily on skilled craftsmen because they were the only ones who knew the one way to get the job done. The only way for a worker to know the skill was to be an assistant to a skilled craftsman, and then the worker could get their position. Unions of skilled craftsmen developed a code of “ethical behavior and certain rules for their work;” for instance, they established the amount of pay for their job (Diner, p.52). Having an education in a skill, led to these men having some control in their lives. The factor of education helped improve the power these blue collar workers had over their lives and their families lives. Meanwhile, unskilled laborers were known as “common laborers” or “day laborers” because they worked with their hands and did not operate machinery (Diner, p. 59). Not having an education in a skill, many of these men worked physical tasks such as: “building and repairing train tracks, loading freight in railroad yards and on docks, hauling building materials, digging ditches, paving streets and roads, shoveling coal into industrial furnaces, and moving goods inside factories” (Diner, p.59). These unskilled workers felt the force of education on their backs, and in order to achieve a better economic status or security, they had to learn a skill. Both white collar and blue collar workers attempted to control their lives from these forces, and they soon allied with each other in order to overcome these obstacles. Even though white collar workers prided themselves on having a greater social status than those who worked with their hands, they soon realized that they had to create a union in order to have a voice in the ever-growing big business that they worked for. White collar workers faced problems such as discourteous treatment, rigid management, work strain, less pay, and limited opportunity for advancement, while blue collar workers dealt with the ever looming threat of losing their job to either a stronger worker or a machine, hard long hours, and less pay (Diner, p. 162). The unions that came out from these problems were the International Association of Machinists and The Bookkeepers and Accountants Union NO. 1 of New York (Diner, p. 54, p.162). Even though both of these unions are for completely separate areas of work, they both came back to the umbrella of the American Federation of Labor (AFL) (Diner, p.54, p.162). Both groups sought help from the AFL, which helped them combat the forces of big business, education, and gender, and thus take back control of their lives. This alliance shaped the Progressive Era reform agenda by highlighting the power behind unions and making them an essential aspect of the work force. The Progressive Era brought about change to many different places all other the country. A lot of people were affected by those changes, including blue collar and white collar workers. By meeting the forces head-on, both groups were able to overcome these powerful factors and take command of their lives, setting a precedent for the new century.
We, as a society, feel the need to draw imaginary lines to separate ourselves whether it’s the line between color of our skin, our religion differences, our political beliefs, or the status of our class. As much as I wish there wasn’t a defining line between high class and the educated vs. low class and uneducated, there is. In Mike Rose’s narrative essay “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” he describes his mother’s lack of education and her hard labor work which is the quote on quote the blue collar working class.
Baillargeon also mentions the work that women did in order to earn money to help care for their families. The women she interviewed did many of the same things mentioned by Hollingsworth and Tyyska at home, only a few were employed outside the home. In several cases the husbands of the women did additional work on top of their regular jobs.
When families immigrated to the United States, men were primarily the ones who were expected to learn and bring in wages to support the family. While women did bring in wages as well, they were expected to care for the home and take care of the children. Because of this, women lacked the chance to go to school and become educated because it was boys who were mainly sent to school. Women were only expected to work and earn money to help support the family. In the novel Bread Givers, a book about an immigrant family in New York, one of the daughters named Sara explains her sister’s role by saying, “Bessie would rush home the quicker to help Mother with the washing or ironing, or bring home another bundle of night work, and stay up till all hours to earn another dollar for the house.” In this novel, Bessie’s duties are to help around the house and work all she can to earn money to support her family. She does not have the privilege to go to school and attempt to prepare for a bet...
As mentioned before, sociologists Coontz and Hochschild further elaborate upon Parsons and Bales’ concepts of the American family, but they mostly critique the idea of the male-breadwinner family. One of the main arguments Coontz and Hochschild present is the decline of the male-breadwinner family due to the economic changes of the United States and the arising social norms of consumerism. Because Parsons and Bales never considered how the changes throughout society would affect family, they believed the male-breadwinner family would continue to be a functional type of family for everyone. However, within her text, “What We Really Miss about the 1950s,” Coontz specifically discusses the major expense of keeping mothers at home as consumption norms...
The social and economic developments of the last quarter of the nineteenth century drastically changed the United States. The business world changed once industrialization was introduced to the world. Opportunities grew as people heard about the boundless American opportunities. Immigrants from all races flooded the cities which doubled in population from 1860-1900 (Barnes and Bowles, 2014, p. 34). However, as industries grew, owners prospered off the hard work of others. People started to feel they were not being treated fairly. People had to work harder and longer for their money. Barnes and Bowles (2014) noted “In the era of industrialization, millions of workers fought to simply have the right to work in safe conditions, and earn a fair wage” (p. 45). Many Americans feared that giant corporations would one day seek to restrict the ability of common people to get ahead and curtail individual freedoms. These fears were particularly strong among farmers, laborers, an...
