Augustine's Civitas

399 Words1 Page

Reformation theologian, John Calvin, subscribed to Luther's democratic "priesthood of all believers," but at the same time, he re-established a distinct church authority by prescribing a governance of presbyters, elders, and deacons.
The State
In trying to comprehend S. Augustine's thought about the State, we must avoid one error, that of translating Civitas (citizens) by State. His thought, as I said, is eminently social. He thinks of good and bad as gathered in two societies. Only at the last judgment will the Civitas terrena be dissolved into its constituent atoms. But Civitas is not for Augustine a term convertible with respublica; and the Civitas Dei is to be found long before a visible Church existed, even before the call of Abraham. …show more content…

More than once he explains civitas as equivalent to society. The primary distinction is always between two societies, the body of the reprobate and the communion sanctorum; not between Church and State. With his strong doctrine of election, it is natural that he should follow Tyconius in his views of the bipartite nature of the body of God, i.e. the elect and the merely nominal members. On earth, these two bodies are intermingled, and always will be. Only partially and for certain purposes is the Civitas terrena represented by any earthly polity. The Church represents the Civitas Dei rather by symbol than by identification. This error is often made. Some phrases seem to the point that way. But first of all the distinction is to be drawn as I have stated. An error has arisen by identifying sans phrase the Civitas terrena with the State as such; and by taking every predicate applied to the Civitas Dei as obviously intended for the Church Militant. It would be less inaccurate to represent it, in the familiar phrase, as the conflict between the Church and the World. Even this would not be right. The real division is one which will be made manifest at the Last Judgment, and not until then. All early distinctions are but the symbols, never adequate,

Open Document