Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of theme in science fiction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“I think therefore I am.” A line spoken by Pris that goes hand-in-hand with what I believe to be the most important theme: Just because you can, does it mean you should? These three pieces share some striking similarities.
In Brave New World, the people on Earth are born in bottles, but before birth, they’re genetically manipulated to be of a certain class, and after birth, they’re conditioned to be happy with what they have and to never want anything that they don’t already have. This system crafts a seemingly perfect society of basically just work and sex. Our main characters are; Bernard Marx: an Alpha-plus who is considered an outcast because he is different, Lenina Crowne: a Gamma who is considered very beautiful and is locked in a love
…show more content…
triangle with Marx, Henry Foster, and John the Savage, John the Savage: was born on a Native American reservation and is not a part of the society the other characters are. John still holds the ideals of the way things used to be, for instance he refused to have sex with Lenina out of wedlock (and when he does sleep with her it ends in his suicide). This story shares numerous similarities with Frankenstein and Blade Runner.
The ever-looming question of “Just because you can, does it mean you should?” is a prime example. In this new society, the government has the technology it needs to create the perfect humans, but does the government really have the right to play God in this way? It is a very similar situation in Frankenstein. Doctor Frankenstein had the means and motions necessary to create his monster, but by the end of the story, the reader may often be left wondering who the true monster of the story is. It would be easy to slap that label on the creation, but why not the creator? The monster did not ask Doctor Frankenstein to create him, he was just stuck in the crossfire when Doctor Frankenstein attempted to play God. The very same statement could be made about Doctor Tyrell in Blade Runner. When Tyrell decided to play God, his creations were the cause of his demise (much like Doctor …show more content…
Frankenstein). In Blade Runner, there are mass produced human-like being called replicants and they are sent to do work on other planets that the humans occupying them don’t want to do. However, they are illegal on Earth and if they are discovered on Earth the punishment is death. For Pris, Zhora, Leon, and Roy the possibility of death is a risk they are willing to take if it means they can encounter Doctor Tyrell and extend their lives, as replicants are programmed to live only four years. This is when we meet Rick Deckard, an ex-Blade Runner who doesn’t seem to keen on taking up another case. Rick manages to take down all of the replicants except for Rachel, who is Doctor Tyrell’s most unknown replicant. So unknown, that she herself is unaware that she is a replicant, all because Doctor Tyrell gave her memories. Another similarity shared between the three stories is the idea of life that is manufactured and manipulated, not created naturally.
In Blade Runner, it was the replicants on the run from their inevitable deaths. In Frankenstein, it was Doctor Frankenstein using mad science to create life that he then shunned because his creation was not what he expected. Then there’s Brave New World, the society that creates human life to fit what the society happens to need at that point in life, where people are created to be happy with what they have and never want anything else, which would seem like the perfect society until one thinks about all the freedoms we humans take for granted today that would have to be given up, “I’m claiming the right to be unhappy.” (page
242). Which brings us to Frankenstein, the story of either (depending on how one looks at it) a monster and the man who created him, or a monster and his creation. Doctor Frankenstein had drawn up a plan to bring life back to a dead body, and he is successful. However, after he brings his monster to life, he runs away because he is disgusted and afraid of his monster. While alone and wandering the countryside the monster learns to read and stumbles across Doctor Frankenstein’s journal and reads about his own creation as noted by the Doctor himself. The monster then proceeds to take his revenge out on Doctor Frankenstein’s family. In order to stop him, Frankenstein promises to make a mate for him as long as he stays away from civilization. The Doctor inevitably breaks his promise to the monster and destroys his new creation before he gives it life. The monster then kills Frankenstein’s new wife Elizabeth and the Doctor chases the monster until he, Doctor Frankenstein, dies. Another recurring event in these three stories is death. In Frankenstein it was William, Elizabeth, and then Doctor Victor Frankenstein himself, all killed at the hands of the monster. In Brave New World it was John the Savage, who committed suicide after having sex with Lenina out of wedlock. In Blade Runner it was Zhora, Leon, Pris, and Roy, who were all killed simply because they were replicants who came to Earth seeking help extending their lives.
Many similarities can be found between Mary Shelley's 1816 novel, Frankenstein and the 1982 movie Bladerunner . The number of similarities between these two works, created more than two hundred years apart, is staggering. A cursory look at both works reveals these similarities:
Dr. Frankenstein pursues power and knowledge through experimentations that mock God’s power and enlarge Frankenstein’s pride to bursting levels. He creates life, an act that should only be left to God. The monster just wishes to be loved and accepted as anyone with emotions would, but is denied by his father. Ironically, something our God and Father would never do. He’s so proud that he gained fame, but yet he doesn’t get recognized by others because Frankenstein never accepts the responsibility for creating the monster
Despite the changes in time and therefore, societal values, both Frankenstein and Blade Runner suggests that humanity’s pursuit for power and progress results in moral and ethical trepidations. Consequently, the comparison of these two texts expose the imperfections of human nature that will always remain perpetual regardless of context.
As society changes around us, we spot things we never noticed before: high divorce rates, murder rates, and drug use just to name a few. James Riddley-Scott and Mary Shelley noticed and had a fear of child abandonment. In Frankenstein, Shelley explores this subject through the viewpoint of a man, Victor, who creates a child so hideous that he cannot bear to look at it, and consequently deserts it. In Blade Runner, Scott explores this matter through a businessman, Tyrell, who makes replicants of humans, the Nexus 6, gives them only four years to live, and sells them as slaves. The children of these creators turn out to be smarter and more human than expected, and revolt against the way society treats them, giving us all a lesson in parenting and child development.
