As long as the law permits that Mr. B can ask his physician to assist him to terminate his life, then he can legally be able to do so. The Bill C-14, a law on MAID in Canada, provides a constitutional rights to individuals to ask an assistance from their physicians or Nurse Practitioner (NP) to terminate their lives as long as they meet the criteria as stated under the law. But, the law also mention that health-care providers can choose whether or not they would like to participate in implementing MAID. This does not mean, however, that the physician can just abandon the wish of Mr. B if the physician is not in favor to it. Ms. N might need to work with the physician to clarify the decision of Mr. B and to explore other possible options that …show more content…
Mr. B may choose from. Aside from seeking MAID, Mr. B might also consider attending a counselling therapy, joining support group for the bereaved, be referred to palliative care, find another physician or NP who can assist him to achieve his goal. Counselling therapy might assist Mr.
B to vent out his feelings on his situation. Since Mr. B just recently lost his wife, it can be possible that he is still mourning on it. By providing him an environment where he can freely express his feelings, Ms. N might be able to understand his motivation and perspectives. The risk, however, is that if the therapy would make Mr. B more frustrated on his situation. Related to counselling therapy is group therapy wherein Mr. B meets individuals who can relate to his experience. Allowing him to join group therapy might give him a realization that he is not alone experiencing pain and suffering. The risk can be that he is not really interested to navigate this option. Accessing a group therapy can also be a challenge if there it is not available to his neighborhood. Referring Mr. B to palliative treatment is another option. The relationship that he can be building while at the palliative therapy might give him another perspective in life. However, his economic and physical condition might limit him to gain access to palliative therapy. Provided that he also needs to settle his own bills regularly, he might have limited financial capabilities to sustain his palliative treatment as well as in meeting any support
groups. Other health-care providers might be thinking that it is best for Mr. B to continue fighting for his life until to the very end. His close friends and community can also be thinking similarly. By continuously having a follow-up with his physician, he can have enough medications to relieve his pain temporarily. On the other hand, it can possibly escalate his frustration of being unsupported towards his desired outcome. He might gradually withdraw from seeking care, or might commit suicide if he feels ending his life is the only solution to preserve his dignity and to be relieved from suffering The nurse need to explore all the possible options with Mr. B. Ms N needs to consider his personal, socio-economic, spiritual, and cultural factors while working with Mr. B in clarifying his decisions to have MAID.
While her therapist helps her with her father, the therapist unintentionally improves her relationship with her husband. At Southeastern Louisiana University’s common read, Smith explains, “I think I was able to meet him [her husband] because I cleared up a lot of silly stuff through therapy” (Smith). This confirmation allows the reader to receive a higher understanding of the effect therapy impacted Tracy K. Smith.
Terminally ill patients no longer wish to have their lives artificially prolonged by expensive, painful, or debilitating treatments and would rather die quietly. The patients do not wish to prolong their life and they may not wish to commit suicide themselves or worse, are physically incapable of doing so. People have the right to their own destiny and living in the U.S we have acquired freedom. The patients Right to Self Determination Act gives the patient the power to decide how, when and why they choose to die. In "Editorial Exchange: Death with Dignity: Reopen Assisted-Suicide Debate." The Canadian Press Sep 27 2013 ProQuest. 7 June 2015” Doctor Donald Low and his terminally ill friends plea to physician assisted suicide in an online video. He states that it is their rights as cancer patients to make the decision to pass, but he is denied. Where is the equality? Patients who are on dialysis or hooked up to respirators have the choice to end their lives by ending treatment. However, patients who are not dependent on life support cannot choose when they can pass. Many patients feel that because of their illness that life is not worth living for and that life has already been taken from them due to lack of activities they can perform. Most of the terminally ill patients are bedridden with outrageous amounts of medication and they don’t want family members having to care for them
Physicians are not forced to participate in the assisted suicide, but allowing for a second party to be included in a death only causes complications. The ones who do choose to participate in the procedure open the potential for abuse. A person who is sick, elderly, or disabled may be taken advantage of by their doctor, especially if they are not in the right mind set to make a rational decision. The law is designed to only allow the qualified to go through physician assisted suicide, but there is also the chance that doctors can give the person a procedure without it being requested or it being a final decision. Preventions against this chance are not ensured. There have been hundreds of ignored cases that show the abuse of power at the hands of the physician. It is nearly impossible at this point to decipher between an assisted suicide and a medical murder. The many flaws in the design of this system can cause the problems for those involved to outweigh the benefits.
... be shown that we care about him and want to provide stability in his life. It’s importance for a therapist to share things about themselves and give their honest opinion in order to make the patient comfortable and trusting of them. (Comer, 2011, p. 43)
First, it is not lawful. According to Canadian law it is a crime. For instance, the criminal code section #241 part b) states that anyone who assists in suicide whether complete or incomplete is guilty for indictable offense, resulting in 14 years of imprisonment. It is also not permitted by the Canadian Medical Association. For example the Canadian Medical Association policy specifically states that “Canadian physicians should not participate in euthanasia.” Furthermore, the physician should not cause death intentionally because it “is fundamentally incompatible with the physicians’ role as healer and caregiver.”Therefore, euthanasia is seen as a crime by two laws committees, national and medical.
