Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media portrayal of crime victims
Distortion of crime by media
Media role in crime research paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media portrayal of crime victims
According to CNN Library (2015), in October 2002, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo became a sniper team in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area by killing ten people and injuring three. Muhammad and Malvo achieved this by creating a sniper nest in the back of Muhammad’s car which was a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice Sedan. Looking at the crime from different sources, the media plays a big role in how the crime is portrayed.
Blue Caprice Film on Netflix
There is a movie currently on Netflix called Blue Caprice (2013). The movie is basically supposed to be a reenactment of the 2002 crime. In the film, there were a number of frames present. The first frame that was presented, at the very beginning of the movie, was the blocked opportunities frame. Lee Boyd Malvo’s mother was never home with him because she was a single parent and had to work in order to feed her. This frame was also present in another part of the movie when Malvo was at the grocery store with John Allen Muhammed. Malvo got caught stealing food from the grocery store. The reason he was stealing food was because he was hungry.
…show more content…
The only thing he was eating daily was honey and crackers. At that time, Malvo and Muhammed were moving place to place because they had nowhere to stay or money. The next frames presented in the movie were the social breakdown frame and the faulty system frame. In the movie, the actor playing as Muhammed went on a rant about how he was fried from the U.S. Army, but he did not state the reason. Soon after being fired, he and his wife got a divorce which led to the next frame. The faulty system frame exists because while he was in the woods teaching Malvo how to shoot, he was talking about how he children were taken away from him because courts never give fathers custody. The criminological theories that were present in this case were sociological and political. Muhammed influenced Malvo because he knew Malvo looked to him as a father figure. Malvo became a criminal because he was around Muhammed. Technically, Muhammed was already a criminal because he took his kids away without permission of the courts. Once Malvo learned how to shoot, he became just as much as a criminal as Muhammed was. Political theories come into play when Muhammed was in the grocery store where most of the shoppers were predominantly white. He was saying how they have Whites think they will have the higher social status forever and how they do not have worries. He was referring to how he was currently out of a job and struggling for money and that Whites rarely experience the same economic struggles. Crimes of the Century; CNN episode on D.C. Snipers The Crimes of the Century (2015) episode on CNN was actually a short documentary of how that crime happened. The episode did not start off with background information of the two men, Malvo and Muhammed. They were focusing on where the crimes were happening and what kind of gun was being used. The part of the case that really shocked the public was how often the shooting were happening.
It was said that shootings with a rifle in the Montgomery County area were rare and by that time it had already been three shootings within two days. Since, every time a shooting happened, a witness saw a “white, box truck” nearby, police assumed that would be the vehicle that the snipers would be in. Once the news got hold of that information, different news anchors started to create possible profiles for the sniper. First, they thought it was only one person responsible for the shooting. They then went on to say that the sniper was a white, middle-aged male with a high degree of anxiety and military experience. One of the detectives in the case assumed that once these shootings started happening, that it was dealing with terrorists because 9/11 had just happened the previous
year. The shootings being brought to the media caused ultimate fear to the community. Parents were afraid to send their kids to school. People were changing their routines. For example, after the shootings, some people started to duck while they pumped their gas at the gas station. Another example is that if a person were to go to the grocery store, they would not walk in a straight line. They would walk crisscross. During that time, when people saw a white van or truck, they assumed the sniper was the driver. In this media source, psychological theories were present. Muhammed’s ex-wife said that when he returned home from the military, his spirit was “broken” and he was not the same person as before he left. As a result of him being unstable, he developed a criminal personality. He threatened to kill his ex-wife. He wanted revenge because he lost the custody battle of their three children. He believed that he was living in a racist society because the court did not grant him custody. A woman in the documentary seemed like she was trying to find reasons why Malvo would kill those people. She went on to explain that Malvo was very “unhappy with his family situation and he was suicidal.” She also said that because he did not have a father figure, it was easy for him to be influenced by Muhammed because Muhammed gave him attention and watched over him. People’s Magazine Article This article in People’s magazine titled D.C. Killings 10 Years Later the Sniper’s Wife (2012) focused on the character of the sniper, John Allen Muhammed. Muhammed’s ex-wife was interviewed by People’s Magazine about how their marriage went. Mildred Muhammed, John’s ex-wife described him as “manipulative and emotionally abusive.” Some people still blame Mildred for the fear he caused the nation. She wanted to let the public know that she was just as afraid of him as they were. The criminological theory expressed in his source, seemed to be psychological theories. Mildred mentioned that Muhammed was not the same when he came home from the army. This could possibly be due to Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Most individuals who return home from deployment battle with this condition. His behavior changed. He stalked his ex-wife. Malvo even reported that he was sexually abused by Muhammed. This crime influenced the social construction of reality. This shooting spree occurred over the course of three weeks. It made it seem like shootings were very common in the DC area at the time, when, in actuality, they were not. It also gave the idea that crime rates were increasing, when they have actually been decreasing as time goes by. This traumatic event left people in fear because they thought they would be the next target.
