Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about academic freedom
For and against censorship of books
Argumentative text essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What does it mean to ban a book? A banned book is one that has been removed from the shelves of a library, bookstore, or classroom because of its controversial content. (About.com) Before banning, a book must be challenged. A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, based upon the objections of a person or group. (About Banned And Challenged Books) A book is challenged when a person or group dislikes some of its content, and wishes to have it removed. Often times, it is banned for obscenities and is considered unsuited for the set age group, or any age group. The Perks Of Being A Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky has been banned and challenged for many years and for a multitude of reasons. It has been challenged every year since it’s release in different locations. The Perks Of Being A Wallflower was challenged for: drugs, alcohol, the glorification of drugs and alcohol, smoking, homosexuality, offensive …show more content…
language, sexually explicit content, masturbation, date rape, abuse, bestiality, and over all being considered unsuited for it’s age group. The Perks Of Being A Wallflower has several scenes involving drug and alcohol abuse among teens and adults. Some quotes from the novel supporting the claims of drug abuse and glorification are: “Things were worse an hour ago, and I was looking at this tree but it was a dragon and then a tree, and I remembered that one nice pretty weather day when I was part of the air.” (Chbosky 94) This quote refers to the main character, Charlie, tripping on LSD. there were several more incidents with LSD, many ending up poorly. “After a week of not talking to anyone, I finally called Bob. [...] He said he had a quarter ounce of pot left. So, I took some of my Easter money and bought it. I've been smoking it all the time since.” (Chbosky 139) This refers to Charlie buying marijuana from his friend, which was rather common. Some examples of alcohol abuse are: “My aunt Helen drank a lot. My aunt Helen took drugs a lot. My aunt Helen had many problems with men and boys.” (Chbosky 90) and “Patrick and I have been spending a lot of time together. We drink a lot. Actually, it's more like Patrick drinks, and I sip.” (Chbosky 161); both telling about alcohol abuse involving family and friends of the main character. There are also several references to cigarette smoking in the novel. “'Can I have a cigarette?' I said. I couldn't bring myself to say 'bum a smoke.' Not for my first one. I just couldn't. 'Sure,' said Patrick.” (Chbosky 101) This was a very significant moment because before this scene Charlie had a panic attack and wanted to smoke to “calm down”. The scene becomes more significant after the quote: "I'm now up to about ten cigarettes a day." (Chbosky 103) It is important because it shows the addiction forming. The Perks Of Being A Wallflower contains depictions of homosexuality, masturbation, date-rape, molestation, bestiality, as well as other sexually explicit material. Charlie’s best friend Patrick is gay and experiences a lot of turmoil because of it, even from his partner. As shown in this quote, Patrick’s lover Brad had a very difficult time coming to terms with his sexuality and tried his best to deny it. “Brad's parents never did figure out why their son was getting stoned and drunk all the time. Neither did anybody else. Except the people who knew. I asked Patrick if he felt sad that he had to keep it a secret, and Patrick just said that he wasn't sad because at least for now, Brad doesn't have to get drunk or stoned to make love.” (Chbosky 43) Even after Brad left Patrick, more conflicts arose regarding homosexuality and the bullying associated with it. Some of said bullying was inflicted by Brad. Charlie finds an interest in mastuabation and writes a lot about it. These paragraphs sparked many debates on the book’s appropriateness. “Do you know what ‘masturbation’ is? I think you probably do because you are older than me. But just in case, I will tell you. Masturbation is when you rub your genitals until you have an orgasm. Wow! I thought that in those movies and television shows when they talk about having a coffee break that they should have a masturbation break. But then again, I think this would decrease productivity.” (Chbosky 21) In this quote, Charlie explains his first ventures with touching himself, but wait- there’s more. “I guess I forgot to mention in my last letter that it was Patrick who told me about masturbation. I guess I forgot to tell you how often I do it now, which is a lot. I don't like to look at pictures. I just close my eyes and dream about a lady I do not know. And I try not to feel ashamed....One night, I felt so guilty that I promised God that I would never do it again. So, I started using blankets, but then the blankets hurt, so I started using pillows, but then the pillows hurt, so I went back to the normal way.”(Chbosky 27) Charlie mentions it a few more times, but none as notable as these. Also found in the beginning of the novel, Charlie witnesses date-rape in his own bedroom. His brother was throwing a party and forced him to stay in his room, and drunk couple made their way in. The following took place a few minutes in, when the boy forced himself upon his girlfriend. “After a few minutes, the boy pushed the girl's head down, and she started to kiss his penis. She was still crying. Finally, she stopped crying because he put his penis in her mouth, and I don't think you can cry in that position. I had to stop watching at that point because I started to feel sick, but it kept going on, and they kept doing other things, and she kept saying "no." Even when I covered my ears, I could still hear her say that.” (Chbosky 31) This event traumatized Charlie and stuck with him for many years. Charlie was molested by his aunt Helen at young age and had repressed the memories for