Blacks In The North Dbq Analysis

510 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Dbq how free were free blacks in the north

“Free” blacks in the North were not really free. They didn’t have many freedoms at all. Blacks in the North faced a mixed bag of freedoms and restrictions, but the restrictions outnumbered the freedoms in three important areas of life, politics, social freedoms, and freedoms in economics/education. First, blacks in the North were somewhat free in the area of politics. Blacks could vote in all the New England states except Connecticut. This means that blacks in the North mostly had the freedom to vote. Blacks were only allowed to attend Jury Duty in Massachusetts. You also must have been male to vote or attend Jury Duty(Doc A). This shows that blacks in the North didn’t have much freedom to attend Jury Duty. There were churches for blacks to go to and worship their religion(Doc D) This shows that blacks had the freedom of religion. …show more content…

Blacks in the North were not allowed to “mingle” with whites. Document B says, “‘...he shall not...mingle with us in the concert-room, the lecture room, the theatre, or the church, or to marry with our daughters.”’ This shows that blacks in the North didn’t have the freedom to do things with whites. Document D states, “The Church was a place to become involved in community...It was a place to marry, and to be buried.” This show that blacks could go to a church for blacks and do things with other blacks and worship their religion. Whites treated blacks like blacks were inferior. Document B states, “‘We are of another race, and he is inferior. Let him know his place - and keep it.”’ This shows that whites thought of blacks as inferior or worse than

Show More
Related

  • Analysis of C. Van Woodward´s The Strange Career of Jim Crow

    737 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...id during slavery I might add, but this time they were free, had access to property, shopped where whites shopped, lived side by side. I say again in this review, location, location, location. The north had slaves, the south had slaves, and the north had segregation--first. This book reminds us as we romanticize the north it also has a past. I recommend this book to any teacher or person wanting to know the real history of segregation between blacks and whites in America and to remember history repeats itself. When you read this book, like me, you will see classism came into play, and the danger is when people lose jobs, quality of life, they look for someone to blame, thus we have the next book I've read called The New Jim Crow. I say this book like Martin Luther King said, is the bible of civil rights in America and a must read. Write on, write on C. Vann Woodward

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Reconstruction Era

    2078 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Mississippi Black Codes document of 1865 was presented to us by Walter L. Fleming, who was a historian who dealt with the south and more specifically the reconstruction era. He was targeting future historians who were studying this era. He nearly states the pros and cons of what the Mississippi Black Codes asked of their citizens. There were several things in the document that interested me in what history was at this time period. On the other hand, there were parts of the amendments to the government which I found very unethical with my present-day mindset. I realize such times were different, but it still made me sick to my stomach that “Freedmen, Free Negroes, and Mulattoes” were treated very differently than the ways such as whites were treated. The author breaks down the documents into different sections of the reconstruction plan. At first, he starts out talking about vagrant laws, which stated that the newly emancipated citizens had special laws that pertained to them. They were treated like animals that were forced to work if they did not have ownership of property. If they couldn’t hold down a job, on the second

    Read More

  • African Americans During Reconstruction Dbq

    496 Words  | 1 Pages

    Reconstruction(1865-1877) was the time period in which the US rebuilt after the Civil War. During this time, the question the rights of freed slaves in the United States were highly debated. Freedom, in my terms, is the privilege of doing as you please without restriction as long as it stays within the law. However, in this sense, black Americans during the Reconstruction period were not truly free despite Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. While legally free, black Americans were still viewed through the lens of racism and deeply-rooted social biases/stigmas that prevented them from exercising their legal rights as citizens of the United States. For example, black Americans were unable to wholly participate in the government as a

    Read More

  • How Free Were Free Blacks in the North?

