Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criticism of auteur theory
Auteur Theory is based on the premise that a filmmaker's personal technique gives his or her films a distinctive style. Furthermore, studies on the Auteur Theory in Film have often looked towards Lars Von Trier as the Cinemas "enfant terrible" due to his controversial approach to rebelling against the conventional with provocative ideas and projects in each of his films. Born near Copenhagen in 1956, the future filmmaker had an atypical childhood. As a student at Denmark's National film school, Von Trier produced his first feature films 'The Element of Crime' (1984) and 'Europa' (1991) which were hailed for their complex visual style. Europa was pegged as a contender for the top prize at Cannes Films Festival for its astonishing visuals and …show more content…
Von Trier's source of inspiration stems from the influence of Russian filmmaker, Andrei Tarkovsky, with his work often rife with references to one of the Soviet Union's greatest auteurs. Tarvosky used symbols, rhythm, and movements to share lasting stories which forever had an impact on Von Triers future features. The directors claim on his craft, was, in order to create original art, filmmakers should distinguish themselves from each other, stylistically. This philosophy truly came to fruition when Von Trier and fellow Dane filmmaker, Thomas Vinterburg set new rules for modern filmmaking called the Dogme Manifesto. Among Dogmes nine rules, all films must be shot on location, without any external props or lighting and the camera must be hand-held, challenging the traditional codes and conventions of filmmaking. Conversely, Von Triers first Dogme film, "The Idiots" (1998), showcases the odd behaviour of a group of adults who find therapeutic release in acting like idiots with fabricated mental disabilities in an upscale restaurant with a jarring video aesthetic to challenge bourgeois values. The director's low-tech provocation made the film debut at Cannes; however, it was also banned in several countries due to its explicit scenes and representation of mental illnesses. After the release of "The Idiots", Von Trier thrived off the audience's discomfort, stating …show more content…
Aside from the director's ability to excel in the seldom mention predominance of human drama, Von Trier's use of unconventional editing also manages to exaggerate the emotions through the extremities of his characters and stories. After the establishment of the Dogme Manifesto, Von Trier released 'Breaking the Waves' (1996). The feature wasn't considered to be a Dogme film, however, the films Mise en Scene elements were similar to the realistic sensibility of the obeyed rules. In a Calvinist community in the Scottish Highlands, a devoutly religious woman, Bess, played by Emilee Watson, falls in love with an oil rig worker who is recently paralysed in an accident. Due to her mental instability, she comes to believe that prostituting herself is the only way to cure him. The story focuses on the parallels of total devotion and sinks into depravity as Bess willingly degrades herself. A technique inherited from the Dogme movement which is recurring in Von Trier's films, is his style of frantic editing, in specific, archetypal cutting. In 'Breaking the Waves', the use of agile camera work, paired with short shots, capture the absolute peaks of emotion. For example, within the last few sequences of the film, the intensity builds, and the shots quicken, as Bess descends into a ships cavern, convinced God
The film illustrates the common social and sexual anxieties that the Germans were undergoing at that period of time. It also employs cinematic aesthetics alongside with new technology to create what would be considered as one of Germany’s first sound-supported films. Furthermore, it was the film that popularized its star Marlene Dietrich. The film is also known for combining elements of earlier expressionist works into its setting without becoming an expressionist film itself. It is important also to point out that the visual element has helped to balance the film easily against the backdrop the nightclub lifestyle that Lola leads the professor to fall into.
...eflects the director’s personal creative vision, as if they were the primary ‘auteur’ – which is the French word for author. As far as the law goes, any film that is produced is treated as a work of art, and the auteur, as the creator of the film, is the original copyright holder. This theory has influenced film criticism since the early 1950’s, when it was originally advocated for by the film director and critic, Francois Truffaut, through a certain type of film analysis. Auteur theory itself was developed a few years later in the US through the writings of The Village Voice critic, Andrew Sarris.
The first painting analyzed was North Country Idyll by Arthur Bowen Davis. The focal point was the white naked woman. The white was used to bring her out and focus on the four actual colored males surrounding her. The woman appears to be blowing a kiss. There is use of stumato along with atmospheric perspective. There is excellent use of color for the setting. It is almost a life like painting. This painting has smooth brush strokes. The sailing ship is the focal point because of the bright blue with extravagant large sails. The painting is a dry textured flat paint. The painting is evenly balanced. When I look at this painting, it reminds me of settlers coming to a new world that is be founded by its beauty. It seems as if they swam from the ship.
Imagine pondering into a reconstruction of reality through only the visual sense. Without tasting, smelling, touching, or hearing, it may be hard to find oneself in an alternate universe through a piece of art work, which was the artist’s intended purpose. The eyes serve a much higher purpose than to view an object, the absorptions of electromagnetic waves allows for one to endeavor on a journey and enter a world of no limitation. During the 15th century, specifically the Early Renaissance, Flemish altarpieces swept Europe with their strong attention to details. Works of altarpieces were able to encompass significant details that the audience may typically only pay a cursory glance. The size of altarpieces was its most obvious feat but also its most important. Artists, such as Jan van Eyck, Melchior Broederlam, and Robert Campin, contributed to the vast growth of the Early Renaissance by enhancing visual effects with the use of pious symbols. Jan van Eyck embodied the “rebirth” later labeled as the Renaissance by employing his method of oils at such a level that he was once credited for being the inventor of oil painting. Although van Eyck, Broederlam, and Campin each contributed to the rise of the Early Renaissance, van Eyck’s altarpiece Adoration of the Mystic Lamb epitomized the artworks produced during this time period by vividly incorporating symbols to reconstruct the teachings of Christianity.
