Believing In God: Pascal's Wager

1150 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of pascals wager

Pascal’s Wager is not an effective tool in showing that believing in God is the best bet because it overlooks fundamental questions which render the wager redundant.
Famous Mathematician and Philosopher Blaise Pascal was born in 1623 France, where Catholicism was the practiced religion. He himself a devout Catholic, came up with ‘Pascal’s Wager’, a method aimed to show that it is a better bet to believe in God. Pascal saw this as a good argument for believing in God, however objections arose from fellow intellectuals. The wager states that; 
 ‘‘Either God exists, or He does not. To which view shall we incline?Reason cannot decide for us one way or the other… Let us weigh the gain and the loss involved in wagering that God exists. Let us estimate …show more content…

This is because there are too many unknowns about which god is real and how to get infinite rewards. A strongly religious person, like Pascal himself, may argue that it is better to believe in God even if he does not exist in reality. Many religious people hold the idea that God gives life meaning. Does this mean that atheists live meaningless lives? Pascal might argue that the believer is rewarded in this life the gift of purpose. I believe that purpose is not tied to the existence of God and that people can have purpose without religion. He may say “look at the positive effect ‘God’ can have on an individual, whether existent or imagined”. In response I would remind Pascal that religion has also done a lot of harm to people. Consider homosexuals, who’s nature is considered a sin in the Bible, Qur’an and various other religious texts. Surely they lose value of life by believing in God, rather than being able to accept their sexuality without feelings of guilt or self-hatred. The opposing view to Pascal would be that to wager for God is to waste life. Nietzsche calls this ‘life-denying’ and raises an important point that we are wasting the gift of this finite life in an almost greedy pursuit to live forever. Pascal’s wager treats wagering for God as though we lose nothing but in reality religion may cost us our time, money, relationships, jobs, freedom, opportunities and open-mindedness to name a few. Because there is a chance we only have one life, we should not deny ourselves from experiencing

Show More
Related

  • William Clifford And Blaise Pascal

    971 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to be considered a non-evidentialist, one must believe that actual evidence is not required for all of our beliefs. Pascal believ...

    Read More

  • Teleological Argument Vs Pascal's Wager Essay

    799 Words  | 2 Pages

    Our purpose in this life is a question that has been asked countless times and answered in various ways. One of the central rational arguments for the existence of God is the teleological argument. This argument focuses in on how intricately designed aspects of life that could not have just fallen into place on their own, they must have had a creator. One of the central practical arguments for the possible existence of God is Pascal’s Wager. This argument is based on weighing the consequences that result from the gamble of believing in God or not believing in God. These arguments can be viewed as comparable and also as diverse.

    Read More

  • Pascal's Wager and Global Warming

    1198 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the other hand, you could choose not to believe in God. If there is no God, then you are fine. You can sin all you like, you can allow yourself transgressions and forbidden acts, and the only punishments you will face will be those of this life. If, however, you lived thusly and there is a God, then you face an eternity of torture and unbearable misery. So, Pascal reasoned, one would do best to believe in God and act accordingly. That way, if you're wrong, the worst thing that could happen is that you were more pious and caring then you may have otherwise been. If you do not believe in God and you turn out to be wrong, the risks become terrifying.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Imagine There's No Heaven

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    This essay explains how he feels about any religion, “To choose unbelief is to choose mind over dogma, to trust in our humanity instead of all these dangerous divinities…The ancient wisdoms are modern nonsenses. Live in your own time, use what we know, and as you grow up, perhaps the human race will finally grow up with you, and put aside childish

    Read More

  • Pascal Wager Term Paper Outline

    1892 Words  | 4 Pages

    Thesis: Pascal’s Wager calls for the need for people to choose to believe in something, to allow them the chance of gaining more than ever, and with that your chances for gain will be higher with the belief of a god, but the highest with the belief in the God of the Bible.

    Read More

  • The Cosmological Argument and the Mystical Argument

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    The controversial topic involving the existence of God has been the pinnacle of endless discourse surrounding the concept of religion in the field of philosophy. However, two arguments proclaim themselves to be the “better” way of justifying the existence of God: The Cosmological Argument and the Mystical Argument. While both arguments attempt to enforce strict modus operandi of solidified reasoning, neither prove to be a better way of explaining the existence of God. The downfall of both these arguments rests on commitment of fallacies and lack of sufficient evidence, as a result sabotaging their validity in the field of philosophy and faith.

    Read More

  • The Question of God: C.S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex and the Meaning of Life

    774 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Question of God is divided into two parts. The first part, titled: “What Should We Believe” seeks to answer the first half of the questio...

    Read More

  • Pascal's Wager Strengths And Weaknesses

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    Pascal’s Wager was a major strength of his theory on God and Religion. The argument made in Pascal’s Wager is an example of apologetic philosophy. It was written and published in Pensées by the 17th century French philosopher Blaise Pascal. Pascal’s Wager claims that all humans must bet their lives on whether God exists. He argues that rational people should seek to believe in God. If God does not exist the loss is minimal, but if God does exist there is an infinite gain, eternity in Heaven. It was a ground-breaking theory because it utilized probability theory and formal decision theory. Pascal’s Wager is applicable both to atheists and theists. While other philosophies may

    Read More

  • Pascal’s Wager

    986 Words  | 2 Pages

    Pascal’s Wager is an argument that tries to convince non-theists why they should believe in the existence of the Christian god. Pascal thinks non-theists should believe in God’s existence because if a non-theist is wrong about the existence of God they have much more to lose than if a theist is wrong about the existence of God.

