Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
St Augustine's Philosophy on evil
Essays about free will
St Augustine's Philosophy on evil
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: St Augustine's Philosophy on evil
Augustine and Freedom
Evil-doing is neglect of eternal things and love of temporal things to the extent of
becoming subject to them. This is done by the free choice of the will . . . Free will
makes sin possible but it was given that man might live righteously.1
This is a brief summary of what Augustine believed regarding (1) the origin of sin and (2) the
purpose for which humanity was endowed with free choice of the will. Though insightful as it
may seem, Augustine's statement will not set to rest all the issues raised by the notion of
human freedom and divine activity, since with free choice of the will come perplexing
questions that continue to rage in philosophical circles. Some questions, however, can be set
forth that outline parameters within which to begin understanding Augustine on the issue of
human freedom and its origins/causes.
If evil originates in the human will, from where does the will come? Are there any limitations to
human freedom? Is the human will neutral or does it have a bias toward good? A bias toward
evil? Where does free choice of the will come into play when individuals are saved by God's
grace alone? What is meant by free will? On these questions, and many more related,
Augustine has been an immense help.
In this work an attempt will be made to illustrate Augustine's view of free will. Such categories
as God's sovereignty in election and salvation, the origin of evil and its impact upon humanity,
the justice of God, human responsibility and the providence of God in sanctification of the
believer will be utilized. Augustine's understanding of human freedom should corroborate with
(1) the nature and character of God, (2) the integrity of...
... middle of paper ...
...God's relationship to time changed when
time came into existence see William L. Craig, "God, Time and Eternity" Religious Studies
14 (1978): 497-503.
32.Norman L. Geisler, Philosophy of Religion (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, n.d.), note 10,
chapter 14, 331.
33.Cf., Lewis and Demarest, Integrative, vol. 1, op. cit., 310-328.
34. On Free Will," Book II, xv, 48, AEW, 166.
35. Ibid.
36."The Simplican," The Second Question, 3, ALW, 388.
37.Ibid., 12, op. cit., 394-395.
38.AEW, Book III, vi, 18,181.
39."The Simplican," The Second Question, 13, ALW, 395.
40.William L. Craig, The Only Wise God (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1987), 135. Though Craig
holds to fallen creatures having power to contrary, it is likely that middle knowledge is
still possible given the alternative view of freedom offered here (viz.,
St. Augustine of Hippo, Boethius, and Anselm all address the concept of free will and God’s foreknowledge in their works “The City of God”, “The Consolation of Philosophy”, and “De Concordia”. While each work was written during a different time period, each of their approaches consists of a solution comprised of both unifying and unique points and arguments. While there is no clear contesting between one work and another, it is clear that free will is a complex and critical idea in Christian theology that has long since been debated. '
This paper will outline specific points in Saint Augustine’s Confessions that highlight religious views following the fall of Rome. Though Augustines views on religion may not reflect that of most people in his time period, it still gives valuable insight into how many, namely Neoplatonists,, viewed God and his teachings.
A foundational belief in Christianity is the idea that God is perfectly good. God is unable to do anything evil and all his actions are motives are completely pure. This principle, however, leads to many questions concerning the apparent suffering and wrong-doing that is prevalent in the world that this perfect being created. Where did evil come from? Also, how can evil exist when the only eternal entity is the perfect, sinless, ultimately good God? This question with the principle of God's sovereignty leads to even more difficult problems, including human responsibility and free will. These problems are not limited to our setting, as church fathers and Christian philosophers are the ones who proposed some of the solutions people believe today. As Christianity begins to spread and establish itself across Europe in the centuries after Jesus' resurrection, Augustine and Boethius provide answers, although wordy and complex, to this problem of evil and exactly how humans are responsible in the midst of God's sovereignty and Providence.
There are two kinds of evil, moral and natural. Moral evil is things like murder, rape, stealing, terrorism, etc. Natural evil is things like suffering and unpleasantness typically as a result of moral evil. Evil is that which has no power of its own. Evil is darkness, a negation of light. Its power is in us, in our fear of it, in that we consider it a "something" worth responding to.
In the Confessions, Augustine wrote about his struggle with understanding how evil exists in a world created by God. He questioned how it was possible and why God allows evil in his creations because God is supremely good. After delving into finding a solution, Augustine concluded that evil does not exist, and the things deemed as evil are caused by free will. This paper will argue that Augustine has successfully proven that evil does not exist by explaining his earlier explanation of the origin of evil taught by the Manicheans, explaining Augustine’s teachings, and finally, using the textual descriptions of Augustine’s unwillingness to convert as support for his conclusion.
The aim of this essay is to prove the reliability of and why Libertarianism is the most coherent of the three views, which refers to the idea of human free will being true, that one is not determined, and therefore, they are morally responsible. In response to the quote in the essay, I disagree with Wolf. This essay will be further strengthened with the help of such authors as C.A. Campbell, R. Taylor and R.M. Chisholm. They present similar arguments, which essentially demonstrate that one could have done otherwise and one is the sole author of the volition. I will present the three most common arguments in support of Libertarianism, present an objection against Libertarianism and attempt to rebut it, as well as reject one main argument from the other.
It therefore appears evident that God must be the root of all evil, as He created all things. However, Augustine delves deeper in search for a true answer. This paper will follow ...
