Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Battle of the bulge principles of war
Battle of the bulge principles of war
Technology advancement in the military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Battle of the bulge principles of war
Battle Analysis is a method used by the U.S. Army to provide a systematic approach to the study of battles, campaigns, and other operations according to the (Combat Arms Center 1). The purpose behind the enforcement of students going through leadership courses to write a Battle Analysis essay is to broaden the overall future leaders of our Army’s way to advance their methodology of a battle and overall seek advancement to the way we fight from past to present. During this essay of the battle of the bulge we as a group will focus specifically on the Battle Analysis and the use of Artillery in the Battle of the Bulge. Due to the vast majority of Artillery utilized during the Battle of the Bulge we will refer and reference only a few Artillery …show more content…
units. During the Battle of the Bulge Artillery provided vital and effective timely fires daily to assist in the overall mission accomplishment of the Bulge to infantrymen. At this time in the Battle US Army forces completely outnumbered the German forces hands down, but the Germans still put up a fight continually attempting to seize and maintain the ground for which the US Army continued to be persistent in attaining pushing for forward progress into Bastogne. Major Albin Irzyk became quickly frustrated with the Germans continued attempt to maintain ground and on December 22nd between the 1300 hours and 1600 hours just south of Belgium the United States Artillery of the 4th Infantry Division received its call to rain down steel. The 22nd AFA (Armored Field Artillery) Self-propelled artillery of the 4th Infantry Division armed with three firing batteries consisting of 18 M7 howitzers otherwise known as the “Priest” (Patton 1); did a tremendous job silencing the enemy force by providing accurate fires of 42 rounds of HE within less than 20 minutes for a total processing time of 60 seconds to compute firing data. This wasn’t the first time that the 22nd AFA had fired. 22nd AFA already provided over 175 rounds of artillery broken down into four missions supporting a Cavalry unit that was pinned down on the battlefield. Subsequently, due to 22nd AFA being a mobile artillery force they provided a supportive amount of fires to task force commanders in which it is still reflected the same in battles to this day. During the Bulge the 22nd AFA was not the only artillery unit to provide suppressive, accurate, and defensive casualty producing effects on the battlefield.
Despite segregation, hatred, and being untrusted two African American 155mm artillery units would shape the battlefield. The 578th Field Artillery Battalion would be the first African American unit to land in Germany to be a part of this war. These soldiers speed distraught German tactics. The 578th FAB fought off Germans with ease until being pushed back behind friendly forces when Germans overwhelmed them. With the success of 578th FAB brought indifferent Officers, such as General Maxwell Lee that African Americans can be trusted and comprehend war tactics. When 101st Airborne Division needed support for its infantry, the 969th Field Artillery Battalion would be the second African American unit to participate in the Bulge. After supporting 101st missions, at Bastogne, the soldiers gave 969th FAB praise for their ability to provide defensive fires. These howitzers were so impressive that General Taylor issued a recommendation for an award. Taylor was so ecstatic that he stated, “A recommendation for a unit citation of the 969th Field Artillery Battalion is being forwarded by this Headquarters” (Blood for Dignity 23). These two African American artillery units formed the foundation for black artillery units during the Battle of …show more content…
Bulge. The aftermath of the “Battle of the Bulge” had some high weighing cost for both the Allied and Axis Force.
