Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does literature shape culture
How does literature reflect culture
How does literature shape culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Barn Burning”, a short story written by William Faulkner focuses on themes of loyalty, family, and justice set in the fictional town of Yoknapatawpha, Mississippi. Colonel Sartoris Snopes, also known as “Sarty” finds himself between a rock and a hard place when confronted with whether his loyalty lies between his family or between the justice system. Abner Snopes, the father of Sarty, causes Sarty to question his moral conscious in whether to tell truth. William Faulkner,illustrates a complicated relationship between father and son who have different belief systems, which ultimately questions, is blood thick than water? In this case blood isn’t always thicker than water because although Sarty was Abners son, Sarty should not have been obligated to lie for his father’s wrong doings. Faulkner sets in the story in the Peace’s court …show more content…
where Abner Snopes is faced with the allegations of burning down Mr.
Harris’s barn. The judge summons Sarty and says, “I reckon anybody named for Colonel Sartoris in this country can’t help but tell the truth, can they” (406). It is here that Sarty knows more than what he lets known to the justice system. The judge orders that the family leaves the county. After court and the night has settled Abner voiced harshly, “You’re were fixing to tell them. You would have told him” (408). Abner realizes that Sarty’s loyalty is very questionable and that he is supposed to stick by his family if not he won’t have any to stick by. Within the next few days of leaving the county the Snopes move into their new home in which Sarty and Abner have a confrontation with their new neighbor Major De Spain. This confrontation is caused by Abner and Sarty ruining De Spain’s rug with manure, in which De Spain wanted cleaned and returned
to its original condition. However, the Snopes failed to clean the rug properly resulting in De Spain wanting twenty bushels of corn in return. Abner Snopes finds himself in court again, in which the judge reduces the number of bushels of corn to ten bushels of corn. After the Snopes ate dinner Abner gathered all the kerosene he could get his hands on and commanded Sarty to get him more, because of Sarty’s questionable behavior he orders his wife Lennie to hold him. Abner goes to burn Major De Spain’s barn with kerosene in tow. Sarty, on the other hand, breaks free from his mother grasp and run to warn De Spain of his father’s plot of revenge. Before Abner can carry out his plans he is shot down and dies. Sarty mourns the loss of his father and sets into the woods and never looks back.
At first glance, the story “Barn burning” seems just to be about a tyrannical father and a son who is in the grips of that tyranny. I think Faulkner explores at least one important philosophical question in this story were he asks at what point should a person make a choice between what his parent(s) and / or family believes and his own values?
The nature of the relationship between father and son in William Faulkner's Barn Burning is displayed in the first paragraph of the story. In general a father-son relationship would be built on genuine respect, love, loyalty, and admiration. These building blocks were absent in Abner and Sarty Snopes relationship. Sarty's loyalty to his father appeared to come from a long time fear of the consequences of not obeying his father's commands. The "nigger" that could place the blame on Abner was not to be found. Was Faulkner inferring by this statement that the individual had been killed? If Abner had so little moral value to destroy a man's property, surely to protect himself from persecution he could destroy a man's life.
“Barn Burning” and The Unvanquished present very different ways to tell a story. In “Barn Burning,” Faulkner uses a third person, limited omniscient point of view that allows him to enter the mind of the story’s protagonist, Colonel Sartoris Snopes. In this point of view, the narrator establishes that the story took place in the past by commenting that “Later, twenty years later, he was too tell himself, ‘If I had said they wanted only truth, justice, he would have it me again.’ But now he said nothing” (8). The narrator of “Barn Burning” develops Colonel Sartoris as a child by describing his relationship with his father; no matter how many times Ab Snopes burns a barn or strikes his son, Colonel Sartoris wants to believe in his father’s goodness and potential for change.
In ¡§Barn Burning¡¨, Sarty¡¦s father enjoys setting fires to burn down others¡¦ properties. Sarty faces the problem between loyalty and honesty. On one hand, he wants to be loyal to his father; on the other hand, he does not endorse his father¡¦s behavior. His father teaches him: ¡§You¡¦re getting to be a man. You got to learn. You got to learn to stick to your own blood or you ain¡¦t going to have any blood to stick to you¡¨ (¡§Barn Burning¡¨, 8). His father wa...
Sarty’s father, Abner Snopes is accused of burning down a barn and Sarty is called upon to testify against his father and to tell the events of what happened. He wants to tell the truth because it is the right thing to do, but he knows he might have lie to save his father from being reprimanded. To his relief, it is decided that Sarty will not have to testify and is dismissed from testifying. It is decided by the Justice of the Peace to order Abner and his family to leave town at once.
William Faulkner was an outstanding American writer, also a Nobel Prize laureate from Oxford Mississippi. “Barn Burning” was one of many short stories Faulkner wrote. In the story the main character, Colonel Sartoris Snopes (Sarty) is forced to choose between two loyalties he beholds as he matures into adulthood. “Maybe it will all add up and balance and vanish – corn, rug, fire; the terror and grief, the being pulled two ways like between two teams of horses - gone, done with for ever and ever” (Faulkner 7). This quote occurs after Major de Spain has informed Snopes that he owes twenty additional bushels of corn for destroying the rug. Faulkner expresses the lack of peace in Sarty’s life; he is overwhelmed by his father’s transgressions. The peace he feels on the de Spain property is quickly replaced by the unsettling, dark-coated figure of this father arriving to dismay the home. Sarty is torn between the loyalty he has with his father and family with the loyalty he has with the law. As he starts to mature into adulthood he begins to see the hurt and pain his father is causing other people. He realizes at the end o...
