Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis of dystopian literature
Dystopian literature characteristics
Dystopian texts essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Handicapping the Above Average Would life be simpler if everyone was edited to be equal? The short narrative “Harrison Bergeron” is about the Government forcing equality on citizens by the use of impediments; while doing so they prevent all of the residents from further developing. The year is 2081, it is a harsh and troublesome year, the citizens are punished if they don't fit into the "average" category, thus meaning if they're above average in physical abilities, intelligence, natural beauty, or any variety of capabilities they are burdened and installed with handicaps in order to prevent someone from being above average. Being above average means that one of the citizens is more attractive, stronger, more intelligent or quicker than …show more content…
She is known to be of average intelligence. Whereas her husband is incredibly gifted therefore is encumbered with handicaps, the headset that scrambles his thoughts as well as heavyweights to restrain him. The government attempting to even out the playing field by handicapping isn’t promoting equality but rather diminishing the naturally gifted and superior. That being said, it suggests that one of the vital concepts of this short story is that the government is a dictatorship wanting to degrade one’s humanity in order to make the more dull people feel less dull. Even with the Government placing the handicaps, George Bergeron, Hazel’s husband still cannot be compared to Hazel. He has to wear the headset, but because he is so mentally advanced he is still able to make good judgments for himself. For example; Hazel asks George to take off the handicaps because they’re giving him a headache, however, he knows that this would lead to trouble with the government and reassures her that it is alright. In today’s society, he would be considered a genius due to the fact that he is incredibly gifted and
Kurt Vonnegut, a modern American writer, composed stories about fictional situations that occurred in futuristic versions of today’s world. His stories included violence, both upon oneself and one another, and characters who sought out revenge. In “2BR02B” and “Harrison Bergeron”, Vonnegut conveys physical violence most likely experienced while a prisoner of World War 2, as a way to show how war brings pain and destruction.
At the first glance, an image of the society portrayed in the “Harrison Bergeron” short will put the reader at a halt. This short story depicts a nation that has made the world a place of pure equality. “They weren't only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else.” (Vonnegut). The government had completely taken over the nation and its people. There were handicaps for those who had advantages over anyone else. Power was non-existent in this land. Mainly because all of it belonged to the government. If there was ever a time to see the imbalance of power it would be now. This story is not only a fictitious short to entertain the reader. This Short is a warning to the world providing a view of the consequences of power. “Ironically, no one really benefits from these misguided attempts to enforce equality” (Themes and Construction: "Harrison Bergeron"). Even on the television programs, beautiful women with handicaps placed on their faces. “They were burdened with sashweights and bags of birdshot, and their faces were masked, so that no one, seeing a free and graceful gesture or a pretty face, would feel like something the cat drug in.” (Vonnegut). An elaborate handicap had been placed over the whole country and the public was fine with it! Power causes more than a hardship if not detected. It ruins lives. The people of this short will never know what it means to be
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living. The short novel “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut presents a futuristic portrayal of a world where everyone is equal in every way possible. In “Harrison Bergeron,” Vonnegut displays the clear flaws in society that lead to the creation of a horrific dystopia that lacks genuine human emotions, fails to develop as a civilized community and is strictly government
Moreover, within the text, the significance of symbolism is apparent as there are indications of the presence of different handicaps. Notably, those with above average physical attributes and above average intelligence are required by law to wear handicaps. Thus, the application and enforcement of handicaps are metaphors for sameness, because individuals with advantageous traits are limited and refrained from using their bodies and brains to their maximum abilities, for that is considered to be unfair to those who does not possess the same level of capability. Several main examples of handicaps includes “...47 pounds of birdshot… ear radios… spectacles intended to make [one] not only half blind but to [provide] whanging headaches”. Therefore, the intensity of the handicaps is a sign of the government’s seriousness in the field of administering disabilities onto their own citizens. Unfortunately, in order to maintain the sickly “equality”, the people are stripped off of their freedom. When announcers are unable to speak properly, and ballerinas are unable to dance properly, and musicians unable to perform properly, and people are unable to formulate thoughts properly — it is not a matter of equality, but a matter how low society
Hazel Bergeron does not need a handicap to prevent her from having intelligent thoughts like her husband simply because she is not as smart as he is.
Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle once said, “The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” Kurt Vonnegut portrays Aristotle’s philosophy brilliantly in his short story “Harrison Bergeron.” The story depicts the American government in the future mandating physical handicaps in an attempt to make everyone equal. Vonnegut describes a world where no one is allowed to excel in the areas of intelligence, athletics, or beauty. Yet, the inequalities among the people shine even brighter. Vonnegut uses satire to explore the question of whether true equality can ever really exist.
In the year 2081, people were finally equal, and everyone was equal in every which way. No one could be more intelligent than the other or more attractive. All of the equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution. The reader may feel sorry for George Bergeron because of his tallness and his handicaps, Hazel’s normal intelligence, and the comments about their son Harrison.
