Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Industrial pollution and its effects
Impact of the american industrial revolution pollution today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Industrial pollution and its effects
1. The overall mission of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is “to protect human health and environment” (EPA, 2017). One of the main jobs of the EPA is to implement environmental laws written by congress by writing regulations. The EPA sets nationwide standards that states and their regulations and the enforcement of them. In order to successfully regulate environmental laws, the EPA helps educate companies of the requirements. The EPA overviews the enforcement of The Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act is a comprehensive federal law which regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources (EPA, 2017). The Clean Air Act authorizes the EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) in order to protect …show more content…
The EPA also monitors numerous other toxic pollutants in order to improve the health of United States citizens and ensure them that they live in a safe country. After the establishment of The EPA and Clean Air Act in 1990, the EPA has greatly helped in the amendment of The Clean Air Act in 1977. The 1977 amendment was created to further enforce NAAQSs and make them more easily attainable. (EPA, 2017) The act was amended again in 1990 once the EPA began to understand the dangers related to industrial pollution. The amendment set a goal of protecting the ozone layer, reducing acid rain as well as other related toxic pollutants, and improving air quality and visibility. In order to enforce the regulations created by congress, the EPA commonly becomes involved in law cases stating the regulations and punishments for businesses and individuals not following rules set forth by the Clean Air Act. (EPA, …show more content…
Trump has already started cutting programs aimed at slowing climate change and improving water and air quality. Trump’s budget cuts for the EPA will ultimately eliminated 3,000 U.S. jobs and eliminating an estimated 19% of the EPA’s total staff (Letzter, 2017). With the recent change in presidential administration, Trump has recently appointed the new head of the EPA Scott Pruitt. Pruitt is a former state attorney general for Oklahoma, and has actually gone against EPA emission regulations in the past. Pruitt’s beliefs change the overall perception of the EPA. Although the EPA has been very focused on anthropogenic climate change studies in the past, Pruitt does not believe in anthropogenic climate change. His beliefs are already reshaping the importance of climate change to the EPA. Overall, Trump will cut the EPA’s annual budget from about 8.2 billion dollars to 6.1 billion dollars. These cuts will lead to a lack of funding for many projects currently in place in the Great Lakes, San Francisco Bay, Chesapeake Bay, Puget Sound, and the Gulf of Mexico (Letzter, 2017). All of these projects are related to the study of air and water quality around the country. Ultimately, Trump’s EPA budget cut will also lead to less power for the EPA to monitor and enforcement compliance with environmental laws and will
People need to reduce the use of carbon footprints because many companies like Exxon and Keystone XL did their dirty business that effect public health and environment. Political campaigns are part of the effect in global warming because they promise to go green but never make an effort. Obama forced to solve climate but fail to do so in 2008. Obama signed a billion that support teams of energy advisors and control carbon emissions. According to Derber, big business did not support the bill and tried to get rid of it. Fracking is a process used by fossil fuel companies to extract oil and gas from shale or other deep rocks. There was a movement against fracking lead by Jill Wiener who fought for 5 years to keep fracking legalized in New York and some people were arrested in the White house for
The classic command and control system of the Clean Air Act focuses on controlling pollution in the air to a minimum level. There are three types of standards within the command and control system, which include ambient, emission, and technology. Ambient standards regulate the pollution around a surrounding area of an environment. Emission standards regulate emissions level allowed. Technology standards require certain techniques, technologies, and practices to be used. (Command and Control)
The Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970, which established nationwide standards for air quality, is one such “unfounded mandate.” Although it is a federal law, states must pay the cost of implementation and enforcement.
Kenneth Schiff wrote an editorial for the Marine Pollution Bulletin in 2014 where he asked environmental scientist about the effectiveness of the Clean Water Act. Three topics were discussed to support their approval; The Cuyahoga River, Platform A and declines in marine life. The Cuyahoga River in Ohio had hit a point 1969 where there was so much oil on the surface of that it caught on fire and now it has been deemed as fishable by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, thanks to the Clean Water Act. Platform A was located in Southern California. In 1969, an explosion occurred, causing 100,000 barrels of oil to devastate beaches along the Pacific Ocean and kill thousands of animals located in this region. Also discussed was the effects of hazardous substances, in this example DDT, on marine life. The use of this pesticide caused brown pelicans and California sea lions to experience intense decline in population- thanks to the Clean Water Act being followed by much research, restrictions and bans were able to be placed on these chemicals, allowing these populations to flourish once more. Within this editorial, there is also many who state that this Act has not been effective enough. One big argument is that the EPA has a list of pollutants that has not changed since the 1970’s yet in the last 40 years, there has
The quality of air we intake on a daily basis is essential to our health, therefore, the EPA’s Clean Air Act provides the groundwork to support the quality of the air which we breathe. One of the goals of the Act was to set and achieve NAAQS in every state by 1975 to address the public health and welfare risks posed by certain air pollutants. The setting of these pollutant standards was coupled with directing the states to develop state implementation plans (SIPs), applicable to appropriate industrial sources in the stat...
