Bartleby The Scrivener Research Paper

1754 Words4 Pages

Bartleby the Scrivener: Why the Narrator Is the Problem Scholars often describe Herman Melville’s “Bartleby the Scrivener” as a tale of passive aggressive resistance, or a tale of mental illness. Readers often look to discover Bartleby’s motivations, much as the narrator does in the story; however, the problem here lies not with Bartleby. Bartleby exists on his own terms, not to defy conventions, but simply because he is who he is. The narrator, and therefore the reader, finds a need to explain “why” rather than accept Bartleby’s actions at face value. Bartleby is not mentally ill, nor does he try to be a nonconformist; Bartleby just seeks to exist. Melville shows this through Bartleby’s interactions with the narrator, both on his own terms and the narrator’s, through Bartleby’s limited interactions with others, and …show more content…

The narrator constantly attempts to explain Bartleby’s behavior through various medical explanations, thinking that his eyes hurt or he has indigestion. He constantly makes demands on Bartleby and only once comes to Bartleby on Bartleby’s terms, yet even then cannot understand the significance of this breakthrough. Both characters are doomed from the start because the narrator assumes something is wrong with Bartleby. It never seems to occur to him to try to understand Bartleby as Bartleby understands himself. Though Bartleby says, “I would prefer not to,” it is not his choices that drive him out. Because society cannot include people who do not fit this “social norm,” they are pushed to the outside of society. The story’s ending shows that when people do not fit in, they end up on the outside, alone, and eventually the die unnoticed. Yet the real tragedy is that the narrator goes on, even after Bartleby passes away, trying to understand

Open Document