In the short story “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner, there are two major characters, Sarty who is the narrator and the protagonist, and Abner who is also his father and the antagonist. Abner Snopes is a poor man, with nothing of value, he is a serial arsonist and is known for his fierce wolf-like independence personality which is feared by his family including Sarty, Abner feel he must lash out at the world out of spite and if he been wronged in anyway regardless his fault he will retaliate through arson. This essay will focus on how social class strongly shape and influences Abner choices and actions.
In “Barn Burning,” the theme of loyalty and betrayal contribute greatly to the main conflict of the short story. Abner expects his son to stand wholeheartedly by his actions, right or wrong. Abner assumes that a blood relation entitles him to a lifetime of support, disregarding what his young son may be experiencing. He attempts to train Sarty to build his morals around loyalty to his family, but in reality Abner only wants Sarty to remain loyal to him. Faulkner writes in “Barn Burning,” “you got to learn to stick by your own blood or you ain’t going to have any blood to stick by you,” (Faulkner 4). However, Sarty’s conscience is far too heavy to believe this statement. In Short Stories for Students the editor states, “...Sarty expresses his real loyalty to normative ethics, in which revenge is an aberration and aggressive violence is a sin,” (Akers and Moore 8). Sadly, Sarty is forced to make a choice between his father and morals, and morals win.
Through the heat of the fire the young boy has been changed forever. In William Faulkner’s “Barn Burning”, Abner, Sarty’s father, has a tendency of burning buildings which causes Sarty to change his way of life. Colonel Sartoris Snopes experiences many changes in his life starting as an obedient child to a confused boy and ending as an independent man.
Colonel Sartoris "Sarty" Snopes is a young boy who carries within himself an enormous burden. In William Faulkner's short story "Barn Burning", the protagonist is caught between the need for justice; the fear of a patriarch and the bonds of blood. Sarty knows the secrets of his father; he has no respect for authority, going so far as to burn down his employer's barn when he feels slighted. It takes courage to do the right thing in the face of adversity; to overcome the feelings of devotion to family and the apprehension of defying his father.
In his story “Barn Burning,” William Faulkner portrays how Sarty must choose between being utterly loyal to his father and choosing his own path to manhood. Abner embodies a powerful presence in Sarty's life as he appears to wield all power and control in his life. His desire to maintain control over Sarty is reflected in the symbol of fire. Fire symbolizes Abner's ability to forge a feeling of total dominance from the fires he builds. It also symbolizes his desire to violently impose his will on Sarty as he prevents him from feeling independent. The symbol of spring is based on how Sarty's path toward adulthood is reflected in the cycle of renewal that spring embodies. With spring comes Sarty's sense of redemption and growth as he becomes a man. The two symbols reflect how the relationship between Abner and
In “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner, Sartoris Snopes is faced with the issue of doing what he thinks is right for society, or allowing his father to continue doing what he knows is wrong. Most people are infused with a sense of familial moral obligation, and with characterization, the effects of sharecropping, and symbolism, Faulkner shows how the right choice is not always the easy choice when it comes to choosing between your family and society.
The “Barn Burning” opens in a convenient store in the country, which seems to also be a Justice of Peace Court. The narrator, a hungry boy, named Sarty craves the meat and cheese displayed in the store. While his father, Abner Snopes, is in court, being accused of setting fire and burning down Mr. Harris’ barn. Sarty is being called up to testify against his own father. It soon dawns on him that he will have to testify and tell the judge that his father did not burn down the barn. Mr. Harris and the Justice apprehend that they are putting the hound child in an extremely tough position and they let him off the hook. The Judge tells Mr.Snopes to leave the
“Barn Burning” by William Faulkner is a short story set in the South in the 1930’s around the time period known as the Great Depression. During this time period Southern families belonged to one of the three social entities; the privileged white land owning families, the extremely poor white tenant farmers, and the enslaved blacks that worked for the wealthy land owners. “Barn Burning” focuses mainly on the injustices of a sharecropper named Abner Snopes. Snopes was a harsh man characterized by the poor white tenant farmer social class which he and his family were members. The lack of fairness exhibited in the mind of Abner Snopes through his actions in “Barn Burning” can be used to identify the
“Barn Burning” first appeared in print in Harper’s Magazine in 1939 (Pinion). It is a short story by William Faulkner which depicts a young boy in crisis as he comes to realize the truth about his father’s pyromania. Faulkner takes the reader inside the boy’s life as he struggles to remain loyal to his unstable father. In the end the boy’s courage and sense of justice wins and he not only walks away from his father’s iron clad control over his life, but he is able to warn his father’s next victim. To understand how this boy could make such a courageous, difficult decision we must review the important events in the story and the effect they have on him.