Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pascals wager criticism
Pascals wager criticism
Pascals wager criticism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pascals wager criticism
Religion has always been a major part of mankind’s history. Since the very beginning of the human race, people have been worshipping and have dedicated their lives to God; the earliest kind of worshipping can be traced back to about 295,000 years BCE. Over the years, humanity has assisted to the creation of numerous religions, however, with the development of modern science and the several researches, people slowly start to lose faith and need more proves to believe in God’s existence. In a progressive society like ours, people tend to ask themselves “Is God real?” We are going to try to answer this existential question by studying in a first part Blaise Pascal’s Wager theory to support God’s existence, Immanuel Kant’s moral philosophy in a …show more content…
Being able to prove His existence mathematically convinced a significant number of people; however, as Pascal said, it is just hypotheses and there is no definite proofs of God’s existence in his formula, it is only a probability. Immanuel Kant found a way to contradict the …show more content…
The overman is incredibly interesting, yet the most controversial thesis about a superior power in history. This book is mainly known for the misinterpretation of Nietzsche’s “God is dead” (1891). The Catholic church still misinterprets this sentences nowadays. By that, the German philosopher meant that humans are destroying the religion and its Judeo-Christian moral values; he thinks that theists are simply naive. “All beings so far have created something beyond themselves; and do you want to be the ebb of this great flood, and even go back to the beasts rather than overcome men?” (Nietzsche, 1891). Friedrich Nietzsche claims an exemplary human has to pass through self-realization and shouldn’t rely on a God to create his/her own identity. The overman is not the evolution of mankind, it is a man that is able to go beyond what he currently is; “one whose inexhaustible fertility and power keep up the faith in men”. (Nietzsche, 1891). He believes that everyone can become the overman with disregard for happiness, reason, virtues, justice and compassion. “Men is a rope, tied between beast and overman—a rope over an abyss…” (Nietzsche, 1891). To the German thinker, the creation of new morals would engender an overman to
He further elaborates the topic by speaking on the idea that God is a Necessary being who has no cause but He is the cause of everything and He is the one who sustained this universe. In conclusion of the chapter, Rachels stated that idea of the existence of God will always remain in the contemplations of religious people and arguments used in this chapter needs more convincing evidence to prove the existence of God in this Universe. The chapter commenced by the most thought-provoking argument that “Is it Reasonable to Believe in God?”. The author to explicit this argument gives the result of Gallop polls and the polls conducted by Pew research center, which indicates that the underdeveloped countries are more religious than the developed countries and specifically in United states only 56% of the people consider religion as the most important part of their lives. Furthermore, the author discussed that no one detects the God existence by ordinary means, however, some people can have the sensation that God is somewhere around them no matter if they cannot see, heard or touch Him.
Religion has been a controversial topic among philosophers and in this paper I am focusing
Thesis: Pascal’s Wager calls for the need for people to choose to believe in something, to allow them the chance of gaining more than ever, and with that your chances for gain will be higher with the belief of a god, but the highest with the belief in the God of the Bible.
Pascal’s Wager was a major strength of his theory on God and Religion. The argument made in Pascal’s Wager is an example of apologetic philosophy. It was written and published in Pensées by the 17th century French philosopher Blaise Pascal. Pascal’s Wager claims that all humans must bet their lives on whether God exists. He argues that rational people should seek to believe in God. If God does not exist the loss is minimal, but if God does exist there is an infinite gain, eternity in Heaven. It was a ground-breaking theory because it utilized probability theory and formal decision theory. Pascal’s Wager is applicable both to atheists and theists. While other philosophies may
In this paper I will be discussing Pascal’s Wager. What I first plan to do in this paper is explain the argument of Pascal’s Wager. Next I will explain how Pascal tries to convince non-theists why they should believe in God. I will then explain two criticisms in response to Pascal’s argument. Finally, I will discuss whether or not these criticisms show Pascal’s reasoning to be untenable.
While critical of the attitude found in the ressentiment of slave morality, Nietzsche’s includes it as an important factor contributing to the bad conscience of man. Even though Nietzsche dislikes the negative results of bad conscience – man’s suppression of his instincts, hate for himself, and stagnation of his will -- Nietzsche does value it for the promise it holds. Nietzsche foresees a time coming when man conquers his inner battle and regains his “instinct of freedom.” In anticipation of that day’s eventual arrival, Nietzsche views the development of bad conscience as a necessary step in man’s transformation into the “sovereign individual.”