Referring more to the devastation that the US forces caused by the effective Artillery that caused so much damage to the opposing forces. As previous stated that the processing time for 22nd AFA (Armored Field Artillery) was 60 seconds which the unit was praised for their quickness of response time, but compared to today’s time standards its greatly slower. The advancement of technology has drastically changed and shaped the battle field and in the way we fight from then to now. Today’s Artillery has led to faster movement, emplacement, and shooting times then during the “Battle of the Bulge” due to the advancement of technology. During the “Battle of the Bulge” the Firing Data was Manually Computed using the FM 6-40 (Field Artillery Gunnery) which we still use Manual Gunnery methods today but it has become a secondary means to computing data with the introduction of the following fire control systems, PDFCS (Paladin Digital Fire Control System), DFCS (Digital Fire Control System), AFATDS (Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System), and High Frequency Radio’s just to name a few pieces of equipment that’s used today. What does that really mean compared to then, well it allows us to be able to talk further across the battle field and transmit digital firing data through high frequency radios then using voice which cuts down on response time and the accuracy of the
data that they’re receiving. Just imagine what the Soldiers of the “Battle of the Bulge” could have done with the today’s technology and how it could have benefited with that battle. For example, Mission Command systems like AFATDS (Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System) incorporated with systems like SNE (Soldier Network Extension) a system that is mounted on vehicles to give units on-the-move network communications to range the system from the brigade down to the battery level. Using its on-the-move satellite communication systems in a situation like the “Battle of the Bulge” a huge advantage to have. Reason being is that your headquarter elements can transfer battlefield information like geometries, enemy situation, or just an overall situational awareness of the battlefield from the Continental United States without the needs of being in the front lines. The advantage of not having an enemy combatant destroy one of your Fire Direction Centers reducing your casualties. In closing, the evolution of the field artillery from cannon, rocket, and missiles, would have made an effect on the outcome of “The Battle of the Bulge.” Its weapons have evolved to sustain the fast moving capabilities and extensive disruptions of these ground gaining arms. In the strategic and tactical complexities of the modern warfare. Some evolution capabilities range from close range support to long range, and even mobility advances compare to those in World War II. The full spectrum capabilities sustain the Field Artillery establish its reputation as one of the greatest casualty producing agencies employed in the modern battlefield.
The 2nd Brigade of 101st Airborne Division found out in the summer of 2004 that they had to prepare for the war in the Middle East more particularly for Iraq. With Colonel Todd Ebel in Command of the 2nd Division with a year to prepare over 3,400 men and woman he got right to work. Colonel Ebel started by choosing his staff and who he thought was fit to take charge and lead this ever more complicated war. It was a huge religious civil war taking place in Iraq at the time with the Sunnis at war against the Shi’ite and after the capture of Saddam insurgency started uprising immediately. This uprising along with the uprising of Muqtada al-Sadr a key leader that had lots of violent followers that soon grew into a form of a militia called Mahdi Army which became another huge problem for the U.S. because the line between a legitamite populist movement and a huge theocratic organized-crime and terror ring was a thin one. The 2nd Brigade Infantry Battalions consisted of 1-502nd (First Strike) and 2-502nd (Strike Force) and 2nd brigade as a whole is known as the “Black Hearts”. Ebel’s mission was to deny insurgent’s access to Baghdad through his AO and as intelligence increased to uproot and destroy insurgent safe havens, while also training the IA so they could ensure the stability of the region later on. Ebel chose Lt. Col. Kunk as commander of “First Strike” 1-502nd and Lt. Col. Haycock as commander of “Strike Force” 2-502nd. By Ebel’s personality evaluations of Kunk and Haycock he decided that Kunk would work in the area that involved him being more engaging where populist centers were and work with local officials and Haycock more in the fighting areas. Kunk was in command of 3 rifle companies, 1 weapons company, 1 logistics company...
The story of the “Fighting Fifty-Forth” is a true testament of how when a country is in war or a time of despair they can ban together as one ,regardless of race to achieve an objective. Although they were treated unfairly and discriminated against, the 54th regiment paved the way for equality of not only African-American soldiers but for all African-Americans.
The purpose of this paper is to perform a mission command analysis of the Battle of Gettysburg, honing in on Pickett’s Charge. The Battle of Gettysburg took place on July 1st through July 3rd in 1863 in the town of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. The belligerents were the Army of the Potomac, led by MG George G. Meade and the Army of Northern Virginia, led by GEN Robert E. Lee. The goal is to analyze the decisions of GEN Lee using the six mission command principles described in the Army Doctrine Publication 6-0 and then assess the outcome of those decisions.