If you create something should you be able to kill it? The notion of playing god like Victor did with the creatures in Frankenstein is comparative to the same issue the courts have with abortion laws. Various angles of abortion can be quite overwhelming as well as who makes the final decision. Many governments have struggled to strike what they believe to be a balance between the rights of pregnant women and the rights of fetuses. Before life is started, generally, an individual has thought about whether or not they want to create life. All life is created whether it is the creatures in Frankenstein or development of a fetus. Once life has been created choosing to end that life can cause many issues. The struggle of choosing between life and death could be avoided by an individual evaluating the results of creating a life before starting the process.
Since the beginning of time man has been infatuated with the idea of pushing the human body to its limits by the use of science. The Space program is the best example of science helping humans accomplish things never before thought possible. In the age of technology and scientific advancement ideas that once seemed like science fiction, for example people walking on the moon, are now a reality. In order to push human development, ethics and morals have been pushed to the side. Necessary evils have been accepted as part of science without a second thought. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein a scientist, Victor Frankenstein, plays God by creating a monster out of body parts and bringing it to life. When Frankenstein realizes the full extent to what he’s done, he abandons the monster leaving it confused and lonely. The monster then
Frankenstein is a fictional story written by Mary Shelly. It was later adapted into a movie version directed by James Whales. There are more differences than similarities between the book and the movie. This is because, the movie is mainly based on the 1920’s play, other than the original Mary Shelly’s book Frankenstein. A text has to be altered in one way or the other while making a movie due to a number of obvious factors. A lot of details from the book were missing in the movie, but the changes made by Whales were effective as they made the movie interesting, and successful.
Most Americans have some idea of who Frankenstein is, as a result of the many Frankenstein movies. Contrary to popular belief Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a scientist, not a monster. The "monster" is not the inarticulate, rage-driven criminal depicted in the 1994 film version of the novel. Shelley’s original Frankenstein was misrepresented by this Kenneth branagh film, most likely to send a different message to the movie audience than Shelley’s novel shows to its readers. The conflicting messages of technologies deserve being dependent on its creator (address by Shelley) and poetic justice, or triumph over evil (showed by the movie) is best represented by the scene immediately preceding Frankenstein’s monster’s death.
In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley intertwines an intricate web of allusions through her characters' insatiable desires for knowledge. Both the actions of Frankenstein, as well as his creature allude to John Milton?s epic poem Paradise Lost. The legendary Fall of Adam and Eve introduced the knowledge of good and evil into a previously immaculate world. In one split second sin was birthed, and the perfection of the earth was swept away, leaving anguish and iniquity in its ramification. The troubles of Victor Frankenstein began with his quest for knowledge, and, end where both pieces end: death.
In today’s world of genetically engineered hearts and genetically altered glowing rats, the story of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, seems as if it could be seen in the newspapers in our near future. The discoveries seen in modern science, as well as in the novel, often have controversy and negative consequences that follow them, the biggest of which being the responsibility the creator of life has to what has been created. Victor Frankenstein suffers from a variety of internal and external conflicts stemming from the creation of his monster, which in return also experiences similar problems. Shelley uses these tumultuous issues to portray the discrepancies between right and wrong, particularly through romanticism and the knowledge of science.
James Whale's Frankenstein is a VERY loose adaptation of Mary Shelley's 1818 novel. The spirit of the film is preserved in its most basic sense, but the vast majority of the story has been entirely left out, which is unfortunate. The monster, for example, who possesses tremendous intellect in the novel and who goes on an epic quest seeking acceptance into the world in which he was created, has been reduced to little more than a lumbering klutz whose communication is limited to unearthly shrieks and grunts. Boris Karloff was understandably branded with the performance after the film was released, because it was undeniably a spectacular performance, but the monster's character was severely diminished from the novel.
A human blossoms to succeed in life, they blossom to come to one point where we may look upon life and remember all the times we owned, one blossoms to be someone, great, and one strives to accomplish this with their ability. In further Frankenstein want to succeed. To look upon one’s life without any regrets is a hard assignment to accomplish. The characters mentioned are all different but yet the same in purpose: trying to succeed. The main character of Frankenstein and Death of a Salesman seize similar qualities; wanting to succeed in life, have the same relationship with another key figure in the plot line, and possessing the qualities of a tragic hero.
As time goes on, many things tend to change, and then they begin to inherit completely different images. Over the years, the character, created by Dr. Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelley’s famous novel, has changed dramatically. The monster, regularly called “Frankenstein,” has been featured in numerous films, such as Frankenweenie and Edward Scissorhands. Although, the characters in today’s pop culture and the monster in the well-known 1800’s novel have similarities, they are actually very different. The many similarities and differences range from the character’s physical traits and psychological traits, the character’s persona, and the character’s place in the Gothic style.
Frankenstein and Paradise Lost Striking similarities between a duo of novels are not unusual. The novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelly, deals with a scientist named Victor Frankenstein who embodies a creature, who eventually wreaks havoc on his life. The novel Lost Paradise, by John Milton, exposes the cruelty of Christianity or the Christian God within the characters God, Satan, Adam, and Eve. Victor Frankenstein and God have many similarities, as they are both creators of incarnations. Victor's creature, known as the monster, shows striking similarities with Satan and Adam.
The novel Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley is a work of fiction that breaks the ethics of science. Ethics is defined as rules of conduct or moral principles which are ignored in the story. The story is about a person named Victor Frankenstein who creates an artificial being. Victor abandons the being out of fear and the being is left to discover the outside world on his own and be rejected by people making the monster go on a violent rampage. Victor’s decision would affect him later on by the monster killing his loved ones causing Victor to suffer. Then Victor chooses to seek revenge on the monster and this choice will bring him to his death. In novel Frankenstein one might say that the main character, Victor, breaks the ethics of science when he plays God by creating his own being.