Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of color choice for Impressionists
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the painting Beach Near Trouville (1864) by Eugène Boudin, Boudin uses formal techniques and artistic principles that enhance the painting as well as exemplify the period of Impressionism. These techniques and elements include but are not limited to colour, composition, texture, contrast, and lighting. Boudin's use of these formal techniques leave a lasting impression on the viewer of the painting. He was also able to successfully reflect many of the Impressionism movement's key elements.
Eugène Boudin used a large variety of colours in Beach Near Trouville. He used a mixture of cool tones, warm tones, and neutrals. Despite the large variety and the contrast of these different colours, they all work together to form a colour composition
…show more content…
that is pleasing to the eye. First and foremost, The sky is made up of cool toned blues, yet the blue tones are mixed with pale neutral colours in order to give the sky more dimension. It is this mixture of colours that gives the sky more of a realistic feel. Since the sky takes up so much space on the canvas, by having a mixture of colours as opposed to just a solid blue, Boudin was able to give the background of his painting a more dynamic look. Behind the crowd of people are grey tents, and underneath the crowd is shadowy beige sand. The people also sit on beige chairs. Grey and beige are two dull, uninteresting colours. They are not very eye-catching or particularly pleasing to the eye. In contrast, the people are clothed in vibrant and eye-catching colours. The colours of the clothing range from warm tones, to cool tones, to bright whites and rich blacks and browns. The composition of all of these colours come together to form a stimulating focal point. The people are further highlighted by the portrayal of sunlight, which makes some parts of the painting even brighter and richer in colour. Compared to the background of the image, the contrast of the colours that the people are wearing is so severe and so effective, and one's eyes are immediately drawn to the group of people when looking at this particular painting. The composition of Beach Near Trouville is quite striking, and Eugène Boudin's use of contrast in his composition makes for a dynamic piece of art. There is a large amount of open and empty space at the top of the painting (where the sky is depicted), which is juxtaposed with the crowded group of people standing on the sand near the bottom of the painting. Overall, the composition of the painting is a very stage-like composition. The action, or the main subject, is at the forefront of the painting and it is just about centered. The background is fairly plain and does not overshadow the focal point. The clear, open sky also gives the painting a sublime look - a theme more common to Romanticism but also prevalent among many Impressionist pieces. A cloudier sky or a busy sky would not give the painting the same effect, and would have taken some attention from the focal point of the piece (the crowd of people). The clear sky is very simple and picturesque, and ultimately draws more attention to the focal point. The large crowd of people undoubtedly draws the most attention due to the composition of the image. It stands out from the sky and the sand because it is so different and so detailed. It is busy, bright, and almost chaotic when compared to the calm composition of the skyline. These two parts of the painting are so drastically different, but work together harmoniously to form a beautiful composition. The different ways Eugène Boudin applied the paint in various areas of this painting has a large impact on how one views the piece.
Beach Near Trouville is a painterly style of work, as opposed to a linear one. There are not very many harsh lines separating one thing from another. There are a few lines to properly separate certain objects from the background, but even so, the lines are not harsh, nor do they look particularly unnatural. Many of the subjects of the painting seem to flow and fit together very naturally due to Boudin's use of loose brushstrokes. The sky and the sand both have a realistic feel to them since the brushstrokes Boudin used were so natural. An interesting aspect of this piece is how Boudin was able to create texture to draw focus to different places. For example, Boudin uses heavier strokes on the people and their outfits, and because of this, he puts emphasis on them and they stand out as the focal point of the painting. The people are also essentially faceless, but despite this fact, the way Boudin applied his paint still makes them stand out apart from the other elements in the painting. The people are not only colourful and vibrant, but the difference in the thickness of paint draws the eyes of the viewers directly to the crowd of people. The brushstrokes are heaviest on the people, and only on the people. The rest of the painting was done with lighter, more subtle brushstrokes. The sky and the rest of the background have a much neater feel in comparison to the group of people because of the way Boudin layered the paint in each respective
area. Boudin's portrayal of lighting in this painting is very specific. It is shown to be coming from the left corner of the scene. A notable quality of Impressionism is the artist's interest in the play of light in their works. Many Impressionist pieces focus on how light affects the scene or the subject they are trying to depict, as opposed to the scene or the subject itself. Eugène Boudin's Beach Near Trouville is an excellent example of this technique. Boudin painted the scene as if the light was coming from the left side, and therefore the right side of the canvas is much brighter than the left side. The left side is darker and shadowy because it is slightly behind and under the light, as opposed to the right side, which is in direct sunlight. Once again, this draws the eye of the viewer towards the crowd of people, as they are highlighted so perfectly by the illusion of sunlight, and therefore appear to be the main focus. The left side of the crowd is darker, and less focus is drawn to them as opposed to the right side, but Boudin also reflected this in their clothing. The people most highlighted by the sunlight are mostly clothed in bright colours that are enhanced by the look of sunlight. In contrast, the people sitting in the shadows are mostly clothed in darker colours that almost blend into the shadows and do not catch the eye the same way a bright red does. The brightest part of the image stands out as the focus, and is what the viewer is immediately drawn to when looking at the piece. Boudin's ability to draw focus by simply portraying sunlight is extremely effective and prevalent in this painting. In conclusion, as discussed throughout this essay, by using artistic principles and formal techniques such as colour, composition, texture, contrast, and lighting, Eugène Boudin created Beach Near Trouville (1864), a detailed and dynamic painting. Not only did Boudin manage to create an impactful piece of art, but he also created a piece that exemplified the Impressionism movement.
