Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of bipedalism in human evolution
Essay on evolution of bipedalism
Importance of bipedalism in human evolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of bipedalism in human evolution
It has long been believed that humankind owes its survival to bipedalism, which is the ability to walk on two legs. This is the first human characteristic to distinguish human from other primates. It is habitual, meaning that it is the primary form of transportation. This characteristic thrived in a time where forests were shrinking and the environment consisted of grasslands. The feature bipedal locomotion leads humans to manipulate their surroundings, bypassing their biological features and being given to the ability to live anywhere, and in any environment. Although developing into bipedal organisms hominids were taking a big gamble. With all the benefits of bipedalism, there are also many disadvantages. In some cases these disadvantages …show more content…
have caused a set-back for humans, even causing many deaths. Was this human characteristic a failure of natural selection?
And would a human has better benefited if their early ancestors followed the way of the modern chimp and stayed quadrupedal. Bipedalism, as an evolutionary advancement, poses new advantages and disadvantages to the survival of mankind.
The greatest benefit to bipedalism is that it leaves the hands open to carry “objects such as food, tools, offspring, and weapons” (Jablonski and Chaplin 113). This is quite prominent considering advances in tool-making and weaponry gave hominids an advantage over other predators that just depended on their own body to hunt. This is an advantage, because when it come to certain tasks humans can invent a new tool that is better suited to accomplish that task. For example, if a predator was ripping meat off the bones of its prey it wouldn't be able to successfully remove all the meat from the animal. A human, with the use of their tools, can
…show more content…
effectively remove more meat from the animal; they could also remove other parts of the animal that would be useful to them, such as the bones or hide that would also be beneficial for their survival. Having their hands free would also allow them to carry and feed young children. This is essential as other “primates are highly developed at birth, [while] human babies are born helpless” (Roberts and Thorpe 283). This child’s helplessness is combated by the mothers beneficial ability to be able to carry her child, feed it, and still be able to move around. Hands could also be left free in order to exchange social communication, such as hugging or patting each other on the back (Jablonski and Chaplin 116). Communication through body language was key in a time that could have lacked verbal communication. Body language as the main source of communication it is fair to say that this could have been used in constructing social group. It brought people together, and by living in small bands and tribes hominids increased their chance of survival, as now they had multiple people gathering food and protecting each other. Hominids populations resided in areas which were “composed largely of open wooded grassland” with “food and water resources [that] were not evenly distributed” (Jablonski and Chaplin 116). One beneficial adaptation of bipedalism is the locking knee. Having the feature of a locking knee meant that less energy was used when moving from place to place, allowing hominids to travel longer distances (Bill 2016). This allowed for a greater chance of survival, instead of hunting, hominids were able to follow an animal until it tired out, in order to kill and eat it, or walk further distances for water and better living conditions. Another benefit of the locking knee is that it put less stress on the joints (Bill 2016). This meant that walking around for a longer period of time wasn't as painful as it would be for other species who didn’t possess this feature. With resources being so scarce and spread out, there was increased competition between primates. Bipedalism appeared more frequently in “pre-hominids… then they did in other hominid lineages”, therefore, it was used as a “dominance appeasement” (Jablonski and Chaplin 116). This was extremely important as it allowed hominids to settle problems within groups in a peaceful way, instead of using aggression and violence. Ergo, bipedalism was used as a mechanism to settle “dominance between group members of both sexes over food and water that would have occurred in high frequencies in an open environment” (Jablonski and Chaplin 116). By resolving problems in a constructive way, it became more ritualized and less likely for a member of the group to get hurt in the process. This is in contrast to great African apes, who had a high mortality rate due to inter-group conflicts (Jablonski and Chaplin 117). This ability to be able to resolve conflicts in a ritualized, peaceful manner allowed for a succession of hominids over other primates and allowed more of them to be alive to gather resources. Bipedalism also advanced the hominids thermoregulation system, by minimizing the body’s contact with sun rays. This caused a huge advantage when walking through the savannah heat. In fact, experts have argued that in conditions like the savannah where “solar radiation [is] high and there is a high risk of hyperthermia and where there may have been a need to collect food constantly, from sunrise to sunset” (Jablonski and Chaplin 114). By walking bipedally exposure to sunlight would be limited to the top of the head. This would create a shield to the rest of the body. Keeping the body away from a direct heat source would allow the rest of the body to be exposed to the cool winds and breezes. This allows them to keep the overall temperature of the body comfortable enough to be able to gather food the entire day giving them an advantage over quadrupedal primates, who suffered in extreme heat on the savanna. With many advantages that aided in the evolution of hominids, bipolarism also caused disadvantages by decreasing their speed. Hominids had “significantly larger legs in relation to its body” (Aiello and Wells 331). Quadrupedal animals, who had shorter legs, also had more limbs helping them move. When moving short distances quadrupedal animals could move faster. It was seen that “at maximum running speed, human bipedalism is twice as expensive energetically than estimated for a quadrupedal mammal of the same body mass (Aiello and Wells 332). The posed a benefit for quadrupedal animals when it came to hunting. Quadrupedal animals that possessed this speed could chase and capture their prey. Hominids would have most likely gotten to the animal after the quadrupedal animal had already killed it and eaten part of its meat. Lastly, the biggest disadvantage that bipedal hominids, compared to other primates can be seen when looking at childbirth.
