Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Laws understanding contracts
Laws understanding contracts
Laws understanding contracts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Laws understanding contracts
Every commercial enterprise in the US has to deal with contracts. A contract is legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties that creates an obligation to do or not do particular things. The term party can mean an individual person, a company, or corporation. Contracts are usually controlled and enforced by laws that vary depending upon the state it originates in. Many people will state its a contract or an agreement, but technically they are not the same thing. As a contract is a legally enforceable agreement in writing an agreement is what is consider to be a mutual understanding. A verbal contract can still have the legal force, but many have to be in the form of a written contract like long term contracts and contracts A bilateral contract is the types of agreement most people think of as a traditional contract. It is a mutual exchange of promises among parties. In a bilateral contract, each party may be considered as both making a promise, and being the beneficiary of a promise. A unilateral contract is one in which the offer requests performance rather then a promise from the person accepting the offer. A unilateral contract is formed when the requested act is complete. An example of this would be an advertisement for a reward, offering a discount of payment of money in exchange for something of value. An express contract is formed by explicit written or spoken language, expressing the agreement and its terms. The last form is an implied contract. This type is formed by behavior of the parties that clearly shows an intent to enter into an agreement, even if no obvious offer and/or acceptance were clearly stated in words or writing. Failure to perform under any of these types of contracts would be considered a “Breach” of Damages can fall under several different categories. Compensatory damage is directed to put the non-breaching party in the position that they had been if the breach had not occurred. Punitive damages are payments that the breaching party must submit for above and beyond the point that would fully compensate the non-breaching party. Punitive damages are meant to punish a wrongful party for particularly wrongful acts, and are rarely awarded in the business contracts environment. Nominal damages are token damages awarded when a breach occurred, but no money loss to the non-breaching party was proven. Liquidated damages are specific damages that were previously identified by the parties in the contract itself, in the event that the contract is breached. Liquidated damages should be a reasonable estimate of actual damages that might result from a
Whether oral or written, the contract must manifest a mutual intent to be bound expressed in a manner capable of being understood, and include a definite offer, unconditional acceptance and consideration.” (Express Contract 2016) The above definition is a much clearer explanation with key elements outlined; 1. mutual intent, 2, expressed in a manner capable of being understood, 3. definite offer, 4. unconditional acceptance and 5. Consideration.
If a breach of contract is both material and opportunistic, the injured promisee has a claim in restitution to the profit realized by the defaulting promisor as a result of the breach. Liability in restitution with disgorgement of profit is an alternative to liability for contract damages measured by injury to the promisee.
The difference between an express contract and an implied in fact contract is the manner in which assent is manifested.
Breach is where one party fails to carry the term in the contract. Therefore, the injured party is able to claim damages for loss due to breach of contract.
"A contract is a legally enforceable promise or set of promises. In other words, when promises have the status of contract, the contracting party harmed by a breach of the contract is entitled to obtain legal remedies against the breaching party" (Mallor et al., 2015, p. 320)
In the other hand, there is a formal kind of contract, which means that it is the opposite of the simple contract. Which is there are 2 kinds. Written and oral. It is the same as simple contract but it has prove that both side of the parties has agrees on whatever that they have agreed on. Why a lot of people choose to do formal contract rather than simple contract? It will comes up to the consequences if they breach the contract. They know the consequences that they will get if they ignore or not following the contract agreement. When that happen and end up at the court, they will found guilty because there is a written proof or sound proof that they have agreed. And because of that proof, if one of the parties broke them, that party will get the same consequences that they have agreed on before in the contract.
Agreement is a mutual understanding of two parties and willing to accept terms and conditions in order to form a legal contract (Penthony et al.2014). Agreement consists of two components; offer and acceptance. Offer is made by an offeror in an exchange for performance from another party on certain terms while acceptance is the action of accepting to the terms of the offer. An offer must follow the requirement in order to form
A unilateral NDA is where there are two parties and only one party anticipates disclosing information to the other party and requires that the information is secure from disclosure to other parties. This type of agreement is common in patent laws, trade secrets, and major announcements. A bilateral NDA is a two-way agreement where the two parties disclose information to each other and protect that information from being disclosed further. This used mainly in joint ventures or mergers. A multilateral NDA has three or more parties where at least one of them discloses information to the other parties and protects that information from being further disclosed. This eliminates the need for multiple unilateral or bilateral NDAs but can be more complex because all the parties involved would have to reach an
Unilateral – some offers are purely one sided, made without the offeror’s having any idea whether they will ever be taken up and accepted, and thereby be transformed into a contract. For example when an advertisement where a person is rewarding another one if he finds his pet (which was lost). In this case the person who is making such an offer is not sure whether this offer will be ever accepted.
One of the last remaining strongholds of classical contract law is the notion that contracts require offer and acceptance therefore, in order for a contract to become binding, offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations must exist. However contracts are formed in different ways for each different circumstance. (Shawn Bayern, Offer and Acceptance in Modern Contract Law: A Needles Concept, 103 Cal. L. Rev. 67, 102 (2015)
The express terms , that parties put down in the contract that is in writing and stated in the contract and cannot be ignored .
A contract is an agreement which has its specified terms and conditions between two or more parties in which there is a promise to do something in return for a benefit.
A contract is an agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to perform some actions in return of some consideration. These promises are legally binding. The contract can be for exchange of goods, services, property and so on. A contract can be oral as well as written and also it can be part oral and part written but it is useful to have written contract otherwise issues can be created in future. But both the written as well as oral contract is legally enforceable. Also if there is a breach of contract, there are certain remedies for that which are discussed later in the assignment. There are certain elements which need to be present in a contract. These elements are discussed in the detail in the assignment. (Clarke,
A valid contract is an agreement including promises made between two or more parties with an intention of certain legal rights and legal responsibility that are enforceable. For there to be a contract – that must contain four essential elements- offer, acceptance, intention to create legal relations and consideration.
A contract is generally considered to be an exchange of promises or an agreement between parties which in due course legally binds the parties; this can be enforced by the English Law. A contract is always, referred to the basic foundations of Contract Law, which refers to promises being kept amongst two parties. It is clear that all people make contracts nowadays and do not even consider for a moment that they are forming contracts; these can be formal or informal, oral or written.