Police also had fingerprints from the buick the was used in the South Braintree crime. But the fingerprints didn’t match and the police instead questioned them on their religion, political beliefs and associates, instead of the crime. The prosecutors used witnesses, but the witness accounts made no sense. Meaning it didn’t match the descriptions of the men and the stories weren’t the same and had loopholes. One witness said she saw the shooting from 60 feet away and said one of the men, which she said was Sacco, had big hands but he had small hands.
In the Frontline documentary Raising Adam Lanza, reporters Alaine Griffin and Josh Kovner from “The Hartford Courant” investigate the possibilities that prompted Adam Lanza to commit the horrific shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Lanza didn’t leave behind a trail. Lanza didn’t leave a diary, wasn’t socially involved (had no friends), and destroyed his computer that many believe have the answers as to what induced his character to murder 20 children, six adults, and his own mother. The documentary commenced with Griffin and Kovner exploring the life of Nancy Lanza who had been portrayed by the media as the person to blame for her son’s actions but also to be questioned on whether or not she truly was a victim.
Scott Peterson was an educated man from California Polytechnic State University where he graduated with a B.A. in Agricultural Business. He was married to his wife Laci Peterson who was also pregnant with their unborn son. In December of 2002 Laci Peterson went missing in the Modesto, California area where she shared a home with Scott. Once the investigation of Scott’s missing wife started authorities began to suspect Scott as a suspect in her disappearance. In April of 2003 a fetus and a female torso that was missing hands, feet, and a head were found on the shoreline of San Francisco Bay. The San Francisco Bay area was where Scott was boating the day of Laci’s disappearance. The body was later identified as Laci Peterson and the fetus as Laci and Scott’s unborn son. Scott was also arrested in the month of April shortly after the discovery of Laci and their son’s body and was later sentenced to the death penalty. Over the course of this paper I will cover the whole event of the disappearance of Laci Peterson, relating it to a sociological theory, the impact the event had on our society and how the media had influence over this national event.
October 2002 was the beginning of what seemed like the longest three weeks in the Washington Metropolitan Area. No one wanted to believe that what was happening would change the lives of thousands. What appeared to be a random killing spree by an enraged lunatic, turned out to be part of a massive plan that claimed the lives of ten innocent people in DC, Maryland, and Virginia. When these shootings first began, they were believed to be linked to a white van or truck. It was later discovered that these shootings were being carried out by a man named John Allen Muhammad, and his teenage accomplice Lee Boyd Malvo, in a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice sedan.
Over a three week period in October 2002 a series of random sniper attacks paralyzed the Washington D.C. area. The shootings happened in in various establishments such as super markets, gas stations, restaurants and near schools turning normal tranquil areas into chaotic murder fields. There were no age group, gender or ethnicity that was safe, Victims were randomly selected and everyone was targeted. After the murderous spree, ten people were declared dead and several others wounded. The perpetrators were finally apprehended while they were sleeping at a resting spot and later identified as forty-one-year-old John Allen Muhammad and his seventeen-year-old Jamaican-American protégé, Lee Boyd Malvo.
This is when I had known that the criminal justice system had mad various errors with this case. For instance the only evidence that the police had, had at the time was a description of the suspect, from the victim’s husband whose adrenaline level was very high. In my opinion when a traumatic thing just occurred I think it would of been best to of asked the eye witness what the suspect had looked like multiple times and giving a good length time period between when I asked. As well as when they arrested Brenton, the first mistake I noticed was how they claimed they found/captured the murderer of Mary Ann Stevens right away. The second mistake I noticed was how they asked the victim’s husband if Brenton Butler was the one who had pulled the trigger killing his wife. Now usually from what I’ve seen when police want someone to be identified the police do a couple things: 1. Capture Multiple people and 2. Have them stand in a police station while the witness picks out who he/she suspects was the suspect. Now the police did not do that, they captured one suspect and had him sit in the back of a cop car while the eye witness, which in this case was Mary Ann’s husband, judge from a distance to see if that was the boy who killed his wife. Additionally when they made that arrest my immediate question was why did the forensic team in which ever unit test Brenton Butler hands and clothes for gun
In conclusion, the Kent State shooting was a tragedy that has never really had anyone held responsible. Thirty-eight years later, “Official investigations as to exactly what happened at Kent State were inconclusive.” The days preceding the shootings, the students burned down the ROTC building, protested on the commons, and threw rubbish at police officers. The violent actions of the students put the law enforcement officials and National Guardsmen around them on edge. On the other side, the Guardsmen arrived in full combat gear to put down unarmed college students. There was no reason for the soldiers to fire at the students that were hundreds of feet away from them. Whether one of the soldiers fired in a moment of panic or if they were order to commence shooting may never be known.