We have grown weary of man. Nietzsche wants something better, to believe in human ability once again. Nietzsche’s weariness is based almost entirely in the culmination of ressentiment, the dissolution of Nietzsche’s concept of morality and the prevailing priestly morality. Nietzsche wants to move beyond simple concepts of good and evil, abandon the assessment of individuals through ressentiment, and restore men to their former wonderful ability.
Modern debates over religion, more specifically God, focus primarily on whether or not sufficient evidence exists to either prove or disprove the existence of a God. Disbelievers such as biologist Richard Hawkins tend to point to the indisputable facts of evolution and the abundance of scientific evidence which seem to contradict many aspects of religion. Conversely, believers such as Dr. A. E. Wilder-Smith describe the controversial aspects of science, and how the only possible solution to everything is a supreme being. However, mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal refused to make either type of argument; he believed that it was impossible to determine God’s existence for certainty through reason. Instead, he suggested that rational individuals should wager as though God does indeed exist, because doing so offers these individuals everything to gain, and nothing to lose. Unfortunately, Pascal’s Wager contains numerous fallacies, and in-depth analysis of each one of his arguments proves that Pascal’s Wager is incorrect.
P. 38-39, Friedrich Nietzsche, “Beyond Good and Evil” Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, translated by Judith Norman, Cambridge University Press, 2002
The proof for the existence of God is an issue that may never be resolved. It has caused division among families and friends, nations and society. The answer to the question “does God exist?” is almost an impossible one to give with certainty seeing that there is a variety of people, ideas, cultures and beliefs. So how does one know if one’s actions here on earth could have eternal consequences? What is, if any, a “safe bet” to make? Blaise Pascal was a 15th century philosopher and a mathematician who proposed the idea that although one cannot know for certain that God exists, one can make a “safe bet” that it is far better to believe in God than not to believe in God. This is not a proof for the existence of God but rather an idea that suggest that if there is a God, it is in the person’s benefit to believe rather to disbelieve because the odds are in favor of the believer. This gambler-like idea is better known as “Pascal’s Wager” or “The Gambler’s Argument.” Nevertheless, this sort of play-the-ponies idea is not quite precise. Although Pascal’s Wager serves as a stepping-stone for non-believers, it is a rather vague, faithless and inaccurate argument.
Religion is an organized collection of beliefs and cultural systems that entail the worship of a supernatural and metaphysical being. “Religion just like other belief systems, when held onto so much, can stop one from making significant progress in life”. Together with religion come traditions that provide the people with ways to tackle life’s complexities. A subscription to the school of thought of great scholars
Pascal’s Wager is an argument for the existence of God. Pascal’s Wager was written by Blaise Pascal, who was a French philosopher and mathematician during the 17th century. Pascal says that it is in our best interest to believe in God. The wager argues that we should believe that God exists, as it is the best option. The wager attempts to justify the belief in God through an appeal to self-interest rather than an appeal to evidence. Pascal argues that reason and intellect cannot alone decided whether God exists or not. Therefore, it would be the beneficial to us if indeed we just decided to believe that God does exist. Meaning that it is in our best interests to believe in God of Christianity. Pascal’s wager tries to justify Christian faith
Wyatt, C. (2010). Friedrich Nietzsche. In Tameri Guide for Writers. Retrieved December 6, 2010, from http://www.tameri.com/csw/exist/nietzsche.shtml
Friedrich Nietzsche was a critic and a German Philosopher from the 18th century. Nietzsche was the father of psychoanalysis and he formulated several philosophical concepts that have greatly contributed to the understanding of human nature. Nietzsche ideas had been misinterpreted by many people over time specifically, due to his style of writing. Nietzsche style of writing was adopted to strengthen his arguments on various controversial topics. In this paper, I will discuss Nietzsche’s idea of naturalistic morality, master morality, self-mastery morality, and how they connect with the affirmation of nature and strength.
Since the dawn of man he has looked up toward the heavens with curiosity and wonder. In an effort to explain the natural phenomenon occurring in the environment around him, the sun, the moon, the stars, the wind, the rain and even his very existence, he created the concept of God. Whether the ideology be that of polytheism or monotheism the concept was similar, if what was happening was beyond man’s control or understanding then that action would most likely be attributed to God(s). As man began to accumulate knowledge the ideas and rituals surrounding God(s) became more intricate and complex. The purpose of this paper is to explore how man’s relationship with God(s) has shaped his views regarding his self, society nature and the world.