Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on emotions
Essay on understanding emotions
Essays on emotions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on emotions
The “judgment” theory of emotions is a favored theory among philosophers. According to this theory, at the heart of emotion is a cognitive state: an emotion either is or essentially includes a judgment or belief. If I am in love with a person, this means not just that I get warm and fuzzy feelings inside when the person approaches, but that I have certain beliefs about them – that they are worthy, lovable kind of person. Similarly, if I am afraid of a bear, I don’t just experience a twinge or a pang; I believe or judge the bear to be dangerous or threatening to me. At the heart of love, it would seem, is the judgment that the beloved is a wonderful person; at the heart of fear is the judgment that I am being threatened. Being afraid of the bear does seem to entail that I believe it is threatening me. Likewise it seems contradictory to say that I love a person, but there’s nothing about them that I believe to be appealing. Furthermore, a change in the relevant evaluative judgment may produce a change in one’s emotional state. I cannot be angry that you have insulted me if I …show more content…
This suggests that we are arguing about evaluative judgments: you are trying to convince me that I am right or wrong to make a particular evaluative judgment. If emotions were nothing but feelings, argument would be beside the point and normally you would not try to argue somebody out of pain. Overall, philosophers generally agree that emotions have intentionality. “Thus we can understand the “formal object” of an emotion as its essential intentionality – the kind of object to which it must be directed fi it is to be that emotion.”(pg.12) The judgments and objects that constitute our emotions are those which are especially important to us, meaningful to us, concerning matters in which we have invested
Sian Beilock is the author of this novel, the information written by her would be considered credible due to the fact that she is a leading expert on brain science in the psychology department at the University of Chicago. This book was also published in the year 2015 which assures readers that the information it contains is up to date and accurate. The novel is easy to understand and the author uses examples of scientific discoveries to help make the arguments more relatable. Beilock goes into depth about how love, is something more than just an emotion, it derives from the body’s anticipation. “Volunteers reported feeling
What is an emotion? William James and Jean-Paul Sartre present two different arguments regarding what constitutes an emotion. This paper will explore William James' analysis of emotion as set out in his 1884 essay . It will attempt to discover the main points of his view, and then present Sartre's rebuttal of this view taken from his essay on emotions . Concluding with an explanation regarding why Sartre's account is flawed and James's argument is the stronger of the two, it will use outside examples to demonstrate the various weaknesses and strengths within the two perspectives.
That is, for example, anger (a feeling) may be felt in reaction to a negative event or stimuli such as loss of an item (Solomon uses having his car stolen as the most prominent example in his article), a misunderstanding, or a lack of sleep. To use Solomon's example of the loss of a vehicle, it can be shown that the choice of being angry at the situation (the voluntary feeling) fits all for aspects of Solomon's argument. Firstly, feeling anger at the loss of a vehicle, is the feeling being experienced by an individual. This is distinct from the emotion felt which is brought on due to the negative event occurring, possibly for a more comp...
Metaphorically, emotional energy begins with what Peterson (2007) calls a “thud” and causes a feeling in the gut, such as anger, excitement, jealousy, or happiness. This feeling, whether it is positive or negative, grows and puts pressure on the heart, hardening it and closing the openness one may have earlier had towards what other people feel or ideas they may have. When the heart hardens, the brain becomes “flat” and causes the ears to become barred from hearing anything besides what is inside the mind. This process, called th...
It has long been thought that reason was what moral judgment was based off of. As time changed, emotions have become influential, causally sufficient, and necessary when it comes to forming moral judgments. The authors find that both are present when forming moral judgments (Polzler). This source is credible as it was found in an academic peer-reviewed journal, and on a college sponsored database.
The road taken by Warren, that emotionality requires self-observation and integration, is far too polar in that it completely negates the hormonal influence on emotionality. Emotionality ought not be defined in either of these ways because when doing so one wrongly restricts different form of emotionality. This would be the equivalent to defining a dog as a four legged animal, or a domesticated carnivorous animal with four legs, long snout, fur, canine teeth, and a tendency to bark or whine. The former definition sets the bar too low in that every four legged animal can qualify as a dog whereas the latter sets the bar too high in that some dogs may not actually qualify as dogs using that definition. For this reason the definition of a dog has to be somewhere in the middle. Thus when extending this example to emotionality it becomes clear one should take an Aristotelian approach in defining emotion because it would not be polarizing. The emotions we feel (happy, sad, angry, etc) is partly influenced by hormones such as dopamine and partly influenced by our own self-observation of markers. Integrating hormones and self-observation ensures we cover the spectrum of emotionality. This further ensures that the capability of
Plutchik, Robert (1980), Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: Vol. 1. Theories of emotion, 1, New York: Academic
Does the basic understanding of love require logic or emotion? Stendhal's The Crystallization of Love is based on the "belief that behavior is governed by passions and self-interest" (Past to Present p. 91). The idea that love is something to be studied and observed under a microscope is the attitude Stendhal conveys toward the reader. Although, love is seen as a passionate and unexplainable phenomenon in most cultures, it is not in his eyes. Stendhal's concept for his essay is based on his own erratic experiences with love. The detached approach that he takes is one of fear and resentment. This leads to an unstable foundation for his theory on love. The concept of love from Stendhal's point of view is very contained and dispassionate, but love is messy and Stendhal's views on it are not.