In the article "Why God Allows Evil," Swinburne separates evil into two sections, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil sprouts from the wrongdoings of humans. Having free will can lead us to make certain choices that we make can have consequences. On the other hand, natural evil does not result from human action making it unpredictable. Natural evil associates with natural occurrences such as earthquakes, hurricanes, or diseases.
In the beginning, God created the world. He created the earth, air, stars, trees and mortal animals, heaven above, the angels, every spiritual being. God looked at these things and said that they were good. However, if all that God created was good, from where does un-good come? How did evil creep into the universal picture? In Book VII of his Confessions, St. Augustine reflects on the existence of evil and the theological problem it poses. For evil to exist, the Creator God must have granted it existence. This fundamentally contradicts the Christian confession that God is Good. Logically, this leads one to conclude evil does not exist in a created sense. Augustine arrives at the conclusion that evil itself is not a formal thing, but the result of corruption away from the Supreme Good. (Augustine, Confessions 7.12.1.) This shift in understanding offers a solution to the problem of evil, but is not fully defended within Augustine’s text. This essay will illustrate how Augustine’s solution might stand up to other arguments within the context of Christian theology.
Author Claudia Gray stated, “Self-knowledge is better than self-control any day” (Goodreads). Evil and sin exists in our world today and the temptation they bring bounds many human’s spiritual being. Finding the root of all evil is a hard and torturous concept to understand, but knowing one’s own free will helps bring understanding and deliverance from the evils of the world. Throughout the book Confessions Saint Augustine “ponders the concepts of evil and sin and searches the root of their being” (Augustine 15). The existence of evil is one of the most worrisome challenges a Christian or any individual deals with throughout life. Saint Augustine’s beliefs concerning the root of all evil and sins transforms as he begins to grow and develop in the knowledge of his free will and spiritual being. Early on, he believes “God created all things and evil is a thing, therefore God created evil” (Augustine 73-74). From this he conceives the notion that God cannot be good if he knowingly created evil. As Augustine begins to grow in his spiritual walk, his views begin to evolve as he questions his Manichee’s beliefs and explores the concepts of good and evil. From his inquiring Augustine develops the question, what is evil and what if evil did not need creating? He asks, “Do we have any convincing evidence that a good God exists” (Augustine 136-137)?
Being moved by Victorinus' story Augustine wants to able to convert to Christianity, however, he cannot break his old habit. Later, Ponticianus tells Augustine that some of his friends are dedicating their lives to God. Because of this he feels ashamed that he cannot dedicate his life to God/Christ while other people were able. Augustine goes to the garden and breaks down. During this his time in the garden, he was able to distinguish between good and bad. Furthermore, he reads a letter that helps him convert to Christianity and dedicate his life to God. His conversion can be considered a philosophical event and religious event.
Ever thought about who controls the decisions you make regarding your daily activities? You may think you control every aspect of your life, but some philosophers have questioned such notions. Many schools of thought explain the analogy of free will, and they present the argument of whether we have the freedom to act or other causes and effects determine our destiny. Free will in this context is defined as the freedom to choose and act where there several alternative courses of action. Theologically, the concept of free will is presented as the power to make decisions on our own without necessarily been influenced by external or predetermined courses.
In his Confessions, Augustine of Hippo offers a theory on the idea of free will that is becoming increasingly relevant today. Augustine’s beliefs surrounding free will stem from his theory that, if everything God created is good, then any sin that we commit are our own responsibility, and that it is our duty to use our free will to allow good into ourselves. He believes that we as people need to learn to use our free will to control our inherently corrupt nature, rather than use it to further us down the path of sin. The only way to do so is by taking responsibility for one’s own sin, and by getting rid of the absence of good in ourselves by allowing God to enter our lives instead.
The first view I would like to point out is Augustine’s theory. This view shouldn’t come as a surprise, but at times it has been understood that Augustine had varying opinions that he voices that some may consider a contradiction. Referencing an article from a student at Anslem College, Brown states, “Augustine’s strategy in terms of natural reason or philosophy is to refute the twin claims that God’s activity puts freedom at risk and that our free choices (our good one’s at any rate) are free from God’s activity. That is, Augustine exercises a negative philosophy here, showing that God’s activity does not threaten freedom of choice and that freedom of choice does not escape God’s activity…There are two truths here that Augustine considers irrefutable. On the one hand, from any exercise of our reason thinking about the world, we come to the knowledge of the existence of God the creator, source of all that is. On the other hand, it is self-evident that we have free choice. This is, as it were, a first principle of practical reason: without it “we” cannot act. “We are in no way compelled either to preserve God’s prescience by abolishing our free will, or to safeguard our free will by denying (blasphemously) the divine foreknowledge. We
He argues that man’s nature is ultimately good since it is created by God Himself, who is truly and perfectly good (bk. 7, ch. 12, sec. 18). However, this does not account for man’s indecisiveness or poor decisions. To account for this, Augustine states that man possesses many conflicting wills that persuade man’s soul to act. Man’s sin, therefore, is not a result of a twisted or perverted nature. Rather, sin itself sparks a multitude of wills to arise in an individual, causing a state of unrest in the soul. Among these wills exist both good and bad intentions. Man remains in this state until he chooses a will to act upon, which puts his soul at rest. According to Augustine, man is called to adhere to God´s will by his own nature, which is good. All men are capable of having God's will, but all men do not choose to act upon it; the ones who choose to overcome the influences of their other wills and follow God's will are the ones who are able to convert (bk. 8, ch. 10, sec.