An impartial society: Utopia or Hell? What would happen to the world if the people were literally equal in every aspect of their lives? In the futuristic short story, “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., the world is finally living up to America’s first amendment of everyone being created equal. In this society, the gifted, strong, and beautiful are required to wear handicaps of earphones, heavy weights, and hideous masks, respectively. Thus, these constraints leave the world equal from brains to brawn to beauty. With the world constantly pushing for equality among people, Vonnegut reveals a world that society is diligently working toward. Through this foreshadowing of the future, Vonnegut attempts to use Diana Moon Glampers and
Harrison Bergeron’s mother, Hazel Bergeron, is the definition of the Handicapper General’s “normal” and model for enforced equality. Everyone must be leveled and thereby oppressed to her standards. Hazel’s husband, George Bergeron, is no exception. “‘I’d think it would be real interesting, hearing all the different sounds,’ said Hazel, a little envious. ‘All the things they think up.’” (Vonnegut 910). George suffers from his own comically ludicrous mental handicap. The fact that this incites jealousy in Hazel reaffirms the artificial equality Vonnegut ridicules. The author satirizes oppression in American society through his depictions of misery and restraint exhibited in his characters’ ordeals. “The different times that George is interrupted from thinking, and his inner monologue is cut, we have a sort of stopping his having dialogue with himself. So he can’t have a unique personality, which itself involves his worldviews” (Joodaki 71). Not being able to know oneself epitomizes
Their different personalities and mindsets created a nice balance between them. Their differences explained why, “Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she could think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter.” (Vonnegut 226). This proves how cruel this government is. They do not want the smartest individuals to defeat the government so they make it mentally and physically impractical for them to do so. For normal people, like Hazel, it does not matter what they think or say because it is not like they will follow up on their thoughts. That is how the government is keeping everyone in check without any backlash. The fact that George is wearing forty seven pounds of balls in a bag is worrying Hazel. She says, “’If you could just take a few out when you come home from work, said Hazel… ‘If I tried to get away with it, said George, ‘‘then other people’d get away with it-and pretty soon we’d be right back to the dark ages again, with everybody competing against everybody else. You wouldn’t like that, would you?”’ (Vonnegut 228). This whole conversation is the reason why the government knew that this new futuristic society would benefit them. Hazel knew that what
In this story everyone has specially designed gear which is used to equalize everyone's status. The main characters are a couple who have different abilities. One is smarter but athletically declined and the other is physically inclined but holds less intelligence. They are both watching a television show when a news broadcast comes on. During the broadcast, Harrison comes in and take off his handicapping gear. Wanting to overtake the government he decides to harass the news cast but in result he is killed by another handicapped individual. This makes the couple understand and realize the truth about the idea of equality and how it would be broken if handicapping wasn't used anymore. “we judge every difference we have onto one another.” “ First being an specific color, then gender, and even now financial stability.” These characters live in a world where they are forced to be equal. Equality in this story is portrayed as being unfair, forced, and
Although the comparisons are well hidden, both today’s society and the story ‘Harrison Bergeron’ share similar qualities. They both deal with equality, which leads to problems and consequences. A second similarity is the struggle of competition and trying to prevent it from occurring, which also leads to problems. Lastly, both struggle with normality, and the fact that it’s hard to accept that different is okay now.
Would a regular citizen enjoy being as skilled of a dancer as a ballerina? Or as intelligent as the next guy? In Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.’s story of Harrison Bergeron, handicaps, such as small radio’s that blast sharp sounds are used to prevent individuals from having more intellectual thoughts than others. The year is 2081 and everyone is equal in every which way. Handicapped George and his wife Hazel are watching a ballerina performance. The show is interrupted by an announcement to watch out for their son, Harrison Bergeron as he is under-handicapped and dangerous. The conflict begins when Harrison enters the studio and declares he is Emperor. He finds his ballerina Empress, and dances with her before being shot and killed by Handicapper General Diana, resolving the conflict. This event is a more specific account of Harrison’s conflict with the current society as a whole, which is reflected through the use of theme, symbolism, and point of view.
The compelling short story Harrison Bergeron, by Kurt Vonnegut, is set in a future dystopian society. The plot follows an “average family” in the year 2081 after the 211th, 212th, and 213th amendments to the constitution were added. These three laws establish the principle of equality; everyone must be equal in every aspect of life. To ensure this, the government utilizes “handicaps”, small machines or even body weights, to make certain no one person is better than anyone else. The center of the story, married couple Hazel and George, both have handicaps given to them by the Handicap General. As they are watching television one day, their incarcerated son appears on screen claiming to want to overthrow the government. Known as Harrison Bergeron, he was long ago locked up because of his in- humanlike strength and inability to be tamed by handicaps. But while broadcasted live, he proceeds to rip off his handicaps and dance around until he is shot and killed by Diana Moon, the Handicap General. The story ends with Hazel’s “average” intelligence forcing her to forget what she just witnessed, as her and George’s day goes on as normal. Completely unsettling, this story rem...
... male peers. Although this is obscene and horrible it reduced there will to work as hard as they could have. Today this is slowly being reversed. Education is again the only means by which we can overcome these feelings of inequality that the minorities feel and then everyone will work as hard as they can in relation to what their discount rate of work is. (This is the proportion of work to reward that a person is willing to do) some people have a high discount rate and will do as little work as they can to survive while others will work harder if the rewards are greater. This is more complicated than I can cover in the scope of this paper. In conclusion, in order to have a truly productive society that utilizes its people to the highest possible degree of utility we must make people believe that what is possible for others is truly possible for themselves.