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    Generally speaking, blacks in the north were somewhat free in the area of political and judicial rights. Most of the northern states in the year 1860 allowed or restricted voting. This might seem great, but, New England was the region that had the most states that black males could vote. Out of 221,000 blacks in the north, only 25,000 African-Americans lived in New England. Furthermore, only males were permitted to vote. Any women, regardless of race was prohibited from voting until many years after the Civil War. Five of the 16 northern states allowed restricted black male voting. Of 11,000 blacks in New York CIty only 100 could vote. The reason behind this is that you had to pay a $250 property requirement in order to vote. This kept most blacks in New York from voting. Jury Duty is also another activity that nearly no blacks could partake in. Out of the 16 northern states, Massachusetts was the only state in 1860 that allowed black males to serve in the jury. These limitations of freedoms are important because blacks got hardly any say in their government. A voice in the government is important for anyone is because anyone who lives there needs to also be taken into consideration when making or chang...

    Read More

  • Slavery: Northern v. Southern

    665 Words  | 2 Pages

    Free blacks from the south were facing many situations from the whites from the Jim Crow laws. The Jim Crow laws were to prevent free blacks and other non-whites from being able to vote and have a voice within the government. Laws and statements were established such as the Grandfather Clause, which would prevent anyone whose grandfather could not vote from voting. Since the majority of blacks grandfathers did not vote and was not even free, free blacks in the south were denied the right to vote. Free blacks were now being denied any privilege that non slaves (whites) already had. Their "freedom" was only from slavery, now they realized that they were still a slave to the world. Also during this time blacks were being discriminated against and the lynchings of blacks were occurring. Blacks were becoming endangered and feared for their lives.

    Read More

  • Freedom for African Americans in Democracy in the America by Alexis de Tocqueville

    1428 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is easiest to believe that free blacks experienced the most freedom in commerce. In the South free blacks were most likely to work as farmers. Those who could not afford their own land worked on the fields of others. In North Carolina, for example, counties with large free black populations often saw free blacks working on large plantations. There they worked as field hands, drivers, and all around laborers. This was perhaps the easier type of work for a free black to obtain simply because it was no different from the work of a slave. It was menial labor which provided no social mobility for free blacks. As for those who did own land, much mo...

    Read More

  • The Strange Career of Jim Crow

    1332 Words  | 3 Pages

    C. Vann Woodward’s The Strange Career of Jim Crow looks into the emergence of the Jim Crow laws beginning with the Reconstruction era and following through the Civil Rights Movement. Woodward contends that Jim Crow laws were not a part of the Reconstruction or the following years, and that most Jim Crow laws were in place in the North at that particular time. In the South, immediately after the end of slavery, most white southerners, especially the upper classes, were used to the presence and proximity of African Americans. House slaves were often treated well, almost like part of the family, or a favored pet, and many upper-class southern children were raised with the help of a ‘mammy’ or black nursery- maid. The races often mixed in the demi- monde, and the cohabitation of white men and black women were far from uncommon, and some areas even had spe...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast A Lesson Before Dying

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    Segregation is the act of setting someone apart from other people mainly between the different racial groups without there being a good reason. The African American’s had different privileges than the white people had. They had to do many of their daily activities separated from the white people. In A Lesson Before Dying there were many examples of segregation including that the African American’s had a different courthouse, jail, church, movie theater, Catholic and public school, department stores, bank, dentist, and doctor than the white people. The African American’s stayed downtown and the white people remained uptown. The white people also had nicer and newer building and attractions than the African American’s did. They had newer books and learning tools compared to the African American’s that had books that were falling apart and missing pages and limited amount of supplies for their students. The African American’s were treated as if they were lesser than the white people and they had to hold doors and let them go ahead of them to show that they knew that they were not equal to them and did not have the same rights or privileges as they did just because of their race. In A Narrative of the Life of Fredrick Douglass segregation is shown through both slavery and the free African American’s during this time. It showed that the African American’s were separated from the white people and not

