Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Colonization impact on african nations
Colonization impact on african nations
Colonization impact on african nations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Colonization impact on african nations
Colonization is a huge topic that has started being looked into and is bringing up the question, should the U.S. colonize South America? In the year 2030, U.S. government officials have started to discuss and decide whether or not to colonize struggling countries of South America. Officials have decided to look at previous efforts of colonizing, such as the colonization of Africa. These South American countries should be colonized for reasons such as their tropical resources and to improve the economy of these struggling countries.
South America has many resources that could be of good use, such as many different fruits and types of nuts. An article from the story “Things Fall Apart” described that, Africa had two main exports, palm oil
“World History: Patterns of Interaction” describes, Railroads, dams, and telephone and telegraph lines had been built in colonies within Africa to help with economic growth (World History: Patterns of Interaction, 2009, p.10). By building these railroads and such, the economy of Africa was able to grow through the help of colonization. Colonization could possibly help with South America’s economy like Europe did with Africa. National Geographic states in an article, “South America’s economic growth over the last half-century has prompted its cities to expand rapidly. These cities, however, often suffer from inefficient transportation and utility systems, pollution, and unregulated residential growth” (National Geographic, N.D., p.4). Building to improve these problems can improve the economy as well as increase accessibility to be able to travel within South America. Increased accessibility would allow further movement in South America, which will benefit the U.S. in the long run. Colonizing uncolonized countries are good and beneficial, conversely, there are downfalls to
“World History: Patterns of Interaction” states, “The artificial boundaries combined or unnaturally divided groups, creating problems that plagued African colonies during European occupation” (World History: Patterns of Interaction, 2009, p.10). When Africa was being colonized, African colonies had been separated or combined which is bad for certain groups may have rivalries with other group. Consequently causing conflict of the people and possible conflict for the U.S. There are still many benefits of colonizing South America, such as decreasing the amount of local warfare and fighting. In “World History: Patterns of Interaction” it is described that, through this colonization, local warfare had been decreased (World History: Patterns of Interaction, 2009, p.10). By reducing warfare more peace is able to be achieved creating more allies for the U.S. More allies is good for the U.S. to have if there is to be a war.
The U.S. should colonize South America for several reasons, these reasons include, but are not limited to, the resources of South America that could provide useful for consumption and trade, and the improvement of South America’s economy providing accessibility to South America. If South America is colonized the U.S. will not only have more resources for trade and such, but will have a new ally as well to help aid if any wars are
The colonization of Africa gave the Europeans more workers and workspace that boost them economically and financially. According to Document D, many African colonies exports very many resources such as cotton for fabrics and various foods for processing and meals. The help of African colonies was very beneficial to Europe. The economical growth can be proven with Document E, where the amount of exports from Africa grew from less than 5 million British pounds in 1854 to over 20 million in 1900. So the most beneficial part of the African colonies was the boost they gave Europe in economical
Major places like Peru Ecuador. And Bolivia have major industries such as food processing, mining, wood products, textiles, petroleum, and more. Their major agricultural products would be cacao, balsa wood, shrimp, cotton, sugarcane, and more. (Doc B)Some more major places in South America in South America like Chile and Argentina make most of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) and employ over half of the population. They produce grains, fruits such as grapes, and beef cattle, (Doc C) South Americas history many interesting types of civilizations like Aztec of around A.D. 1200- A.D 1521. (Doc 1) South America has some amazing features but also has a downside. From the 1950’s to now more people live in urban areas rather than rural areas unlike 1950 with most of the population living in rural areas. (Doc D) Today in Brazil, one of the largest economies in the world, there is a very large gap between the rich and the poor. Government is trying to build a bridge between the gap but this is hard knowing that 2% of the population are higher class. (Doc E) Around the Amazon River there is forest. But deforestation is making all this go away based on a survey taken in 2000-2005, Most of it is caused by Cattle Ranches. About 35% is taken up by small-scale, subsistence agriculture, The rest taken up by fires, urbanization construction, logging and large scale commercial agriculture. (Doc
One of the main reasons Europeans colonized Africa was for their useful resources. There are countless assets in the African landscape that were wanted by other nations. The European countries had access to some of the worlds most needed resources such as cotton, oils, coal, gold, and diamonds because they controlled Africa. This is shown on a chart of African colonies and their exports. ("Selected African Colonies and Their Exports" 269). This shows how the European countries carefully selected the land they did, to get certain resources they needed or wanted to use to benefit from. Another chart from a book by Trevor Lloyd, (Lloyd, The British Empire), displays the large jump of exports to Africa from 1854 to 1900. What that means is once Great Britain established complete control of South Saharan Africa, they began to export the resources they found that they could use. These charts are proof of how the European's wanted resources, and that is one of the main reasons for the imperialization of Africa. Not only did the European nations want the continent's resources, but they had an equal hunger for power.
