Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British colonialism in Australia
British colonialism in Australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British colonialism in Australia
Subheading of Collated Information Notes Billy Hughes: - William Morris (Billy) Hughes born on the 25th September, 1862, Pimlico, London. - Prime Minister Andrew Fisher, on 27th October 1915, resigned from his position and the role was passed on to the Deputy Prime Minister William Hughes- after he was elected by the Labor group. - Hughes held Prime ministership of Australia for seven and a quarter years, from 1915-1923, one year prior and five years following World War One - Hughes held Prime ministership of Australia for seven and a quarter years, from 1915-1923, one year prior and five years following World War One - Member of the House of Representatives from 1901-1952 (until death). During this time, he was associated with six different …show more content…
However, once news on the casualties and devastation of war reached the people, support dropped suddenly. - Men weren’t so easy to persuade now, campaigning for the recruitment of Australian men intensified via posters and speeches directed at men eligible (21+ men unlisted were called ‘shirkers’ or ‘traitors’). By 1916, there was a shortage of men. - 1916- Britain pressured Australia into contributing more to the war effort after heavy casualties in the Western Front- currently at 5500 men per month to maintain its forces overseas at operational level-, and after P.M. Hughes visited the war front he returns convinced that in order to win the war conscription in foreign territories must be implemented (Defence Act of 1903 enabled the government to conscript men but only to fight in defence of the Australian mainland). - Taking quickly to his newfound purpose, Billy brought it to the Federal Parliament. To introduce conscription, Parliament has to have a majority vote in the House of Reps. and Senate, but the Australian Labor Party’s (Hughes’ own political party) policy was against this & majority of Senators also were against …show more content…
During this time, the country was referred to as ‘White Australia’- the bulk of the population where of European descent and consisted very little of foreign minorities (remnants of the mass immigration from the Gold Rush). - Australia was posed with their first major problem as a federated nation: WWI. Although the population consisted of mainly ‘white Australians’, they were conflicted in their desired relationship with the British. Some believed that Australia should be its own nation, their own society, and especially not forced to lay down their life because another nation said so. Others were willing to serve their, in essence, masters, and to fight with their English brethren. - This newly-born country had taken one of the many steps to independence when the polls of both indicated that a slightly larger majority of Australia would not like to implement conscription in overseas territories. - Aus. history of WWI was to be remembered as a time of conflict, both mentally and physically, where we held our values close in the darkest of times. • Development of an Australian identity – sense of ourselves, acceptance of different groups, our place in the world etc. as a result of this
The Australian infantry moved to France in 1916 and to continue reporting the engagements involving the Australian Troops Charles went with them.
Later on in his developing career, Currie met with a woman named Lucy Charworth-Musters, who would one day be his wife. With a paying job as a teacher, he decided to enlist in the militia as a lowly gunner in the 5th Regiment at the Canadian Garrison Artillery. In 1901, Currie married Lucy and found a better-paying job at an insurance firm at Matson and Coles (Dancocks, 1985). With great devotion to his wife and two children, the militia was still one of Currie’s priorities and he became a commander of the 5th Regiment of Artillery, winning the Governor-General’s Cup for efficiency (Hyatt, 1987). On the 4th of August in 1914, the British ultimatum to Germany expired and Canada was now automatically at war (Hyatt, 1987).
Nevertheless, upon return to civilian life, many found they were treated with the same or harsher prejudice and discrimination as before. Fighting in another country in a war that does not affect them and completely against their culture and moral beliefs. It seems that the effects and the Aboriginal contribution of WW1 had a negative effect when they came back home and this was still evident at the start of WW2. When the war began in 1914, many Indigenous Australians tried to enlist but were rejected on the fact of their colour and race, but some simply snuck through. By October 1917, when recruits were rare and one conscription referendum had already failed, restrictions were eased back. A new Military Order stated: "Half-castes may be enlisted in the Australian Imperial Force provided that the examining Medical Officers are satisfied that one of the parents is of European origin." (Peter Londey, 2013). The repression of Indigenous Australians increased between the wars and protection acts gave government officials greater authority over Indigenous Australians. Australian Aboriginals had a positive contribution in World War One but this in turn had a negative effect on their culture and the way they were
Prime Minister Robert Menzies was a believer in the need for ‘great and powerful friends’ and the idea of ‘forward defence’. Before the 1949 federal election, Menzies campaigned on the representation of the Labor Party as out of touch with Australia’s postwar ambitions. He was aided by Chifley’s willpower to cover union wage stresses and control increase. Predominantly injuring for Labor was a Communist-led coal strike in New South Wales, and the government’s practice of troops to
In 1914, Australia joined the First World War. Although it was seen as a European war, the Australia government decided that Australia should support its 'Mother Country', Britain. The prime-minister at the time, Joseph Cook, stated Australia's position : "Whatever happens, Australia is a part of the Empire, right to the full. When the Empire is at war, Australia is at war." Many Australians objected to the country's involvement in the war, but the majority of the population agreed with the government's decision. Australia joined the war for many reasons, but two main reasons were :
The men rushed to enlist. In the first two weeks 7000 Victorian men volunteered for the first Australian Imperial Force (AIF) and 10,000 in Sydney.” It was a man’s duty to go to war. Most people who lived in Australia felt an obligation to England. England was at war, so Australians wanted to go and help them.