Sentiments such as beauty, revenge, pleasure, pain, create moral motivation, and action, and are immune to falsity and truth. They are the foundation for which morals are built, and exist apart from any reasoning. Thesis: In moral motivation, the role of sentiment is to drive an intrinsically instilled presence within us to examine what we would deem a moral act or an immoral act, and act accordingly, and accurately upon the sentiments that apply. These sentiments may be assisted by reasons, but the reason alone does not drive us to do what we feel is necessary.
In his influential paper “Feeling and Thinking. Preferences need no Inferences” (Zajonc, 1980), he argued for the idea that affect is “precedent to the intellective qualities and elements of experience” (para. 1), and in line with this he put forward several hypothesis to exhibit the supremacy of affect in information processing - in its independence, primacy and automaticity - over cognition. He collected and presented a host of empirical findings to support his argument. Among those, the mere-exposure effect - the experimental evidence for subject’s preferences, or liking, by merely being exposed to certain stimuli without the subjects’ conscious (and thus assumedly cognitive) processing of them, was cited as the supporting evidence for preferential processing of affect before cognition (or “feeling without knowing” as described by Zajonc) (Zajonc, 1980). He also based his argument on the biological assumption that distinctive brain area, specifically the locus coeruleus, was responsible for the processing of affective information, and thus to complete his argument for the independence of the emotion apart from
Emotion is the “feeling” aspect of consciousness that includes physical, behavioral, and subjective (cognitive) elements. Emotion also contains three elements which are physical arousal, a certain behavior that can reveal outer feelings and inner feelings. One key part in the brain, the amygdala which is located within the limbic system on each side of the brain, plays a key role in emotional processing which causes emotions such as fear and pleasure to be involved with the human facial expressions.The common-sense theory of emotion states that an emotion is experienced first, leading to a physical reaction and then to a behavioral reaction.The James-Lange theory states that a stimulus creates a physiological response that then leads to the labeling of the emotion. The Cannon-Bard theory states that the physiological reaction and the emotion both use the thalamus to send sensory information to both the cortex of the brain and the organs of the sympathetic nervous system. The facial feedback hypothesis states that facial expressions provide feedback to the brain about the emotion being expressed on the face, increasing all the emotions. In Schachter and Singer’s cognitive arousal theory, also known as the two-factor theory, states both the physiological arousal and the actual arousal must occur before the emotion itself is experienced, based on cues from the environment. Lastly, in the cognitive-mediational theory
To this, I respond that every emotion has exceptions. For example, the emotion fear still alerts humans of danger, despite the fact that we do not fear everything that is dangerous to us. Think of sugar and cigarette, for instance. In the United States, heart disease is the leading cause of death. Furthermore, research has shown that heart disease is likely to result from a sugary diet or a smoking habit; however, not many people tremble in fear while baking cookies or walking past a smoker on the street.
It is a well-known fact that different factors affect on human behavior as well as various aspects of people’s life. Among them the emotions detect a powerful force on humans. Strong emotions may cause people to take actions they might not perform as usual, or obviate situations that they generally enjoy. Psychologists, researchers, and philosophers have proposed a set of different theories that explain how and why people experience the emotions. I have chosen two theories of emotion that I am interested in such as: the James-Lange Theory of Emotion and the Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion. This paper describes those theories by comparing and contrasting them;
Emotions are defined as "stereotypic patterns of the body, which are triggered by the central nervous system in response to distinct external environmental situations or to the recollection of memories related to such situations." (2) In other words, this means the emotions are the way the nervous system reacts to different situations one might find themselves in. In order to survive, emotional responses must be present. (2) "Whenever an emotion is triggered, a network of brain regions (traditionally referred to as the limbic system) generates a pattern of stereotypic outputs, which ultimately induce a biological response of the body." (2) These stereotypic outputs are what humans call emotions. They are predictable responses to certain situations, for instance when a person is in a sad situation, they will cry and feel depressed or if a person is in a happy situation, they will laugh and smile. These responses are because "specific circuits of the emotional motor system have evolved to both generate this stereotypic emotional facial response, as well as instantaneously recognize it when it occurs in somebody else." (2) This holds true for people in love, when you see someone in love you can tell because their face tells all.
One scientist, Damasio, provided an explanation how emotions can be felt in humans biologically. Damasio suggested, “Various brain structures map both the organism and external objects to create what he calls a second order representation. This mapping of the organism and the object most likely occurs in the thalamus and cingulate cortices. A sense of self in the act of knowing is created, and the individual knows “to whom this is happening.” The “seer” and the “seen,” the “thought” and the “thinker” are one in the same.” By mapping the brain scientists can have a better understandi...