There are many different types of coasts that exist throughout the United States. The south shore of Long Island has a unique types of coast known as a barrier beach. Barrier beaches are long narrow land forms that are composed of sand and other lose sediments. These sediments are brought together by the actions of waves, currents and storm surges. Barrier beaches are subject to constant changes by the same forces. Sand is constantly eroded in one area an deposited in another. Barrier coasts are important for a number of reasons; they protect the mainland of Long Island from the open ocean and flooding during storms, for recreational use and the unique ecosystems which exist on barrier beaches.
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
If one came close to the figure’s stomach where there’s the seafoam green, one can see the strong mark makings of the paint brushes and knife strokes, making the paint come out of the canvas. Similarly, Brown also uses big paint strokes of different colors to direct viewer’s eyes around the artwork. For instance, on the left side of the figure, there is a big vertical downward motion of a brush stroke in maroon, that connects to a green streak that goes up and encompasses the figure’s head and then downward to the body of the figure, which outlines and pushes the figure to stand out. And to make our eyes go back to the figure, Brown paints a blue triangle on the chest, making it a focal point due to it’s dark color that stands out of the light colors. And if someone stood facing the side of the painting, one can see the thick globs of paint that would make the viewer take a double glance to see if it was either a painting or a sculpture, which reinforces the idea that the painting is coming alive and making one feel
...hese repeated vertical lines contrast firmly with a horizontal line that divides the canvas almost exactly in half. The background, upper portion of the canvas, seems unchanging and flat, whereas the foreground and middle ground of the painting have a lot of depth to them.
The colors are very specific, and there are sets of colors expressly grouped together for various types of paintings. There are sets for landscapes, flowers and wildlife painting. His style can be emulated using other brands of paints, but if the artist uses different shades of a color, the mixture will not result in the same tone found on a Ross painting. Lamp Black and Ivory Black may not blend exactly the same. Mixing green from yellow and Prussian Blue will not be the same green as yellow mixed with Phthalo Blue.
At first glance, the cheerful bright blue sky on the upper portion of the painting caught the most attention. The second dominant feature is the small sailboat with seagulls on the background where Monet illustrated in brightest white. Examining closely in that particular area, it is noticeable that the artist intended to incorporate a sheer layer of white surrounding the sailboat to create the illusion of sheen light breaking through the clouds and reflecting into the ocean. Monet used a variation of values along with the combination of heavy and light individual brushstrokes to create uneven tones to show the movement of the water caused by the weather and the sun. Several layers of underpaint can also be seen as the artist’s intention for the waves to appear fuzzier. The fuzzy wave in the foreground to the right is slightly bulged from the canvas showing the finer brushstroke slightly dabbed on the surface. Dense cracking is present all over the painting possibly due to the painting being very
His brush stokes are small and careful in the portrayal of grass to create the illusion of wind flowing through it. What also gives the grass a sense of “softness” is that the man looks comfortable enough to take off his shoes comfortably walk through it. Even though the brush stokes look small and soft he is still able to create the texture of stone on the house chimney, the bark on the tree, and the wood on the wheel barrel with these small careful strokes. The painting almost looks as if it would be soft to the touch and the mediums used have a lot to do with it. The gesso panel on wood makes the surface of the painting even and the paint glide easier across the surface, leaving no clumps of painting anywhere.