Human babies are helpless at birth compared to other primates and depend on their mother for a long duration of time. This is because they are born at an earlier “stage of neurological and cognitive development,” a result of having only 30% the brain size at birth compared to Chimpanzees with 40% (Roberts and Thorpe 283). The pelvis of a bipedal walker does not allow for the birth canal to be wide enough for a bigger brained baby to go through. Later humans have gone through adoption such as “absolute increase in coronal width, and a relative increase in sagittal depth” in order to give birth to big-brained babies (Roberts and Thorpe 284). This would have been big problems for early hominids as it would mean that giving birth to a baby would be a lot harder because of this compared to other primates with a larger birth canal. Without proper help the rate of both mother and child dying at birth was high. Also, because the child was so dependent on the mother in created a handicap for her, she herself would need some sort of extra protection from another hominid. This can be thought to be essentially early forming of a basic family unit. Finally, anything was to happen to the mother, the chances of the baby surviving on its one would be little to none. Unless another member of the community was to take over and care for the
child. It is fair to say that the sacrifices were high for all the benefits that came with bipedalism.Bipedalism decreased the speed of hominids, created inconveniences in hunting and being hunted, and negatively affected child birth. However, bipedalism allowed for hominids to be able to survive in the heat of the African savannah. If they had continued walking quadrupedally while not having the shield of shaded forested landscapes; they risked the chance of dying from hyperthermia or dehydration. By being able to travel around at a time when the sun was at it hottest they were able to gather more food. This gave them an advantage over other primates that would have to wait until the later afternoon before searching for food. Travel longer distances without getting tired, allowed them to travel to different environments, at some point even leaving Africa, to improve their standard of living. Bipedalism allowed for technological advancements, which allowed for proper tools to be able to hunt animals for their meat. This meat fed their brains, and this resulted in bigger brains that developed more complex and intricate thoughts. The complex thoughts eventually transformed into the lives that humans live today. A human can now virtually live and survive anywhere on planet earth and even space. It is safe to say that all the advantages of bipedalism far outweigh the disadvantages, therefore, bipedalism is a huge win for natural selection and mankind.
Lucy was bipedal and her brain was smaller than that of modern humans. Lucy resembled an ape and was able to make tools to find food and weapons.
The evolution of man is constantly in question. While we are reasonably sure that modern humans and primates are both related to the same common ancestor, there is constant debate over what initially caused the two species to split into early hominids and apes. According to some, our longest and most popular theory on the division of man and ape is profoundly wrong. However, those same individuals usually offer an equally controversial theory as a substitute, one that is almost impossible to scientifically test or prove. Both the Savanna Theory and the Aquatic Ape Theory offer solutions to how and why humans evolved into bipedal toolmakers. But with enough questioning, each loses its accountability to rhetorical science.
Pregnancy and the birth of a child throughout many cultures is viewed as a gift, either from God or from any other supernatural figure that they worship. If the pregnancy is terminated for any reason or there are complications it is also viewed in a large group of cultures as a punishment, or because you did not closely follow the rules or regulations of your culture. The process, emotional, and physical stress of bearing a child places mothers and family in a position of opportunity along with placing within them great responsibility. Mothers planning to bear children ideally need to be within the healthy weight range along with being well nourished, but this is not always the case. Many mothers to be are surprised when they realize or are
If Shipman is correct and humans evolved from animals that were primarily scavengers, previous explanations for human evolution would have to reviewed and compared to the new evidence. Current understanding of the development of bipedalism as an evolutionary advantage would change. Standing upright would be considered an advantage to finding carcases for scavaging, instead of a predatory reason. This small change in our understanding of human ancestors, would change how human understand themselves. Shipman uses tool and teeth marks on bone and early hominid's physical biology to support her claims.
