More handpicked essays just for you.
Parenting styles in different cultures conclusion
Parenting styles across different cultures
Parenting styles in different cultures conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Benjamin Spock: Baby and Child Care Dr. Benjamin Spock, was a political activist and pediatrician. Mostly known for his publishing story in 1946, called “Baby and Child care.” As his ideas came in the following decades, many started to follow them, although he also had many people who dismissed his ideas. His message to parents was to not be afraid of using common sense, in which he stated "Don’t be afraid.…Take it easy, trust your own instincts…” With his book, Spock changed the attitudes of many parents and helped them find better ways to raise their infants and children. This theory to love your children and show affection rather than strict discipline was very rare in the 1940’s. Many parents were used to not showing
their affection toward their children for they believed it would make them weak and would not prepare them for the “real-world.” Spock also used Politics to be able to speak out on his concern for children. He believed children should be able to live in a healthy environment which included a place where they could breathe fresh air. Which led him to be a part of “SANE” where their priority was to stop nuclear bomb test, which affected the earth atmosphere. He believed that stopping these test would decrease air pollution which would help create a healthier environment. This theory is very important for teachers to use because it deals with the emotional side of children. When a student does something good and they get rewarded or complimented, it improves their self-esteem. Sometimes a child won’t do a certain task because of the fear they can’t do it or won’t do it correctly. If teachers are able to guide them and explain to them in a sweet manner that everything is ok, it would be so much easier for children to feel more confident in themselves. Spock also explained about disciplining children through words. This is good to use in the classroom environment, because it makes them understand that what they did was wrong. Using a less corporal approach, doesn't make them feel intimidated but instead gives them a theory that what they did was not correct, and they know not to do it again. However if a teacher uses a corporal punishment a child would either not participate for fear of thinking everything would result in punishment, make them feel like what they did was wrong and that they can never do anything right, or create more of a distraction to see if the teacher would react the same way repeatedly for the same reason. Lastly this theory will benefit the children, because like stated it will improve their confidence levels. When they know an adult is supporting them, they feel more energetic, and believe they can achieve anything, As a child, children learn through what they observe and hear, and if they hear positive words instead of negative ones, they will start believing in themselves and be encouraged to do positive things. Which in conclusion is what Spock wanted, he wanted adults to understand that love and affection go way more than strict punishment. For children get to feel freedom but at the same time understand that those who they look up too, believe and love them as much as they do.
Remember when children could walk down the street without having their parents with them? Maybe, you remember your dad sitting around the house on his off day in a dress shirt, slacks, and a tie? No? Neither do I, the reason we don’t remember this is because this took place back in the 1950’s, well before we were thought of. A time when siblings got along with one another, the mothers and fathers both had their own roles within the household, and neither of them shared tasks for the most part. People always seemed to use their manners, always dressed their best, and always seemed to want to be kind toward one another, within their households at least. As time has changed through the years, the changes through or within society has been the
Growing up, two group of people, parents, and grandparents, took the time and the energy to raise me. Both of them had different approaches when raising me. These approaches were different parenting styles. According to Baumrind, parenting style was the “[capturing] normal variations in parents’ attempts to control and socialize their children” (Darling, 1999). To put it simply, parenting style goal was to lecture, influence, and discipline a child. In general, there are four parenting styles with their own specific benefits and disadvantages. Furthermore, parenting style, granted the dynamic of the family was understood, can be identified in families.
In “Rods to Reasoning” Hays states that during the Middle Ages in Europe, if children were not “being fed, drugged, whipped, or tossed, they were often simple ignored (23). This was hardly the case in Industrial America. The view on children was changed from economically useful to emotionally priceless (Hays 32). When my grandmother and her family moved into the hotel, she believed she was fortunate enough to have the best childhood. She was seldom asked to help around the hotel and would often ask if there was anything she could do to help. Unlike the Puritan children who wanted to obey and please their parents so that they would be in good standing with their father to inherit land, children of the Industrial Era wanted to just please their parents to show their love and gratitude (Hays 31). Due to the new focus on childhood, a lot of literature about how to raise and treat a child was being published around this time. Rousseau declared that children would thrive when they were “treated with love and affection, and protected from the corruption of the larger society,” (qtd. in Hays 26). Protecting children from society and maintaining their innocence differed drastically from the Puritans who believed they had to break their children of their sinful nature (Hays 32). Growing up as my grandmother did, she passed down certain teachings and values to her children
The 1950s was a time when American life seemed to be in an ideal model for what family should be. People were portrayed as being happy and content with their lives by the meadia. Women and children were seen as being kind and courteous to the other members of society while when the day ended they were all there to support the man of the house. All of this was just a mirage for what was happening under the surface in the minds of everyone during that time as seen through the women, children, and men of this time struggled to fit into the mold that society had made for them.