years. He didn’t realize the truth until he was having his “first time” with sam and she touched him. “It was like everything made sense. Until she moved her hand under my pants, and she touched me.” (Charlie begins to cry, and Sam asks if she hurt him. He says no, and that he has to go home.) “It felt good actually. [But] I didn't know what was wrong. (Chbosky 51-54) Later, he then says: “I kind of figured out that everything I dreamt about my aunt Helen was true.” Showing his realization that he had been molested throughout his childhood. Not just was he molested, but his aunt helen was his favorite, and most trusted person. It is unnecessary to quote all of the incidents with sexually explicit material because of how many quotes there would be. They range from homosexual, heterosexual, and bestiality. Homosexual interactions occurred between Brad and Patrick, as well as one incident between Charlie and Patrick. “When most people left, Brad and Patrick went into Patrick's room. They had sex for the first time that night. I don't want to go into detail about it, because it's pretty private stuff, but I will say that Brad assumed the role of the girl in terms of where you put things. I think that's pretty important to tell you. When they were finished, Brad started to cry really hard. He had been drinking a lot. And getting really stoned.” (Chbosky 44) There are very detailed heterosexual sex scenes between Charlie’s sister and her boyfriend. “And I opened the door to the basement, and my sister and this boy were naked. He was on top of her, and her legs were draped over either side of the couch.” (Chbosky 12) Can’t forget bestiality, which is mentioned here: “There was a guy named Carl Burns and everyone called him C.B. And one day C.B. got so drunk at a party that he tried to "fuck" the host's dog.” (Chbosky 159) Lastly, The Perks Of Being A Wallflower was challenged for its “ colorful” wording. Two examples are the quotes: "What the fuck is wrong with you” (Chbosky 136). Which leads to: "And I thought Brad was fucked-up. Jesus" (Chbosky 136). There are many more examples of obscene language throughout the novel. After listing out all the reasons for banning the novel, one might have a biased opinion leaning towards it.
However, this book absolutely should not be banned. The Perks Of Being A Wallflower has depth. It isn’t like the cheesy high school movies you’d see on disney channel, it’s more real. It shows what actual high school is like and addresses real problems that students face. Many of the justifications for the banning were parents saying they didn’t want their kid exposed to the obscenities, but realistically speaking, their kid probably already has been. They will find out from friends or the internet either way, so why not let them read about it and learn? Suicide was also mentioned several times throughout the novel, and was another reason for its discomfort among parents. This is another thing very prominent in high school, and it often goes unspoken of; and as time goes on, middle schoolers will experience this too. The Perks Of Being A Wallflower should not be banned because it is realistic and touching, not to mention an
eye-opener.
After finishing the book, this book should not be in the banned books. This book has strong language for a younger child to read. it shows what can happen to teenagers, what students will do with drugs, and it has a strong message for older teens. For younger readers, this book carries very strong language but it has a strong message. One of those is that it shows what students will do with drugs.
There are multiple reasons why a book can be banned or challenged. Book banning causes the removal of materials in schools and libraries due to “inappropriate” content. The Lovely Bones, by Alice Sebold, was banned due to sexual content and language.
Despite being a worldwide best seller, J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye has been on the banned books list since 1961 ( (Baldassarro). The Catcher in the Rye tells the short journey, of anti-hero Holden Caulfield, between the end of the fall semester and Christmas break (Salinger). The story begins when Holden is expelled from his school, Pency Prep, for failing a majority of his classes (Salinger). Holden knows he must return home, so he attempts to prolong the scolding he will receive from his parents, for being expelled, by venturing around Manhattan until it becomes necessary to return to his home (Salinger). Holden tells his story in the most vulgar way possible. Holden accounts being offered a prostitute by an elevator operator when he asks, “Innarested a little tail t’night?” (Salinger 91). Offensive language is also used throughout the book, for example, “You’re a dirty stupid sonuvabitch of a moron” (Salinger 44). Underage drinking is also one of Holden’s favorite passtimes as evident in the quote, “I ordered a scotch and soda, and told him not to mix it- I said it fast as hell, because if you hem and haw, they think you’re under twenty-one and won’t sell you any intoxicating liquor” (Salinger 69). These three quotes express the precise justifications for banning books: sexually explicit content, offensive language, and underage drug use (Association). Although, many consider The Catcher in the Rye to be morally wrong, it should not ...
With the thought that someone can be hurt by reading a book, people will try to challenge and ban them. To ban a book is to have it restricted from a certain age or audience. Banning and challenging books is trying to keep a certain book away from an audience due to sexual content, going against religious beliefs, language and vulgarity, violence, drugs, self-harm, racism, occult/satanic views, promoting gangs, and going against community standards. An argument from someone who believes books should not be banned is that it is important for the age group to learn about certain content and material as they grow up. Due to controversial content, the novel The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald should be banned.
