Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion on why banning books
Literature and its impact on society
Literature and its impact on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion on why banning books
Stop banning books only because they bother you.Books create a unique perspective of the world. Reading can raise your grammar and vocabulary exceedingly. Imagination is a big part of kids lives.
Kids would have a chance to see everything from a different point of view and censoring them from “bad language” will not help.“Books are a portal to different life experiences and reading encourages empathy and social-emotional development.”
(“Banned Books”) The quote means books will open kids up to adventures that they can face on their own. Banning books will lose that effect. When reading many emotions come into play and it just helps you for real life issues and all of those emotions develop over time.
“Protecting” children from the difficult realities of the world is an exercise in futility—and privilege. (“10 Reasons for Banning Books, and 5 Much Better Reasons Not To”)
Books will introduce them to the fun parts of the world or their imagination. They will also show them the difficult realities as well, but it makes them stronger in their thoughts, opinions, and how they see things. In conclusion, when a book has bad language don’t have it banned because other people enjoy certain books that become banned because of one word.
…show more content…
If readers don’t get a chance to comprehend new vocabulary, they won’t exceed in grammar and will feel uneducated.“It keeps people from progress and development.” (“Cons”)Books have a great source of grammar and they can offer many sources of education without even noticing.
Without seeing the many different kinds of vocabulary and spellings kids won’t learn any of it.“Books are among our best teachers” (“Leigh”).No matter how qualified our teachers are, books will always be able to give us different point of views and advice that teachers can’t. Reading a book is more entertaining then sitting in a classroom for an hour.To conclude this paragraph, books are a great source of literature and vocab to not only kids but teens, and adults as
well. Banning books will hide the real world from students and they won’t be able to explore their imagination.For example, “It deprives people of the opportunity to think, question and explore” (“Lombardo”) Kids already have an imagination but books can cause that to come alive, because of all the different varieties of books to choose from. If children don’t have books then they can just have an excuse to be encased in their phone. It deprives people of learning about the world around them” (“Lombardo”). Most authors write different genres but they’re still real life problems or real life examples of something that actually happened. These real world references can show people how to deal with the world around them or people around them. Books have a great influence on many lives. In conclusion that when books are banned kids don’t have a source of imagination that they can start reading and immediately be in sync with the book. To conclude this paper, banning books is illogical and we need to stop doing it.It is out of line and needs to be taken care of.Banning books takes away knowledge that can be picked up from any book. It takes away imagination that are in books that all kids enjoy reading. Lastly, it only please the one who chose to get that book banned. Banning books isn’t solving anything, most children will hear even worse language and behavior with friends, at school, or even in public.
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
When authors write books, the books are meant to be read not banned. Authors write books to be read, so when schools and other facilities are banning books it’s taking away the author’s right. In the letter, I am Very Real written by author Kurt Vonnegut, he states “If you were to bother to read my books, to behave as educated persons would, you would learn that they are not sexy, and do not argue in favor of wildness of any kind. They beg that people be kinder and more responsible than they often are.” This excerpt from the text states that the author doesn’t write books to teach cruel things. Vonnegut writes books in a kind manner with the idea that people become more
...s and classrooms should have a wide variety of books available with varying styles of writing and art work. In addition to the books, the children should be given a variety of ways in which to express their thoughts and feelings about these books, either through discussion, writing, or their own art work. I agree because this could only allow children to enjoy reading more and lets them feel like their opinions matter and are appreciated. Having books readily available only increases a child’s desire to read and creates in him or her a love for books that, hopefully, never goes away.
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature, which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States. The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) defines censorship as: “The removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic, or educational materials. of images, ideas, and information.on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of standards applied by the censor” (Miner 1998). In schools there are three types of censorship, one type is a “parent” who doesn’t want their child to read a particular book. Another is a parent, teacher, administrator, or school board member who argues that no one in the class, or school, should read the book in dispute.
Something else that must be mentioned in order to understand the evils of school censorship are facts censors ignore; the first being literary quality. When they chose to censor a book they do not take into account the educational value of the book. How can one say a book does not belong in schools if they do not know what lessons it teaches? The second key element ignored is the manner in which teachers lead students to interact with texts. They g...
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
We live in an overprotective society, where people try to control other people’s lives from things that they find explicit. Many parents believe that by sheltering their kids from offensive things it will keep them safe. But, trying to live life as if there is always sunshine and no rain turns out to be a big disappointment. The banning of books has a negative effect on children and adults alike, as it can shelter children from real life situations, and revokes the rights of the people. Although people believe in banning books that contain vulgar language and profanity to help their children, it can actually hurt the child and can be considered unconstitutional.
But they don't know that by reading it they are "indulging in sinful and Godless acts" or that these books are putting them on the fastest train to Hell. I own A Clockwork Orange, Lord of the Flies, To Kill a Mockingbird, Twelfth Night, and Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, all of which have been or are banned. What's going on here? & nbsp; The most frequently challenged and/or banned books in 2001 were: & nbsp;
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
Walt Whitman once said, “The dirtiest book of all is the expurgated book.” Between the years 2000 and 2009 a total of 3200 books were challenged in school libraries in an attempt to expurgate, or censor, the content in books provided to students. Today the trend of censorship continues as popular novels such as The Hunger Games, The Fault in Our Stars, and Captain Underpants are censored from schools across the nation (Challenges by Reason).Censorship in regards to literature refers to the examination and suppressing of a book because of objectionable material. The process of censorship in school libraries often begins with an outspoken parent, teacher, student, or administrator and ends in the banning or abridgement of a novel deemed inadmissible. Censorship is protecting many students from controversial, immoral, and potentially unsuitable content; however, this is not always the case. Students, parents, teachers, and administrators with different backgrounds, beliefs, and morals are not creating a library pleasing to everyone because of the variety of opinion. Censorship in school is not justifiable, because it restricts discussion and knowledge of new, controversial, and necessary ideas, allows a handful of people to make decisions for a larger group based on opinion, and undermines democratic ideals.
The Houston Chronicle, pp. C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article emphasizes the point that censors go too far when they attempt to not only ban a book for their own children but want to remove it altogether from a school library, so that other students cannot read it.
The lessons taught to children by the puritanical books, though, were far from the rudimentary ideas that I had of teaching children morality through gentle children’s books. An insight that I gained from reading West’s article Teaching Banned Children’s Books was that Children’s literature as a genre is much more powerful than what I gave it credit for. In fact, the idea of children’s literature lacking power as a genre because the wording is simple is far from true. Children’s literature elicits many strong emotions and draws critics because of the types of ideas that the genre exposes young minds to. West introduces that censorship is used in children’s literature to prevent children from being exposed to ideas that are too controversial, challenge authority, contained sexuality, described violent acts, and address social problems (West,1).
9 out of 10 books banned are issued by parents who feel like they are in control. The book Animal Farm is a great example of a banned book that is very important to some aspects of history. Just like in Animal Farm other books are banned, we have the right to read what we want. Book banning doesn't mean that you are in control, in fact, it can sometimes only make it worse. Books are banned all the time for different reasons, but why we need to stop banning them is the purpose of this essay.
The banning of books has now become a common policy in the US. Books are becoming banned for numerous reasons that some people might view as dumb or irrelevant. Many authors think that censorship is unfair and “Writers want to talk about creation, and censorship is anti-creation, negative energy, or uncreation…”(Rushdie 2017). When books become banned they are considered a violation to the first amendment by restricting what it is considered the authors freedom of speech. Censorship is also known for intruding art.