Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of the bible today
Importance of the bible today
Importance of the bible today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of the bible today
I have been asked to present a reasoned explanation as to why one should have confidence in the authenticity, correctness, and relevance of the Bible. As part of this explanation, I am to present evidence that the Bible is genuine and not a forgery; that the Bible is accurate and not a myth; and that the Bible addresses modern man’s situation. I wish to be up front in stating that I feel the essay questions beg the question as to the Bible’s accuracy and authenticity, which I find distressing as a starting point for objective discussion. On the relevance of the Bible for modern human life and struggles, I am bit less uneasy.
First, I think it is necessary to properly define terms that will be used in this essay:
1. Forgery
In terms of the biblical witness, the word “forgery” should be understood as the word is commonly understood in contemporary culture. When most people see the word “forgery,” they automatically assume a negative connotation and the intention of deception on the part of the pseudonymous author.
…show more content…
For example, in I Timothy 4:7, the author writes, “Have nothing to do with godless myths and old wives’ tales; rather, train yourself to be godly.” It is clear that the author is referring to falsehood in this passage. But this is not the way modern sociologists understand the word.
Many modern biblical scholars and sociologists understand myth in an almost opposite way to the biblical writers. For these scholars, myth refers to something that may not be literally true, but which carries significant ethical or spiritual truth for those who incorporate those mythic stories into their daily understandings of how to act and live in the world. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion, by Sir James George Frazer, is perhaps the most well-known supporting this newish view of
This paper is written to discuss the many different ideas that have been discussed over the first half of Theology 104. This class went over many topics which gave me a much better understanding of Christianity, Jesus, and the Bible. I will be addressing two topics of which I feel are very important to Christianity. First, I will be focusing on the question did Jesus claim to be God? This is one of the biggest challenges of the Bibles that come up quite often. Secondly, I will focus on character development.
... by people or it was proven to be true over the years. In conclusion, it is widely believed that myth and religion are two different things. Religion involves an array of non-mythical elements including a moral code, a faith in a supreme being and dutifulness to the Church, but religion believes can be sometimes mistaken as myth because it a supernatural thing. Until now the Bible showed it is truly identity as a word of god in everything, and if there is anything in the Bible that is still unclear or not proved yet that dose not mean it is a myth, and does not mean there is a myth in the Bible because what is in the Bible is true. However, humans minds cannot understand the unlimited god with their limited minds, so they think what is in the Bible is a myth, but in fact the Bible has no myth because the Bible is the word of God, and everything is as it is written.
Myths relate to events, conditions, and deeds of gods or superhuman beings that are outside ordinary human life and yet basics to it” ("Myth," 2012). Mythology is said to have two particular meanings, “the corpus of myths, and the study of the myths, of a particular area: Amerindian mythology, Egyptian mythology, and so on as well as the study of myth itself” ("Mythology," 1993). In contrast, while the term myth can be used in a variety of academic settings, its main purpose is to analyze different cultures and their ways of thinking. Within the academic setting, a myth is known as a fact and over time has been changed through the many different views within a society as an effort to answer the questions of human existence. The word myth in an academic context is used as “ancient narratives that attempt to answer the enduring and fundamental human questions: How did the universe and the world come to be? How did we come to be here? Who are we? What are our proper, necessary, or inescapable roles as we relate to one another and to the world at large? What should our values be? How should we behave? How should we not behave? What are the consequences of behaving and not behaving in such ways” (Leonard, 2004 p.1)? My definition of a myth is a collection of false ideas put together to create
Myths have always played a part in society. They not only entertain the reader, but the mythological story also plays a major role in corroborative cultural beliefs. David Bidney writes “The function of a myth is thus held to be one of validating or justifying cultural beliefs and practices.” The mythical tale reiterates the moral practices and beliefs that a culture needs to succeed. A myth is a story, which can by written or spoken, that has four purposes for being told: it expresses humanity's fear of nature, it helps to explain the creation of the universe, it gives the reader moral guidelines that should be followed, and finally, it instructs the reader on how to cope with challenges that might arise during the day. Because the Old Testament offers stories that expresses explanations for mankind on dealing with crises, humanity's fear of nature, and moral guidance, they clearly fall into the category of a myth or mythological story.
Harris, Stephen. Understanding The Bible. 6 ed. New York City: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages, 2002. Print.
From the Webster’s dictionary the real meaning of the word myth is, “a story or legend” that was created as oral traditions that were told from generation to generation. Often as individuals told the stories, they were changed slightly in context or meaning. One cannot be certain, however, that historically based myths are not historically correct. Exaggeration due to personal vendetta was often the cause for discrepancies of factual or not factual information included in dialect from a mythical standpoint. An instance where this fact was the case is seen in the Old Testament. Even, the Old Testament can be looked upon as being mythical. From a religious perception, the Old Testament may be viewed as the history of Judaism and believed to be completely factual and true, but from a mythical standpoint that selection may be fictitious in context. Mythology suggests that due to the fact that events w...