On April 19th, 1989, Trisha Meili was the victim of violent assault, rape, and sodomy. The vicious attack left her in a coma for 12 days and The New York Times described it as “one of the most widely publicized crimes of the 1980’s.” The documentary, The Central Park Five, reveals the truth about what happened the night of April 19th, and how the subordinate group of young black boys were wrongly convicted. Analyzing the conflict theory of crime in association to the case of the central park five, understanding the way they were treated based on setting, why it was so easy for the law enforcement to pin the crime on the young black boys, and how wrongly convicting someone has great consequences along with relating it
The Web. The Web. 08 May 2014. Pilkington, Ed. - "The 'Pilot'" "Sandy Hook Report – Shooter Adam Lanza Was Obsessed with Mass Murder."
The article titled “At last we know why the Columbine killers did it” shows an in-depth look into the minds of Harris and Klebold. Cullen explained that people went on to believe one of two wrong conclusions about the Columbine shooters. One: they were taking revenge on the bullies or two: that the “massacre was inexplicable: we can never understand what drove them to such horrific violence” (At last we know, Cullen).
When horrific crimes occur in large cities, many of them can be chalked up to gang violence or to the larger population of that specific city. But when horrific crimes happen in small cities like Lincoln, Nebraska, people begin to ask questions like who did this and why. In 1958, a nineteen year old man named Charles Starkweather put the entire state of Nebraska and possibly the entire nation in a state of terror. With his murder spree taking only three days, Starkweather had collected a body count of ten bodies, including two teenagers and a young child. Understanding Starkweather’s past and state of mind begins to answer the second question of why.
When the first responder got to the scene he adimatately meet the 911 caller, who lead him to a car in an apartment parking lot. The car doors were closed and all of the windows were fogged. The police officer used his flashlight to see inside of the car before opening the door. He found a young African American woman who had been shot several times. The officers quickly called for backup, investigators and medical personnel. While awaiting for their arrival he secured the crime scene with caution tape, creating an initial perimeter setup as discussed in lecture two. Once everyone arrived he left it to them to search the car while he talked to the 911 caller, witnesses and others who had information on who had been present in the car. The investigators were able to collect physical evidence of bullets and cartage casings that were found outside the vehicle and inside the vehicle on the floorboard of the driver’s side. The team determined the bullets came from a 40 caliber. Other types of physical evidence that were found on the scene were the bloody clothing on the victim, the victim’s cell phone and fibers in the car from the driver’s side. personnel at the scene crime took several photographs, powered test for finger prints and did a blood spatter analysis. Stewart’s autopsy revealed that she had been shot at close range in the left hand once and in the
In recent years, the subject of crime has become an increasingly important theme of political, academic, and public debate. In particular, the media today is more focused on victims than it has ever been before. Through media representations of the ‘ideal victim’, this essay will subsequently show how the media are able to construct and re-affirm pre-existing traditional ideologies within the public realm. In effect, this assignment will critically assess the concept of an ‘ideal victim’ and show how the media have used this when describing crime.
From examining John F. Kennedy’s assassination, many people have come to the conclusion that there was a second party involved in the shooting of the President of the United States. The writers give great theories and facts leading people to believe that the Warren Report was false and later used to cover up the death of John Kennedy. With this great information out to the public it is obvious that the mob was involved with the planning assassination. After, all this evidence it only makes sense that the Warren Report is false, and that the mob was involved the whole time.
However, despite being regarded as unnecessary rumors by a section of the American society and government, many media people and houses reported harrowing incidents of murder, rape, carjacking and assaults. There were also media reports about a significant number of urban legends who sprouted at the height of the commotion brought about by Hurricane Katrina – systematic children rapists and a 7-year-old’s throat being slit. However, media reports aside, these contentions remain just that. Nevertheless, although a significant count of th...