...South America and became important export crops in West Africa in the 20th century. While little information was provided on our specific topic, this source was useful for the information of the Columbian Exchange.
During the Spanish American war, many people were divided over the topic of imperialism. Ultimately, many benefits came with the US territory expanding. Not only did the US get bigger, but many aspects of our nation improved significantly. American expansion abroad was justified because it helped the military and economy advance greatly.
America was originally colonized because European countries were looking for an easier way to the Indies. This brings forth the thought that colonization made life easier for the Europeans. It brought luxuries and items that were needed to countries that requested them and it encouraged more trade throughout the countries. Though this was advantageous for the Europ...
All in all, over the course of the presidencies of Monroe, Roosevelt, FDR, and Nixon, the U.S. intervened in Latin America numerous times. Now, is it the right thing to do? At those specific points in time, the government thought so. Various arguments can be forged over the suitability of the actions of the U.S. during these times; however, that is a discussion for another time.
Immediately following the war with Spain, the United States had both the political will to pursue imperial policies and the geopolitical circumstances conducive to doing so. But the way in which these policies would manifest was an open question; was the impulse to actively remake the world in America’s Anglo-Saxon image justified? Hence, there were several models of American imperialism at the turn of the twentieth century. In the Philippines, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Samoa, the United States asserted unwavering political control. In Cuba, and later throughout most of the Caribbean basin, the economic and political domination of customarily sovereign governments became the policy. Ultimately, the United States was able to expand its territory
Document 3, a letter from an African King, provides a great example of this stating, ¨´We cannot reckon how great the damage is...the corruption and licentiousness that our country is being completely depopulated¨ (Doc 3). The king cries out to portugal for help stating his main concern as the depopulation of his natives causing damage to his country. The depopulation of his natives is caused by the slave trade a crucial part of the columbian exchange/triangular trade, this depopulation leaves Africa with less and less workers. Less workers ment less production which equals less trade ultimately leading to many African countries economies falling/declining. Not only did their economies fall, but there governments did as well, as the columbian exchange provided Africans with guns which caused wars to be fought in which some countries power and wealth increased greatly while others dissolved. Yet another reason the columbian exchange shaped more economic changes than
The economy of Latin American countries such as Argentina have often focused on only one main product at a time and imported many of the other products needed. Argentina especially followed this economic strategy in the late 1800’s. Latin American countries focus on one product it does well and does not stray from that product. The countries were just following trends and taking advantage of what the market dictates is a worthwhile product. This strategy can fall short of having long-term success and lead to a land of poverty. This was the case in most every country in Latin America, and all the economy revolved around the growth of industry in each country. Technology, increased immigration, European influence, and political policy all influenced the economic state of Latin American countries and led to economic struggles.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Mignolo, W. D. (2005). The Idea of Latin America (pp. 1-94). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
In the 1500s to 1967, European Imperialism had a giant negative impact on Africa. They caused many social and economic issues mainly in South Africa, Congo, and West Africa. This rivalry that was created with the Europeans from imperialism caused the Africa to have no way of developing and competing with the rest of the world.
Scholars have debated not only the nature of Iberian colonialism, but also the impact that independence had on the people of Latin America. Historian Jaime E. Rodriguez said that, “The emancipation of [Latin America] did not merely consist of separation from the mother country, as in the case of the United States. It also destroyed a vast and responsive social, political, and economic system that functioned well despite many imperfections.” I believe that when independence emerged in Latin America, it was a positive force. However, as time progressed, it indeed does cause conflict.
In order to properly understand the effects of colonization, one must look at its history. Most of Africa was relatively isolated from Europe throughout early world history, but this changed during the 17th to the 20th centuries. Colonization efforts reached their peak between the 1870s and 1900 in the “Scramble for Africa” which left the continent resembling a jigsaw puzzle Various European powers managed to colonize Africa including Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain. This intense imperialist aggression had three major causes. The primary reason was simply for economic gain. Africa is refuge to vast, unexplored natural resources. European powers saw their opportunity and took it. Another motive was to spread the Christian religion to the non-Christian natives. The last major incentive was to demonstrate power between competing European nations. African societies did try to resist the colonial takeover either through guerilla warfare or direct military engagement. Their efforts were in vain, however, as by the turn of the century, only Liberia and Ethiopia remained not colonized. European powers colonized Africa according to the guidelines established by the Berlin Act (1885). Many of the colonized nations were ruled indirectly through appointed governor...