In the University Of Arizona Museum Of Art, the Pfeiffer Gallery is displaying many art pieces of oil on canvas paintings. These paintings are mostly portraits of people, both famous and not. They are painted by a variety of artists of European decent and American decent between the mid 1700’s and the early 1900’s. The painting by Elizabeth Louise Vigee-Lebrun caught my eye and drew me in to look closely at its composition.
Rene Descartes was a philosopher who introduced a popular philosophical method called Radical Doubt in his book Meditations on First Philosophy. Descartes “proposed discarding any kind of belief that could be doubted, [because it] might be false”. In both Shutter Island directed by Martin Scorsese and The Shining directed by Stanley Kubrick, the viewers are introduced to characters that doubt the very existence of reality, much like Descartes, and who are drowned in the depths of insanity. Fear, paranoia, and doubt are the main ingredients that make both movies a psychological mind maze that constantly teases the brain in every turn. Martin Scorsese and Stanley Kubrick are both masters in cinema direction and are not regulars in the horror genre. Nonetheless, both have created a product that makes viewers question what it's like to be sane. The goal of this essay is to demonstrate the similarities and differences between Shutter Island and The Shining based on their themes of insanity, isolation, and alcoholism.
Pudovkin was a Russian/ Soviet filmmaker and actor who also showed insight into the world of film editing. Many learnt from his “Five ...
David Bordwell. The Idea of Montage in Soviet Art and Film. – Cinema Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1972, 9-17.
Elissa Auther is, states in the reading that “Elissa Auther is Associate Professor of Contemporary Art at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs and Adjunct Curator at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Denver. Her book, String, Felt, Thread and the Hierarchy of Art and Craft (University of Minnesota Press, 2010), examines the innovative use of fiber in American art and the impact of its elevation on the conceptual boundaries distinguishing “art” from “craft” in the post-war era.” Auther starts by comparing two works of rope and wire. She points out that these two pieces could have been made by the same artist but there were received very differently when exhibited.
Catherine Deneuve’s film roles are typically characterised by ‘a temperament at once passionate and inviolable’ (GEOFFREY HARTMAN). To what extent, and in what ways, is this manifested in any ONE OR MORE of the films you have studied on the module?
(1995) is about both material and spiritual destruction after the World War II. Angelospouslos is one of the most popular succesful director of the Greek cinema. The film has important stars such as Erland Josephson as Ivo Levy Maia Morgenstern as woman in A's home town (Penelope), Kali (Calypso), widow (Circe), Naomi (Nausicaa), and Harvey Keitel as A. It is perfectly complemented by a somber, brooding musical score by Eleni Karaindrou. As Ivo Levy ( Erland Josephson)
Personally, my culture did not play a big role when I was in the midst
Art is everywhere whether one likes it or not, and can be appreciated in the smallest of ways. It’s absolutely necessary for the growth of a society and its people. It’s mainly used for businesses today to either raise people’s opinions of their company or sell a product. For example if you go to the marketplace and you pick up a gallon of milk the first thing you may see on that gallon is a picture of a cow or the same milk being poured into a glass in a way that captures the eye and makes you think “wow that looks great!” This is the most common use for visual art today and often makes people “miss the point” of what it truly means (Why Art Matters, 1). Advertisement is one of the biggest fields in then visual arts and shapes the way we see a product as well as the choices we make on such judgment. This is where the illusion comes in making the visual arts, a potentially harmful thing. The illusion of it comes from what’s true and what’s made up or “altered truth”. A company could make their product seem way better than it really is essentially tricking people into buying it. One example is when you go to a fast food restaurant and you see signs of perfect looking sandwiches when in reality they don’t look like that. Most people don’t see any illusion but when they do it’s hard for them to see the other side of things, the ones that aren’t “stretching the truth”. People today tend to see that kind of advertisement as normal. In fact, it kind of helps with things like morale by making things seem much more worth it and just all around nicer. So there for the arts are the very “soul” of a successful business.
“Art washes from the soul the dust of everyday life” (Picasso). These words about the fine arts describe not only life in general, but also apply to everyday life of public school students. Many students need something to divert their attention away from jaded academics that cause them stress and mental deterioration. Fine arts are the solution to that problem; unlike academics and athletics, they provide an outlet for students to be creative and discover their talents without the pressure other courses produce. Additionally, the arts stimulate the brain, and generally promote positive brain activity and development in teenagers. So, if fine arts positively affect students, then why are they so
Human’s have always struggled to express themselves. Art, is considered by many to be the ultimate form of human expression. Many assume that art has a definition, but this is not the case. Art, it can be said, is “in the eye of the beholder.” This simply means that what you consider art, someone else would not. Art is part of a person’s internal emotions, which signifies why different people see art as different things. Every type of culture and era presents distinctive and unique characteristics. Different cultures all have different views of what art can, and would be, causing art itself to be universally renowned throughout the world.