    Read More

  • Jim Crow Era: A Nightmare of Racial Discrimination

    2275 Words  | 5 Pages

    The social conditions throughout the era were extremely poor. Legal discrimination was around and African Americans were denied democratic rights and freedoms. The southern states would pass strict laws to normalize interactions between white people and African Americans. For example, Jim Crow signs were placed above regularly visited places by everyone, such as water fountains, public facilities, door entrances and exits, etc. Even the most basic rights such as drinking from a water fountain was taken away from African Americans. They would also have separate buildings for African

    Read More

  • Historical Methodology

    2024 Words  | 5 Pages

    From the beginning of the book, Woodward argues that prior to Jim Crow, segregation in the Southern states was not as strong as many assume. To support this claim he cites Slavery in the Cities, where author Richard C. Wade provides evidence for segregation while at the same time states that, “‘In every city in Dixie…blacks and whites lived side by side, sharing the same premises if not equal facilities and living constantly in each other’s presence.’”[1] In the rural areas during slavery, African Americans and whites also had a large amount of social interaction, because, as Woodward explains, “control was best maintained by a large degree of physical contact and association.”[2]

    Read More

  • Dbq Essay On The Abolition Of Slavery

    683 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his paragraph he writes, “ We shall not make the black man a slave; we shall not buy him nor sell him; but we shall not associate with him.”, (Doc B). This shows that they didn’t see black males as slaves and aren’t allow to buy or sell them. They allow black males to live a free life and to pay taxes and perform their duties. When charles mentions “ We” he means the white americans. The racial attitudes I can infer when reading his paragraph is that the white americans don’t want to dine nor talk to black males. They won’t allow them to do jury duty. This document shows that there were still racial issues even though slaves in the north were

    Read More

  • Free Blacks compared to Slaves

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    Blacks in the north were separated from their white counterparts in everyway. Legislators were always creating laws to keep the races divided. Many states tried to impose laws that would segregate schools. The whites did not want black kids going to the same school because if blacks and whites mingled there could be inter marriage. Even the trains were segregated. Negroes had to sit on a certain part of the streetcars and whites on another. Blacks were not allowed to go to certain cities because people thought that they brought down the property value. Imagine people thought just the presence of blacks could bring down property value down.

    Read More

  • Compromise of 1877

    2202 Words  | 5 Pages

    There are certain historical facts, which have been lost in the public memory, as certain legends have taken the place of reality. In order to fully understand what happened, it is necessary to comprehend that the Northern states were far from being uniformly the champions of equal rights that is generally indicated by popular belief. By this understanding, that is that the abandonment of African-Americans did not constitute a drastic change of moral position for many people in the North, it is easier to understand their subsequent actions in ignoring the plight of African-Americans in the South after the Reconstruction era.5

    Read More

  • Black Status: Post Civil War America

    1111 Words  | 3 Pages

    Even with this government legislation, the newly dubbed 'freedmen' were still discriminated against by most people and, ironically, they were soon to be restricted and segregated once again under government rulings in important court cases of the era. Reconstruction was intended to give African-Americans the chance for a new and better life. Many of them stayed with their old masters after being freed, while others left in search of opportunity through education as well as land ownership. However, this was not exactly an easy task. There were many things standing in their way, chiefly white supremacists and the laws and restrictions they placed upon African-Americans.

    Read More

  • The Long Struggle for Civil Rights

    2179 Words  | 5 Pages

    All African Americans thought with the creation of civil rights, they would be free to do what all Americans could do. In the context of civil rights, emancipation means to be free from slavery. The process took much longer than they expected. Many fled to the North to gain their freedom, which was rightfully theirs. Legal slavery was removed from the North, but the population of slaves between the first emancipation and the end of the Civil war doubled, from roughly 1.8 million in 1827 to over four million in 1865. It was very difficult for southern farmers and those who owned slaves to immediately give up a lifestyle they were accustomed to and remove their slaves. White southerners viewed African Americans as their workers. They have lived with this mindset for so long, causing their transition to be challenging compared to the transition of the slaves in the north.

    Read More

More about Blacks In The North Dbq Analysis

Open Document