Airmen of WWII Racism is part of American history and is not forgotten. The Tuskegee Airmen of WWII left their mark on the military and their influence changed history. Many events had to happen for the majority of racism, at least in the military, to change, such as a war. December 1940, the Army Air Corps planned an experiment for black aviators in an all black fighter squadron. This group would be called the 332nd fighter group and would consist of four fighter squadrons, the 99th, 100th, 301st, 302nd.
Zerby, Roy M. Interview by author, 28 March 1996. Mail questionnaire. 12th Armored Division Historical Project, Abilene Christian University, Abilene, Texas.
Many of the African American soldiers wanted to offer their skills in the war but they could not because of their skin color they had to often have kitchen duty, cleaning beds, and
In order to receive a victory in the Battle of the Bulge, General Patton used Mission Command Analysis in order to understand how he can be successful for this mission. The first thing of understanding t...
Cameron, R. S. (2003). The army vision: The 4th AD in world war II. Military Review, 83(6), 59-68
Before WORLD WAR I, military service represented a source of black pride. Black educators, clergymen, and the press frequently referred to Negro heroes of America’s past wars. After the Civil War, the U.S, Army maintained four regular Negro regiments –the 9th and 10th Calvary and the 24th and 25th Infantry. These units included veterans of the civil war and the frontier Indian fighting regiments. Retired sergeants often became respected, conservative leaders in their communities. This history set a foundation for black support and involvement in America’s future wars.
Melton, Jack W. and Lawrence E. Pawl. “Basic Facts Concerning Artillery.” Civil War Artillery. 2009. 17 January 2010. .
During the years leading up to World War I, no black man had ever served as a pilot for the United States Army, ever since the beginning of the United States Army Air Service in 1907. The Tuskegee Airmen changed this and played a huge part in the fight for African-American rights for years to come.
Keegan chooses the three well documented campaigns of Agincourt in 1415, Waterloo in 1815, and Somme in 1916 to answer the question of his thesis: To find out how men who are faced with the threat of single-missile and multiple-missile weapons control their fears, fix their wounds, and face their death. In his words he is seeking “to catch a glimpse of the face of battle.”
This project is about some of the weapons used by American soldiers during World War II. The weapons included are some of the most used and reliable used by American infantrymen throughout the war. Of all of the weapons used by American infantrymen these weapons were produced in greater quantities than others and also were favorites of the American men that used to fight in World War II. Some of these weapons were manufactured and used before World War II, but were produced and used on a larger scale in World War II. Weapon descriptions, main uses and ammunition fired from them will be discussed in the report. How they were beneficial to the American soldiers that used them will also be discussed. Some of these weapons were thought to be superior to others used by American soldiers, as well as those used by enemy forces. These weapons are unique in their own way and used by soldiers with confidence that they were going to perform as they needed them to in battle.
It is far easier for us in the present than it was for those at Gettysburg, to look back and determine the path that the leaders should have taken. As students, studying battles such as this, we have the advantage of hindsight, knowing the outcome. Nonetheless, we can still learn valuable lessons from it. To do so, this analysis will explore some of the decisions of the leaders at Gettysburg, and how they were affected by the operational variables. This essay will scrutinize some of the leaders at Gettysburg, and the impact of their actions. The outcome of this analysis will show that what was true in 1863 is still true today. While many variables are vital to a successful army on the battlefield, none should be neglected. Each variable discussed in this examination will prove to be important, but the information battle will be paramount in the battle of Gettysburg.
Blitzkrieg used speed and surprise along with highly concentrated tank corps, supported by mechanized infantry and airplanes. Warfare is in a state of transition. Older commanders and generals in the French and British militaries were very cavalry and infantry focused. These commanders believed that cavalry, infantry, and artillery would assure victory in any circumstance, against any foe. They clung to the static tactics of the bygone World War I era.