These assumptions about the audience contribute to the logic of her claims only for her intended audience by making them feel specifically acknowledged. The author is then able to use statistics and refer to other sources or events that occurred in the 1980s without the audience questioning its credibility. This assumption makes readers such as myself believe that she was raised before parenting evolved; therefore, she cannot speak on behalf of the generations raised by these so called helicopter parents. If the reader had not had such thorough descriptions of the four shifts and how they contributed to the change in parenting and childhood, this assumption about her audience would not contribute, or possibly even decrease, the logic of her argument. The most recent generations would not know how parenting styles were before these shifts occurred. This assumption also would result in some of the audience questioning some of Haims’s warrants, such as the Race to the Top, and the importance of these references would be lost. Haims also implies that children were only told by their parents to go play outside, be kids, and be back by dinner before the parenting styles changed (Haims- Lynthcott). This implication, however, can be disproved by my experience growing up
Each member of the family was expected to fulfill certain roles, and to execute their obligations appropriately. When men came back from World War Two, they were forced to jump back into a normal lifestyle: working and raising a family. The father was the sole provider of the family, as he controlled the finances by working a steady job. After each day of work, the father would come home and find his role change from an intelligent businessman to a loving and caring husband. While the father was at work for the day, the mother was at home cooking, cleaning, and tending to the children. A small number of women worked part-time jobs with flexible hours, while still meeting the demands of daily housework, but rarely took the burden of working a full-time job. The mother’s main duty was to care for the children and provide for them. The children were raised to act in a respectful manner, with minimal behavioral issues. When asked by an adult to complete a certain chore, objecting was not an option; as punishment was common. According to John Rosemond from the Hartford Courant, “Your mom and dad paid more attention to one another than they paid to you.” He also commented, “They bought you very little, so you appreciated everything you had. And you took care of it” (Author John Rosemond, “Raising Kids In 1950s Households Vs. Today’s”). Children looked up
Life was good again and order had been restored to the society. Because people were financially stable, families grew larger; women and men married at earlier ages, had more children and moved to the suburbs. This caused a suburban boom. Marriage rates increased drastically and divorce rates plumped. Marriage was a “fifty-fifty deal” housewives were respected and had an equal say in decision making. Flexible parenting was encouraged; there was no absolute way to raise a child. A child that had been nurtured with love—especially maternal love—reason and good parental example would grow to become a decent member of
THOSE OF US WHO grew up in the 1950s got an image of the American family that was not, shall we say, accurate. We were told, Father Knows Best, Leave It to Beaver, and Ozzie and Harriet were not just the way things were supposed to be—but the way things were
The notion of an affectionate family framed the emergence of demographic changes. Birth rates fell and the life expectancy rose. From 1900 to 1930, the median age of American citizens rose from 22.9 to 26.5 (58). The youth population from ages 15 to 24 years declined. Thus, there was a higher adult- to- youth ratio and more caretakers available to supervise children. As a result o...
Then Dr. Benjamin Spock said we shouldn't spank our children when they misbehave because their little personalities would be warped and we might damage their self-esteem (Dr. Spock's son
Comparing its structure and function as it was in 1960 with what it had become in 1990 can highlight the dramatic changes in the American family. Until 1960 most Americans shared a common set of beliefs about family life; family should consist of a husband and wife living together with their children. The father should be the head of the family, earn the family's income, and give his name to his wife and children. The mother's main tasks were to support and enable her husband's goals, guide her children's development, look after the home, and set a moral tone for the family. Marriage was an enduring obligation for better or worse and this was due much to a conscious effort to maintain strong ties with children. The husband and wife jointly coped with stresses. As parents, they had an overriding responsibility for the well being of their children during the early years-until their children entered school, they were almost solely responsible. Even later, it was the parents who had the primary duty of guiding their children's education and discipline. Of course, even in 1960, families recognized the difficulty of converting these ideals into reality. Still, they devoted immense effort to approximating them in practice. As it turned out, the mother, who worked only minimally--was the parent most frequently successful in spending the most time with her children. Consequently, youngsters were almost always around a parental figure -- they were well-disciplined and often very close with the maternal parent who cooked for them, played with them, and saw them off to and home from school each day.
ago mothers would stay at home with their children while the father went to work
The premise of traditional parenting is one of the key ideologies behind Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Rappaccini 's daughter; the passage of multiple generations however, has rendered this notion impractical and irrational due to societal shifts that have changed the mentality of parents throughout history. In effect, I will apply psychological criticism to investigate the effects of the declining traditional parenting.
Parenting styles were first introduced in 1966 by Diana Baumrind, a developmental psychologist (K. H. Grobman, 2008). Over the years parenting styles have been shown to have a lasting impact on a child’s development. Parents do not always fall into one category of parenting style, but can be a combination of more than one, or even all three. These parenting styles were defined by tracing the timeline of parenting methods throughout history. The three main parenting styles recognized by Diana Baumrind are the permissive parent, the authoritarian parent, and the authoritative parent. She noticed that there were certain trends in parenting styles. Styles of parenting stem from different eras throughout history, and the parenting method that was favored amongst the majority, at that time (Birgitte Coste, 2007). The authoritarian style of parenting originated in the "Pre Second World War Era." This method was developed by behaviorist, John Watson. Children were viewed in a strict, robotic, unfeeling manner, due to the harsh times of this era. A...
Parenting comes as a challenge to most people and is probably the most important job in the world. Parenting comes with love, care and of course discipline for the child. Great parenting aids the children in promoting emotional and physical health, giving them motivation, manners, and good moral values. Most children learn from what they see and if they see good things at home, that’s what they will remember. There are so many parenting styles out there but in the end it is the parents choice to choose how they want to parent their children. In Mr. and Mrs. Harsh-Heart’s case on parenting styles they chose to focus on strict discipline, rules and harsh consequences with even resulting to spanking. This is known as authoritarian parenting. Then, we have Mr. and Mrs. Easy- Going and they don’t involve punishment because they believe in natural consequences so their children can learn a lesson on their own here and there. This type of parenting is known as permissive parenting. Although these families have two totally different ways of parenting their children, each way of parenting has its own advantages, and disadvantages.