The Catcher in the Rye Should Not be Banned. & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Since its publication in 1951, The Catcher In the Rye, written by J.D. Salinger has served as a conflagration for debate and extreme controversy. Although the novel has been the target of scornful criticism, it has also been the topic of wide discussion. The novel portrays the life of sixteen year old, Holden Caufield. Currently in psychiatric care, Holden recalls what happened to him last Christmas.
The Perks of Being a Wallflower, by Stephen Chbosky, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, The Giver, by Lois Lowry, To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, Harry Potter, by J.K. Rowlings, The Kite Runner, by Khaled Hossenini, what do these books have in common? They are books on the American Library Association’s list of top 100 Banned/Challenged Books: 2000-2009. For various reasons, these books were found unsuitable for public audiences, and an attempt was made to ban them. From profanity to sexual content to homosexuality, groups have found reasons to challenge the books. Banning books that some people deem inappropriate from high school libraries underrates youthful intelligence, clouds history and dilutes our culture to fit a mold of conformity. Schools, even religiously affiliated ones, should focus on education and actually encouraging their students to read rather than inhibiting them from using their
What is a banned book? A banned book is a book that has been removed from the shelves; it could be from a library, classroom, or even the bookstore because of its content. A book could be banned for many reasons, but it could be banned because it contains sex, violence, inappropriate language, religious viewpoints, witch craft, and many more things because other people deem it inappropriate. When someone bans a book they ban it for everyone else too.
Why should this novel be banned from use in schools? Students should be able to hear these words and talk about them and not use them offensively. Racial content, tension, and slurs are used in people’s everyday lives. If people can use these words outside of school why would they not be allowed to be talked about in school? It is important for everyone to be informed about these racial tensions. This book also shows the reader what is was like to be growing up in this time period. Although this book uses the n-word, it uses it in a historical way. Using these racist words explains the way of thinking of the south in the 1930s. To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee is appropriate to use and read in school.
There is a difference between banned books and challenged books. According to the American Library Association (ALA), “A challenge is an attempt to remove or restrict materials, based upon the objections of a person or group (About banned, para. 2). A banned book is when a book or other reading material is removed from certain locations and not available. For example, one of the most challenged books in the 21st century is The Giver by Lois Lowry (100 Most). The novel, The Absolutely True Story of a Part-Time Indian by Sheman Alexie was banned in high school in Oregon because a parent complained that the book was offensive (Doyle, 3).
There are many reasons that violence is one of the reasons that the book has been banned. “He determined to strand me outside district 12 until he can apprehend to arrest me? Drag me to the square to be locked in a stockade or whipped or hanged?” (Collins 151). This isn’t really a strong bloody gory violence that would cause a student to get sick in class it’s a basic violence that you would see in any other book that involves killing and fighting. And by exposing this type of violence to children it will raise their maturity level and have the children comprehend that there is violence around them in the world and they’re going to have to learn to deal with it. 56% of the book is challenged by parents and only 13% by libraries. This tells the reader that parents have a more difficult time with the book so you ask yourself is it more of the parents why they see the book? Or is it their child’s way they see the book? both child and parents are going to see the book differently so children may like the violence in the book but the parents may say th...
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
To ban a book is to remove it from a library or from other sources such as online websites. A book is evicted by dense communities of people and can only be banned for reasons deemed unfit such as being: “politically incorrect, containing sexual subjects; and(or) talk of extreme racial tensions” or explicit violence (Downs and Sweet). An example of a banned book is Black Boy, which contains vulgar language, crude depictions which drove people of certain communities to evict it from High School libraries. It was banned in Mississippi 1945, by a senator who was so religiously biased that a book questioning God and a book that contains vulgar language should not be allowed to be read by teenagers of the Mississippi community
Is it possible to talk about the good of this issue? In my opinion I find it as a way of teaching children who are soon to be teens what growing up means. It clearly explains that Lucky, the character in the book, is preparing herself to be a grown up. I personally find this as a good idea to slowly teach pre-teens of the body as they get older. So why ban the book? Ms. Patron clearly states that the book is aimed for children from nine to twelve years old. From my understanding these are about the last two years of elementary school and the start of your first year in middle school. There’s nothing bad about writing a book about growing up that is aimed at a young audience who can learn from it. One way I can relate this is with a health class in high school. The teachers in a health class will talk about and show pictures of sexually transmitted diseases. Does that mean that other teachers can go and complain about it? Well yes they can but they cannot start a petition to ban the class from schools. I understand that i...
Overall Blubber should continue to be banned do to the excessiveness of bullying and awful language. There is some literary merit to the book but that doesn't overrule all of the bad parts. When a student reads this book the majority of the feedback will be in agreement with my thesis. After studying a little bit into banned books and censorship I learned that it takes a lot to ban a book anywhere. Trying to get a majority of people to ban a book will take a while, and if the book does eventually gets banned the supervisor can know that the book had to have a lot of bad aspects to it. After reading the book personally I felt as if there was no way that this book could be acceptable to any student from middle school to high school.
Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe. The Houston Chronicle, pp.C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database.