The texture of the canvas works very well with the subject matter portrayed in the painting. The grassy hill side and the leaves of the trees are especially complimented by the canvas. It makes the leaves feel like they are slightly moving, this combined with the lack of detail itself the leaves. This is contrasted nicely with the very detailed renderings of the trunks and branches of the trees, the conscious decision to put so much effort into the tree itself and then to use obvious brushwork in the leaves makes the trees much more firm and immovable in the landscape. The brushstrokes are very clean and precise on the trees in the background.
Georges Seurat used the pointillism approach and the use of color to make his painting, A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte, be as lifelike as possible. Seurat worked two years on this painting, preparing it woth at least twenty drawings and forty color sketched. In these preliminary drawings he analyzed, in detail every color relationship and every aspect of pictorial space. La Grande Jatte was like an experiment that involved perspective depth, the broad landscape planes of color and light, and the way shadows were used. Everything tends to come back to the surface of the picture, to emphasize and reiterate the two dimensional plane of which it was painted on. Also important worth mentioning is the way Seurat used and created the figures in the painting.
Walking in Impressionist Gallery, you might be enticed by a vivid cluster of color. With strong curiosity, you might go forward to scrutinize this piece carefully. The orange strokes at the center of the image form a row of cabins beside river and blue strokes around oranges ones create a lush forest. It is an oil painting on canvas depicting a cozy moment of one side of a riverbank in the countryside. On the Banks of a River, a joyous work created by Paul Cezanne with complementary colors, splotched strokes and thin layers expressed the painter’s light mood and appreciation to the nature.
This oil painting is an explosion of vibrant lush colors on a vast canvas, lending a captivating effect. O 'Keefe used rich greens and blues as the main color of the greenery and sky. “Waterfall No. 1” looks like a close up photograph of a majestic landscape. The absence of “context” in the painting presents the clouds in a new light as pure abstract. Since this painting has emphasis, it also has scale. One can see that the mountains take up huge amounts of space in the forefront which capture the massive size of the mountains in real life . Now if we look at the texture, the whole painting, every single bit of it, seems like it is very smooth compared to other oil painting, which sometimes have a fresco look with the oil paint looking plastered on the canvas. This painting to me seems like it is trying to show that the small waterfall is still as massive and as important and significant as the huge mountains in the forefront. This is achieved by having the mountains take up a lot of space but the focal point when you look at the painting being focused on the center on the
Gagnon employs a vivid palette, delicate treatment of light and atmosphere, and loose Impressionistic brushwork in his painting to represent the cultivated landscape, in which nature has synthesized with agriculture and local settlements. His enriching picture, conceived through his sympathetic understanding of his land and his people, immortalizes the beauty of the rural winter scene. The image, in essence, is a single whole that documents Canadian life; charming to the enthusiast of design and colour, but beyond value to the natives of the
Impressionism grew out of and followed immediately after the Barbizon school. A distinctive feature of the work of the Impressionists was the application of paint in touches of mostly pure colour rather than blended; their pictures appeared more luminous and colourful even than the work of Delacroix, from whom they had learned the technique. To the modern eye, the accepted paintings of the salon artists of the day seem pale and dull.
The composition concentrates mainly on the foreground .It has three main points of interest, the small rowing boats, the artificial island and the floating barge .It also has a stretch of trees and foliage in the background painted in a much lighter fashion. Monet?s painting has a very different composition from Renoir?s painting of Grenouillere, which was done at the same time; Renoir?s painting is focussed much more on the artificial island and the people on it. Monet uses a combination of thick bold brushstrokes and small short soft brushstrokes; this creates a nice varied look and helps give a good impression of perspective. The tone is also very varied as it is Very light in some areas, but it is also quite dark in others, such as the shades on the barge. The use of dark shades in the foreground makes the boat look so realistic and quite 3D. Although the middle ground is flatter this helps add to the perspective. The water ho...
...f the shadows is sprinkled with the orange of the ground, and the blue-violet of the mountains is both mixed with and adjacent to the yellow of the sky. The brushstrokes that carry this out are inspired by the Impressionists, but are more abundant and blunter than those an Impressionist would use.