Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Italian unification 1815-70
Italian unification 1815-70
Introduction of italian unification
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Italian unification 1815-70
Austria as the Main Barrier for Italian Reunification
Austria was one of the major barriers for Italian reunification taking
place during 1815-1831. However, a number of other problems beset
Italian nationalists during this period that weakened the movement
towards Risorgimento.
In 1815, Italy like most of Europe had its borders and rulers put back
to Pre-Napoleon times. At the Vienna Conference, the Great Powers met
to discuss Europe's fate after the fall of Napoleon. Italy was put
under the influence of Austria to ensure a balance of power, and as
compensation for Austria losing the Netherlands.
If we look at a map of Italy, we can see why Austria was one of the
major barriers stopping reunification. All the seven states were
heavily influenced by Austria. Offshoots of the Royal Hapsburg family
ruled Parma, The Kingdom of Lombardy-Venetia Tuscany and Modena. The
King of Piedmont was restored by Austrian troops, as was the Pope,
reactionary policies were resumed in both these states. The Kingdom of
Two Scillies signed a defensive alliance with Austria. This network
effectively ensured Austrian domination of the Italian Penisular, as
long as this existed the Risorgimento would stay a distant dream.
Between 1815-31, Austria was led by its chancellor Prince Clemens
Metternich. He created the Metternich system; this involved the
repression of nationalism and liberalism within the sphere of Austrian
influence and the creation of a network of alliances throughout
Europe. This policy aimed to strengthen the position of the old order
against the threat of revolutionary uprisings. The secret police and
the reactionary policies of...
... middle of paper ...
...othing special about the Restored
Monarchs they were not reactionary. They tried to set up a central
administration to carry out everyday business, this created popular
opposition. However, there can be no excuse for Piedmont, The Papal
States, Modena and Naples. This view is fairer on the restored
monarchs than the accepted old view.
In conclusion, Austria was a major barrier to Italian Reunification
between 1815-31 due its far-reaching influence over the Italian
Peninsular. But the weakness of the secret societies with their
parochial views, the rise of the 'zealots', the lack of the support
from the peasants, the lack of a leader, the lack of support from any
major countries for unification and the reactionary policies of the
Restored Monarchs all combined to impede the movement to Risorgimento
during 1815-31.
In 19th century Italian states united to make Italy while the Germanic states united and made Germany. For Italy there were three people who had a major role in unifying Italy. They were Mazzini, Garibaldi and Cavour. For Germany it was more like one person who united the German states to make Germany and that was Bismarck. On the other hand there was a strong Austrian empire that would not tolerate any nationalist feelings to rise anywhere in Europe.
The main goal of new and absolute monarchies was the centralize the state. War, civil war, class war, feudal rebellion, and banditry afflicted a good deal of Europe in the middle of the fifteenth century. Various rulers now tried to impose a kind of civil peace. They thus laid the foundations for the national states. Similarly, in the early part of the 17th century, wars pertaining now to religion and dynasty had a profound impact upon the western European states. As military spending increased, monarchs realized the importance unifying their state possessed.
This wanting lea d to the unfying of Italy and Germany. Soon nationalism had increased the peoples confidedence., and a feeling of imperialism ran through the unified countries. Unified countries such as France, Germany, Russia wanted to extend their empires. But this Imperialism in Europe led to many conflicts between countries.
Ginsborg P (1990). ‘A History of Contemporary Italy: Society and Politics: 1943-1980’ Published by Penguin; Reprint edition (27 Sep 1990).
country. The Italians did not take help or aid from anyone for any reason. They brought
Next, we will discuss the Risorgimento, a 19th-century movement for unification of Italy that would ultimately establish the Kingdom of Italy in 1861. Before this time, the Italian peninsula
The first and possibly most important cause of World War I may have been the allying of the countries involved in the war and the posturing for action which they participated in. Although many treaties were signed and many alliances made previously, the start of the time line of WWI may be traced to the Dual Alliance signed by Germany and Austria-Hungary in 1879, to which Italy joined in 1882 forming the Triple Alliance. It was an agreement that was one of military protection, stating that if a...
harles Albert was succeeded by his son Victor Emmanuel II seen as defying Austrian plans for the Statuto’s abolition. Most historians now believe he was not anxious to keep it but was pressured by the Austrians to keep it instead. Austrians believed anything besides a republic was tolerable. · The constitution remained in force and gave opportunity for an active political life in Piedmont something which did not exist anywhere else in Italy. · It had reasonably free press, an elected if unrepresentative assembly, and a certain amount of civil liberty and legal equality.
First of all, this is determined by Italy's weak and foreign expansion policy. Secondly, this is also determined by Italy's national interests. Third, after the outbreak of World War I, the Allied Powers all met the requirements of the Italian territory.
Because of this, they are often seen as the beginning cause to WWII, which isn't necessarily true. Italy alone didn't do anything bad enough to start a war, but when you put Italy's, Germany's and Japan's actions together then you get the reasons for WWII. Italy being a Fascist country wasn't a problem, until he started killing his oppositions and taking land by force that wasn't his. Had the League of Nations worked properly, then Mussolini would probably have been stopped after the Corfu incident, but as it stood he was given what he wanted and allowed to think that using force was acceptable. Most of the incidents that occurred in Europe in the 1920s and 30s could have been solved if someone had done something different or if something else
...n Italy’s support by promising Venetia and gained Russia’s assurance that they would stay neutral. Prussia was well prepared for war, with three Prussian armies swept Bohemia, and the battle of Sadowa, Austria suffered defeat.
It became a landmark in all the countries it touched: Belguin, Austria, Spain, Prussia, Italy and Russia
The Extent to Which Austria was the Main Obstacle to the Unification of Italy in the Period 1815-1849
In 1882 Italy, angry at France chiefly because France had forestalled an Italian advance by occupying Tunis, signed another secret treaty, which bound it with Germany and Austria-Hungary. Thus was the Triple Alliance formed. It was periodically renewed until 1913. In 1882 Serbia joined the alliance, in effect, through a treaty with Austria-Hungary. Romania joined the group in 1883, and a powerful Central European bloc was created. Italy was from the first not so solidly bound to either of its allies as Germany and Austria-Hungary were to each other. Italy was in fact a rival of Austria-Hungary in the Balkans and particularly for control of the Adriatic; moreover, there remained unsettled territorial problems (see irredentism). The Triple Alliance, however, turned diplomatic history into new channels. 4