Thomas, Keith. The. Religion and the Decline of Magic. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1971. Traister, Barbara Howard.
When considering the basis of the Bible, we need to take into account that there’s no other book in history that has been written by more than 40 different authors in a span of 1,500 years, and yet it all consistently tell the same story. In The Bible Among the Myths, Oswalt states, “If the historical basis on which the supposed revelation [the Bible] rested was false, then why should we give any special credence to the ideas resting on that basis” (p. 31). Therefore, in order to respond to this question, we need to tell what liberalism, rationalism, individualism, postmodernism, logic and science is not telling us. The fact is that if the Bible provenance is false, as a consequence, we could not trust the Bible as the “absolute word of God”. However, the Bible have been proven to be a trust wordy book; and validated by archeological scientific experiments and findings.
Tambiah, S. J. Magic, Science, Religion and the scope of Rationality (Cambridge University Press, 1990)
For centuries now Christians have claimed to possess the special revelation of an omnipotent, loving Deity who is sovereign over all of His creation. This special revelation is in written form and is what has come to be known as The Bible which consists of two books. The first book is the Hebrew Scriptures, written by prophets in a time that was before Christ, and the second book is the New Testament, which was written by Apostles and disciples of the risen Lord after His ascension. It is well documented that Christians in the context of the early first century were used to viewing a set of writings as being not only authoritative, but divinely inspired. The fact that there were certain books out in the public that were written by followers of Jesus and recognized as being just as authoritative as the Hebrew Scriptures was never under debate. The disagreement between some groups of Christians and Gnostics centered on which exact group of books were divinely inspired and which were not. The debate also took place over the way we can know for sure what God would have us include in a book of divinely inspired writings. This ultimately led to the formation of the Biblical canon in the next centuries. Some may ask, “Isn’t Jesus really the only thing that we can and should call God’s Word?” and “Isn’t the Bible just a man made collection of writings all centered on the same thing, Jesus Christ?” This paper summarizes some of the evidences for the Old and New Testament canon’s accuracy in choosing God breathed, authoritative writings and then reflects on the wide ranging
The historical reliability of the Bible is the first matter that needs to be discussed. There are three criteria that the military historian C. Sanders lists as principles for documentary historical proof: the bibliographical test, internal evidence test, and the external evidence test (McDowell 43). The bibliographical test is the examination of text from the documents that have reached us. The reliability of the copies of the New Testament is tested by the number of manuscripts (MSS) and the time intervals between the time in which the piece of literature was written and our earliest copy. There are more than 5,300 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament and 10,000 Latin vulgate manuscripts, not to mention the other various translations.
Chapter 1 Report Canonicity is absolutely crucial for the scripture found in the Holy Bible. There have been and still are many arguments about which books should be included in the Bible. Due to these constant disagreements, three tests were put in place to ensure canonicity. Three main factors were used to test whether or not a book was canon, and whether or not it should be included in the Bible: author, audience, and teaching.
In response to Oswalt’s statement that “if the historical basis on which the supposed revelation [the Bible] rested was false, then why should we give any special credence to the ideas resting on that basis”, people can trust in the Bible for it is theologically accurate despite some misunderstanding between it and some other historical record. Even though some of the details of the Bible were historically false, there are several reasons in defense of its theology reliability. First, the reason of copy and printing mistakes of Bible will be discussed. Then, the core features of the Scripture will be compared with myth. In the end, the combination will be concluded with the purpose and the process of the production of God’s Word.
Throughout time, one of the most commonly challenged topics has been that of Biblical authority. Individuals doubt the Bible’s inerrancy from a human perspective, clouded by sin; how can one trust that the Scriptures are constant in a world that is filled with change and error? Nonetheless, acquiring the answers to questions such as these provide individuals with an unshakable foundation for understanding Biblical theology. According to Elwell’s Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Authority refers to, “spoken or written words whose accuracy has been established and can be fully trusted” (Elwell).
The Bible is the only authority for Christian ethics – Discuss The Bible is a key source of knowledge for Christian ethics as, of course, the Bible itself holds all many teaching and principles from such authority’s as Jesus, although some may non-Christians argue that there are many criticisms to what the Bible has to teach, such as how the Bible is quite challenging of its own teachings and how depending on your own personal views both non biased Christians and non-religious people will create different interpretations of the Bible as a whole. And when looking at others views and principles of the Bible some may take it as relatively factually were as some may take it as more hidden messages and metaphors. Within this essay we will be comparing