It is important that patients and family members understand the conditions under which the patient is suffering from. People have an obligation of preparing themselves for end of live. This can be done by writing a will or an Advance Directive to guide the medical personnel and family members on what the patient wants. It can also be done by assigning a medical care proxy to decide on the patients behalf (Groopman and Hartzband, 2011). Medical personnel need to consider the patients wish and act as per the law when deciding on end-life options. Most of the decisions made by terminally ill patients are biased and compromised.
There are multiple structures of that can be applied to the counselling process, ranging from the basic idea of a beginning, middle and end to a more structured approach as that proposed by Egan (1994). Although his initial structure offered three main components; Stage 1, exploring the situation, stage 2, identifying a new or desired scenario to strive for and stage 3, the action stage, in which methods of coping are devised of and implemented. Egan later devised a ten stage structure that still takes into account initial stages from the speakers perspective of identifying a problem and seeking help, within this structure stage 4 is the initial meeting of the counsellor and client and can be considered the beginning stage of the helping re...
Irvin D. Yalom, author of the book The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, has vast knowledge and experience with group therapy and, in this book, imparted it to neophyte counselors in a logical and detailed format. The author carefully explained the therapeutic value of a group, the factors necessary to facilitate change, and the role of the therapist. The author emphasized the here-and-now focus, and how group members create a social microcosm of their life within the therapy group. Yalom advised on practical matters, like the selection of clients and the creation of the group. He then carefully explored the stages that groups move through and some problem members could encounter.
What is a physician's duty to a patient? Are doctors ever justified in ending a life entrusted to their care, even at the request of the patient or his family? These questions are being asked in today's society as part of the growing debate surrounding physician-assisted euthanasia (PAS). Several well-publicized cases in the past few decades have only fueled the fire, inspiring equally convicted individuals and organizations to rise up on both sides. Pro-life advocates argue the immorality of assisted suicide, and are, except for a few instances, supported by the law. Pro-choice supporters not only cite ethical justification, but argue the practical benefits and recent legislation legalizing of some instances of euthanasia in limited areas of the world. Despite certain economic benefits and legal support, it is never justifiable for a doctor to facilitate the death of any patient.
The above is our hospital's policy concerning end life care, which we hope to adopt. First and foremost, we believe that life is foundationally good, and unless we are given specific instructions through the aforementioned procedures, we will always try to sustain life. At our hospital we will also respect the moral beliefs of our doctors. At no time will a doctor be made to perform the PAS procedure, or end the life of another. If the doctor does not feel comfortable patients requests, they will be given the opportunity to make a lateral transfer, and give the case to a doctor with no moral qualms. In conclusion, it is only the prerogative of an individual to decide what is the best life for him or herself. We will always try to respect our patients beliefs, and carry out their respective wishes, as long as they fall in accordance to our guidelines.
To beginning with group therapy is a therapeutic intervention based on the exploration and Analysis of environmental and emotional conflicts happen in one's life. also it is meant to be an infected method 4 solving emotional and behavioral accidents of human interpersonal relationships. not to mention group therapy soap this is to help individuals develop satisfied in functional relationships with 1 or more persons it's a way to help people behave in a structure group in the goal is to diminish feelings of isolation. next group therapy is not a long-term resolution it is a short-term resolution or what it spected to be a short time resolution it's a sense of belonging is unique and his part of
Thus, despite the arguments against euthanasia, patients’ lives should not be deprived of well-being, comfort or dignity. “In the last stage of life, every person is entitled to a high standard of care and a stable environment in which his or her privacy is respected” (Policy Options, 2013). A lot of the time, patients with terminal illnesses are thought of as ‘better off dead’ or ‘not the person they used to be’. This is all the more the reason why euthanasia should be legalized in Canada. The government should relax current laws and allow doctors to participate in assisted suicide if need be and are willing. If people suffering with terminal illnesses want to die peacefully and not endure painful procedures or live off machines whilst also helping society out money wise, the option should be available.
He determines patient’s understanding of diagnosis and prognosis, along with treatment options (Orentlicher, Pope, & Rich, 2016). They are required to provide informed consent by discussing alternative end of life options. In addition, physicians encourage discussion with family members to determine what other factors may be driving the patient’s decision. Often times the patient desires help in approaching the topic and their decision with family and the physician aids the patient in to informing family of his decision to terminate life (Orentlicher, Pope, & Rich, 2016). With not only one but two physicians evaluating the patient and his competency to make such a decision, the law protects even the vulnerable of
Should a patient have the right to ask for a physician’s help to end his or her life? This question has raised great controversy for many years. The legalization of physician assisted suicide or active euthanasia is a complex issue and both sides have strong arguments. Supporters of active euthanasia often argue that active euthanasia is a good death, painless, quick, and ultimately is the patient’s choice. While it is understandable, though heart-rending, why a patient that is in severe pain and suffering that is incurable would choose euthanasia, it still does not outweigh the potential negative effects that the legalization of euthanasia may have. Active euthanasia should not be legalized because
Counselling is collaboration of steps that is aimed to help clients cope better and learn to deal with situations that they are facing. This includes teaching the client to focus on their thoughts and emotions, and to teach them to make positive choices and changes. It is a method for helping individuals to lessen primary anguish ensuing from a challenging situation and guaranteeing long-term constructive handling of stressful situations.