They enforce the proper disposal of waste material, the restrictions on greenhouse emissions, pollutants, and other substances harmful to land, water, and our atmosphere. I do support the EPA because it is protecting the very environment that we need to live in. The EPA was created to protect human health and the environment by writing and enforcing regulations based on the laws passed by the Congress. I believe that the EPA is necessary, but it does come at a cost. With the EPA, businesses are forced to follow strict guidelines. This comes at a monetary cost that can sometimes cost a great deal of money. This in turn makes the products they produce more expensive for consumer. Overall, I do believe that the EPA and all the rules and regulations they enforce are worth the price at which they are given. Another modern example of government regulations on businesses is sticker shock. Sticker shock is a about fuel economy standards. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the EPA finalized new fuel efficiency standards for cars and light truck for the year 2017-2025. They are requiring the average fuel economy be 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. Although this would be great, I don’t think that it is realistic. The sticker price for cars will dramatically increase, and ultimately have a negative effect on the overall economy. I don’t support this regulation as it is unfair and unjust to set
The Clean Air Act began with the Air Pollution Control Act, which was created in 1955, after many state and local governments were disgruntled with dealing about air pollution. Therefore, the federal government decided to pass legislation to manage the problem on a national scale. The Act was intended to provide research and technical assistance relating to air pollution. In 1963 Congress yet again passed another Act, which we know of today as the Clean Air Act to “improve, strengthen, and accelerate programs for the prevention and abatement of air pollution” (American Meteorological Society).
Our Congress created the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1969 in order to establish an environmental foundation for mankind. This policy endorses harmony between humans and the vast ecosystems surrounding them. To obtain this goal and provide our future with resources as well, NEPA is separated into two titles. The first title declares the policy in detail while the second title focuses on the Council on Environmental Quality. The CEQ oversees the effectiveness of current methods, the reactions of the environment to those methods, and implements revisions as necessary.
First off, let’s talk about what exactly an EPA is and how it started. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or sometimes USEPA) is an agency of the U.S. federal government which was created for the purpose of protecting human health and the environment by writing and enforcing regulations based on laws passed by Congress. The EPA was proposed by President
The EPA was established for the purpose of, according to Rodrigues & Cusick (2012), “enable[ing] coordinated and effective government action on behalf of the environment.” OSHA’s mission is to assure safe and healthful working conditions. . . [by] setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education and assistance (OSHA, 2015). In the field of aviation, the EPA seeks to reduce harm to the environment by reducing aircraft noise, pollution caused by aircraft engines, and the amount of hazardous chemicals used in the everyday operation of aircraft. OSHA is concerned with ensuring the physical safety of the employees within the aviation industry by seeking to reduce workplace accidents and
Air Pollution and its Potential Solutions Solving this problem requires a three-pronged approach, as different solutions are required to eliminate, or at least decrease, air pollution from electricity generation, transportation, and industry. All solutions demand cooperation between the government and the public—no solution will succeed without the dedicated effort of the population as a whole. The Clean Air Act, which was passed in 2008 but only went into effect in 2011, is the government’s main attempt at managing this problem. It was created to improve air quality and reduce air pollution, thereby improving the health and quality of life for people of the region and protecting the environment for future generations. It details several different programs aimed at achieving this goal.
The EPA regulates discharges of pollutants from municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants, sewer collection systems, and storm water discharges. Overflows of raw sewage and inefficiently controlled storm water discharges from sewer systems can end up in waterways or cause backups into city streets or basements threatening water quality. EPA also enforces requirements to make sure that industries pre-treat pollutants in their wastes in order to protect local sanitary sewers and wastewater treatment plants. The EPA investigates and inspects those discharging material into wetlands and other waters of the United States without proper permits. (Water Enforcement,
Pollution is the act or process of polluting or the state of being polluted, especially the contamination of soil, water, or the atmosphere by the discharge of harmful substances (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=pollution). Pollution is a universal problem. It seems that many businesses and people are unaware of the effect that pollutants have on people. Car exhaustion, tobacco smoking, dumping waste, and emission from factories and plants are just a few ways to pollute our ozone. I will discuss two Acts that the Environmental Protection Agency complies with. They include the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.
Last year, the United States government spent roughly eight billion dollars on the environment (EPA.gov). Since 1970, many acts to protect the environment have been established such as the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act, not to mention the countless environmental committees and councils which have been established. Such programs are evidence that the United States government has worked vigorously to help control our impact on the environment. Because of this work America does not need to implement new regulations to decrease the average American’s environmental footprint. Instead of focusing on issues that the government has already addressed, the United States needs to reroute its interest to more impending problems.
Moreover, the Clean Air Act, which imposed more federal authority over the states through the EPA program, provides a greater glimpse of how policy-making through more federal control can affect an economy and bring results. As discussed, the amendments added onto the Clean Air Act in 1990 ultimately increased federal authority as the EPA could set new regulations. Recently, the EPA has taken control of various state environmental programs thereby expanding its power. Nonetheless, the true question lies on whether these actions are detrimental to state sovereignty as well as their economies, or are they appropriate to fulfill the environmental protection agenda. According to the official EPA website, the Clean Air Act has successfully been