The introduction of conscription into Australia during the Vietnam War, caused much outrage in the Australian public. Vietnam was the first war ever to be properly televised, the public saw for the first time the true brutality of war. The public started to question Australia’s involvement in the war. Moratoriums were held around Australia in protest against conscription and Australia’s involvement in the war. Much of the protesting was done by students and the younger generations, there was still support for the war effort. This was reflected in the November 1966 elections, when there was a landslide victory for the Liberals. Conscription did have an effect on the Liberal governments popularity, a few months after a complete troop withdrawal in 1972 from Vietnam, the Whitlam Labour government replaced the McMahon Liberal government. Historically, one of the influencing factors of the Liberal’s election loss was the Governments choice to get involved in a war that had little to do with Australia.
In World War 1 (WW1), 1914-1918, Australian troops became involved in order to give support to the "Mother Country". Great Britain only became involved after Germany did not respect the neutrality of Belgium. In the first world war, Australian soldiers participated in some of the bloodiest and most enduring battles known to man, and soon developed a courageous name for themselves. Of the 330 000 Aussie soldiers who took part in WW1, there were 211 500 casualties and over 60 000 deaths, a casualty rate much higher than that of several other participants.
Australia's involvement in WWI was because Britain needed Australians to be soldiers and fight for the common wealthy countries. Because Britain was the "Mother country" and Australia was part of the common wealth and the British Empire, so Australia had a duty to go and help them out. Also because Australia wanted the war to be over quicker so that Japan doesn't attack Australia and if it does we knew that Britain had our backs. Australia still showed a lot of loyally to Britain and some of the solders considered that Britain as their home. The Gallipoli campaign resulted in the deaths of 7,600 Australians and 2,500 New Zealanders and the wounding of 19,000 Australians and 5,000 New
The unfairness of a system, which conscripted young men into a war when they were unable to have a political voice as to whether to go to war at all, contributed to the radicalisation of the New Left. The focus then spread to the societal issues of discrimination, imperialism and injustice especially in relation to race, women, sexuality. They challenged the white male dominated hegemony in Australia using techniques and rhetoric that had been adapted from similar movements in the United States and
-By 1880, many young Australian-born colonists were proud and spoke very proudly of themselves because they were ‘Australian’.
This became an issue for the Australian Government, who realised that they would eventually need more support on the front lines. A divisive public appeal began by the Australian Government led by Prime Minister Hughes to allow Conscription. “Billy Hughes decided to take the issue to the people in a referendum,” (Australian War Memorial, 2016,) to see if they should compel Australian men to serve in the war. At this time many forms of campaigning were made including the 1916 Conscription Badge “This is a pro-conscription badge for the campaign leading up to the vote and it says ‘Yes, for Australia and the Anzacs.” (Brown, 2007.) The referendum was acted upon on 28th October, 1916. Hughes asked the people of Australia during this time whether the government should have compulsory power over citizens in regard to requiring them for military. “The people of Australia are about to decide the destiny of their country. They must declare that they stand loyally by the Empire and their kinsmen. I ask them to prove in this referendum whether they want to be their own masters, or slaves.” (Museum of Australian Democracy, 2016.) Many people at the time disproved this statement as they wanted to make their own decisions. The First Referendum on Conscription was “narrowly defeated” with 51% voting against Conscription. As a result of this Hughes was expelled from his
The Australian conscription propaganda caused a hugely negative view of the Germans and a view to idealise the Australian troops
Loyalty and patriotism are what drove some of my mates to enlist to serve Australia. But for me, I saw it as a chance to prove the indigenous and Europeans are equal and maybe one day we can be treated equally. But what I did find after the war was that discrimination remained.
The WW1 Conscription is one of the significant PR events that occurred in Australia in the 20th century. The Government in essence intended to adopt a conscription policy so as to enhance its fighting capacity. Nevertheless it could not impose this policy unless it received the support of the Nation and therefore it had to persuade its citizen to support it by voting in the referendum. It however faced a very strong opposition with both parties adopting various public relation strategies to influence the public perception towards conscription. The Government lost in both referendums implying that its PR campaigns were not as effective as those of the opposition. The opposition therefore can still rely on the PR strategy it had applied during WW1 conscription to block any attempts by the Government to reintroduce conscription. However, the new campaign should utilize modern media and PR strategies so as to persuade effectively the current sophisticated audience (Sheehan 2007).