Hopkins, W. D., et al. "Handedness For Tool Use In Captive Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes): Sex Differences, Performance, Heritability And Comparison To The Wild." Behaviour 146.11 (2009): 1463. Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File. Web. 16 Apr. 2014.
Many factors could have played a part in the evolution to bipedalism. Some of these are adaptation to environment and the need to have free hands to handle tools and weapons. These factors were the basis of Charles Darwin's theory of the evolution of quadrupeds to bipeds. (Hawks). Advantages of bipedalism include the ability to see farther and wider distances because you can see from a higher vantage point; the ability to carry food, tools, and weapons; and more efficient movement.
There is great debate over the concept of primate evolution. Some research supports the idea that evolution occurred linearly as a continuum while other research supports the idea that fossils found to date should be separated into individual species. Through morphological, and geological evidence this paper explores this topic and provides concise arguments to further develop the understanding of human primate evolution.
The fibula is a leg bone located on the lateral side of the tibia, with which it is connected above and below. It is the smaller of the two bones, and the slenderest of all the long bones, and plays a significant role in stabilizing the ankle and supporting the muscles of the lower leg. The fibula is the smaller, non-weight bearing, of the two bones in the lower leg, while the tibia is the larger, weight bearing bone. The fibula and tibia moves very little relative to each other and the joints that it forms contribute significantly to the function of the lower leg. The joint it forms permit the fibula to adjust its position relative to the tibia, increasing the range of motion of the ankle. Fibular fractures are not often a severe injury, because the bone is supports only about 17% of the body weight.
Bipedalism is anatomically important because it now demonstrates to us modern day humans the cycle of how we came to be. This skill was vital to human evolution because it differentiates early hominins from apes. By being able to walk further distances, they brought them to a diverse new diet that enabled their brains to get bigger. Bipedal animals usually walk greater distances because less energy is needed with their longer strides. The stone stools show evidence of abstract thinking and it shows the early hominins adapting and using their environment to survive, which is a skill that we as modern humans have surpassed.
“The scientific study of how humans developed did not begin until the 1800s in Europe. Until that time, people relied on religious explanations of how humans came into existence. Starting in the 1500s a scientific revolution began to sweep Europe. Thinkers started using scientific methods and experiments to try to better understand the world and the creatures living in it. Eventually these methods were turned to the question of human origins” (The Nature Of Human Origins, 1). Earth made it possible for species to change over time because Ancient Earth provides ability to plenty of time.The Homo Sapien a is very complex creature. The species started off very simple by living in caves and surviving with little food and then later evolved into a species that were able to do many more complex things. The first species was Sahelanthropus tchadensis They were one of the most simple humans in that time period and on. They had very small skulls compared to Homo Sapiens today and their motor skills were just the same. We have evolved and changed for the better both mentally and physically. The Evolution of Homo Sapiens started off simple, such as the Neanderthals, and now we are the most advanced species to ever walk the planet so far.
Throughout the long winding road that is human evolution; many species have helped shape who we are today. There was the early Australopithecus africanus which began to walk bipedally-upright with two feet and the Homo habilis which drastically developed the construction of handmade tools. But there is one species who is to be credited for the most critical advancements in human evolution; Homo erectus. Not only did Homo erectus advance us the most biologically, but also the most geographically.
The members of the Homo genus possess a combination of unique features that distinguish them from other related species. At the time that each respective species was alive, they were able to walk upright on two legs, use their large brains for the benefit of their species, and could thrive in many geographically and climatically diverse areas of the world. One of the most mysterious quandaries in science is how the lineage of the Homo genus became so different from their primate relatives. Bipedalism, brain size, and location diversity all have a common link that may explain this difference – dietary evolution allowed humans to adapt to their surroundings, and in turn, become a more advanced species. The Homo diet evolved in relation to food availability and nutritional necessity. With the ability to maintain a proper diet, the species of the Homo genus were able to flourish and advance toward the development of modern Homo sapiens.
Berger, K. S. (1980). 4: Prenatal Development and Birth. The developing person (pp. 93-121). New York, N.Y.: Worth Publishers.
One of the most important and pivotal physical and biological adaptations that separate humans from other mammals is habitual bipedalism. According to Darwin, as restated by Daniel Lieberman, “It was bipedalism rather than big brains, language, or tool use that first set th...
outcome of their health and ability. I remember giving birth to a child for the first time. I was afraid as