Since factories started to incorporate machines through industrialization, the required long hours were not needed anymore. The working class wanted to have more freedom away from their jobs. “They also desired more free time to rest, eat their dinners, enjoy conversations and drink beer” (Green 162). Since the rest of America was enjoying freedom, the working class wanted to have a part in it as well. The idea of not being dependent on their wages, was extremely important to the working class at this time. Also with factories mainly supplying unskilled work, skilled workers started to feel degraded in their proud craft. “By the same token, proud American and European craftsmen viewed other forms of unskilled or menial labor as degrading” (Green 107). Although factories allowed their skilled workers to keep their jobs, they expected them to take a pay cut. Also with the pay cut, the skilled workers were forced to give up the skilled work that they took pride in. With workers becoming frustrated with not having freedom and, skilled workers not being treated fairly unions were
Despite the phenomenal economic growth many American laborers lived at or below the poverty level. While some advances were made like welfare capitalism, which raised wages, shortened the work week, and instituted paid vacations. Modest company made labor unions emerged in many industries, these unions gave some help to solving labor grievances. But in the end welfare capitalism was only adopted by a few employers and workers still had no control over their fates. Most employers tried to keep their labor costs low and with a nearly endless supply of unskilled workers there were an endless supply of people to fill jobs.
However, social conditions made it less feasible for families to live this way. As the 1960s approached and consumption was in high demand, women were yet again, forced to join the work force; but only a quarter of the women joined the workforce, whereas in the 1990s about “two-thirds of women who had children were in the work force (Coontz 55). Coontz (1997) explains how by 1973, “real wages were falling for young families, and by the late 1970s, government effectiveness had decreased (Coontz 54). It was because of economic factors that the nuclear bread-winning family could only be a lifestyle a few can afford. Nonetheless, women joining the workforce created a new understanding of women-hood, changed women’s status in society, and created conflict within the household. Women did not have the time to complete all the household tasks which contributed to the increased divorce rates, but left women happier due to the fact that they had that ultimate
During this time, women had limited options as far as work was concerned. As time went on, more and more women were forced to work, because they had no husband and no other means of building up a dowry for a husband. By 1910 the wage labor force was made up of about 20% of women as young as fourteen. The wages these women earned were unbelievably low, and at times as much as 80% lower than the wages men earned. Possible job opportunities for the women included options such as a textile factory, which consisted of clothing and fabric production. In these factories, the women ran high risks to their health. More wealthy people would hire these women for domestic services such as nannies, or house servants. These jobs sometimes required the woman to live at that residence, and the women ran the constant risk of being molested by a higher-class ranking individual. Department stores were also willing to hire women. However, the set-back to this type of work was that the women were sometimes expected to purchase expensive dress up clothing that most of the time they couldn’t afford. The women were advised to “round out their meager salaries by finding a ‘”gentleman friend”’ to purchase clothing and pleasures”(Peiss, 79).
the middle class was growing in size and influence, and the working poor were leaving their
During the Great War and the huge amount of men that were deployed created the need to employ women in hospitals, factories, and offices. When the war ended the women would return home or do more traditional jobs such as teaching or shop work. “Also in the 1920s the number of women working raised by fifty percent.” They usually didn’t work if they were married because they were still sticking to the role of being stay at home moms while the husband worked and took care of the family financially. But among the single women there was a huge increase in employment. “Women were still not getting payed near as equally as men and were expected to quit their jobs if they married or pregnant.” Although women were still not getting payed as equally it was still a huge change for the women's
For years, the middle class was the American Dream. It was the place where many American families lived comfortably, saved modestly, and on special occasions had the ability to splurge. However, in recent years the middle class has struggled. As the cost of living is on the rise, the standard wages are not moving at the same rate thus making it more challenging for the middle class to maintain their position let alone move up, causing the middle class to shrink.
The bourgeoisie, also known as the middle class, gained money and power as the industrial capitalism got stronger. They consisted of merchants, tradesmen, and professionals. In the middle class, the men worked outside the home to support their families, while the women stayed at home to take care of the house and children. Unfortunately, the lower class was unable to do the same. All the members of the family had to work to support each other. Dennis Sherman and Joyce Salisbury ( 2008) state in the textbook “The West In The World”, that the people of the working class had to work six days a week, twelve to sixteen hours a day, earning only a small amount of money ( p.277).
These divisions of labor cannot be discussed as static representations of society, but as a “murky boundary between work for subsistence and work for the market.” During the twelfth through the seventeenth centuries in Europe, both men and women participated in the market by selling goods, earning wages, and running business establishments, amongst other activities. Kimmel argued that child bearing was considered one of the main categories of sexual difference, which restricted women’s access to certain professions. Moreover, women were tasked with “brewing, baking, caring for poultry and animals [,]…working wool and flax into cloth, and also watching children, cleaning house, and preparing meals” as part imposed by societies expectation of gender. As Judith M. Bennett argued, whereas occupations of women changed through time, their work continued to be low-skilled and low-paid. Men’s jobs was the primary household economy and were publicly recognized by their profession, which was not the same case for women. The sexual division of labor also reflected the sexual inequality between the sexes, where the distribution of labor and resources was
As I look back on everything I learned from pre-k through college, there are a lot of key points I can reflect on from learning different sociological perspectives in college. This leads to the perspective [separate spheres], which according to Skolnick (2011) is “the distinction and expectations of men and women roles” (Skolnick, 2011 p84). When I was younger I never looked at my parent’s occupations and placed them in the [separate spheres] perspective, until I entered college. After taking a couple of sociology courses, I connected my parents to the expectation of the perspective [separate spheres]. My mom always worked and came home to cook dinner, clean, and prepare clothing for the following day. While my dad on the other hand always worked two jobs, and rarely came home to help my mom contribute to any of the house norms she did every day after work. This made me realize that this perspective not only took place in 1840-1890, but it still consists in society norms