    Read More

  • Pascal's Wager

    1549 Words  | 4 Pages

    Modern debates over religion, more specifically God, focus primarily on whether or not sufficient evidence exists to either prove or disprove the existence of a God. Disbelievers such as biologist Richard Hawkins tend to point to the indisputable facts of evolution and the abundance of scientific evidence which seem to contradict many aspects of religion. Conversely, believers such as Dr. A. E. Wilder-Smith describe the controversial aspects of science, and how the only possible solution to everything is a supreme being. However, mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal refused to make either type of argument; he believed that it was impossible to determine God’s existence for certainty through reason. Instead, he suggested that rational individuals should wager as though God does indeed exist, because doing so offers these individuals everything to gain, and nothing to lose. Unfortunately, Pascal’s Wager contains numerous fallacies, and in-depth analysis of each one of his arguments proves that Pascal’s Wager is incorrect.

    Read More

  • Criticism of Pascal's Wager

    1542 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ople to come back to Church and to believe in God but not out of self-interest. In order for the argument to accomplish this it must first be rewritten. It needs to define its terms (i.e. the use of the word God), it should not be based on chance or self-interest but rather to make known to the person that it is quite possible that God exists, and finally, it should include a fifth outcome where a person believes in God out of self-interest and is eternally damned anyway for lack of faith, love and for selfishness. Pascal’s Wager calls to mind a famous quote by Albert Camus: “I would rather live my life as if there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than live my life as if there isn't and die to find out there is.” Until Pascal’s argument is solid and fully developed, one should not adopt the argument as a mean for conversion, evangelization or lifestyle.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Blaise Pascal´s Book: Pensees

    1088 Words  | 3 Pages

    When looking at Pascal’s arguments that emerge in Pensees; the history, ideas, and people that influenced Pascal must be examined. Many of Pascal’s arguments involve the unity of both religion and science. This can be very controversial at a time where an absolute monarch challenges and tries to destroy other faith practices. Along with introducing scientific ideas others may misinterpret as trying to disprove God’s existence. Pascal was heavily influenced by the Christian church and was a firm believer in God. In fact, Pascal’s discoveries and experiments only solidify his faith even more. Pensees is Pascal’s thoughts on God and some other subjects that tie philosophy and the nature of man.

    Read More

  • The Compatibility of Faith and Reason

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    In today’s modern western society, it has become increasingly popular to not identify with any religion, namely Christianity. The outlook that people have today on the existence of God and the role that He plays in our world has changed drastically since the Enlightenment Period. Many look solely to the concept of reason, or the phenomenon that allows human beings to use their senses to draw conclusions about the world around them, to try and understand the environment that they live in. However, there are some that look to faith, or the concept of believing in a higher power as the reason for our existence. Being that this is a fundamental issue for humanity, there have been many attempts to explain what role each concept plays. It is my belief that faith and reason are both needed to gain knowledge for three reasons: first, both concepts coexist with one another; second, each deals with separate realms of reality, and third, one without the other can lead to cases of extremism.

    Read More

  • Lessing's Conception of a Universal Religion

    1123 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, Lessing’s Nathan the Wise argues in favour of a religion in which the focus is redirected on human beings. His conception of a universal religion of reason refers to a praising of human reason without ignoring existing religious beliefs. However, it appears that these two conceptions of religion cannot coexist. Moreover, Lessing’s conception of a universal religion of reason seems to fail to understand the nature of religion, which is to apprehend the causes of one’s existence.

    Read More

  • The Nature of Faith

    1299 Words  | 3 Pages

    In many aspects of our lives, the use of faith as a basis for knowledge can be found. Whether it is faith in the advice of your teacher, faith in a God or faith in a scientific theory, it is present. But what is faith? A definition of faith in a theory of knowledge context is the confident belief or trust in a knowledge claim by a knower, without the knower having conclusive evidence. This is because if a knowledge claim is backed up by evidence, then we would use reason rather than faith as a basis for knowledge . If we define knowledge as ‘justified true belief’, it can be seen that faith, being without justification, can never fulfill this definition, and so cannot be used as a reliable basis for knowledge. However, the question arises, what if a certain knowledge claim lies outside of the realm of reason? What if a knowledge claim cannot be justified by empirical evidence and reasoning alone, such as a religious knowledge claim? It is then that faith allows the knower to decide what is knowledge and what is not, when something cannot be definitively proved through the use of evidence. When assessing faith as a basis for knowledge in the natural sciences, the fact arises that without faith in the research done before us, it is impossible to develop further knowledge on top of it. Yet at the same time, if we have unwavering faith in existing theories, they would never be challenged, and so our progress of knowledge in the natural sciences would come to a standstill. Although I intend to approach this essay in a balanced manner, this essay may be subject to a small degree of bias, due to my own non-religious viewpoint.

    Read More

More about Believing In God: Pascal's Wager

Open Document